QUOTE(i1899 @ Feb 5 2018, 01:02 AM)
During my last portfolio health check, my CIS advised me to cut down the supplementary funds, as it exceed 20% (G.China + Tech + India), so i made such move.
My situation might be different with yours, below were my considerations in making such move, that might not useful in your situation.
1. TA global tech to United Global Quality (MYR hedged) because:
- I need a Global Equity Fund in my portfolio, as one of my CORE FUNDS, which can invest freely onto anywhere, any sector, any capital size of company. So that, i don't have to hold too much number of funds just for diversification purpose (esp country specific/ sector specific fund). United Global Quality is the ONLY ONE fund that fits above requirement because it is "not Global islamic" fund, "not Global Titans/ Leaders/ small cap/ growth/ value/ dividend" fund. Furthermore, it is Hedged to MYR, which can limit the currency risk. I believe that 2018 will be a bad year for USD.
- TA Global Tech is the second worst performer (in term of IRR) with 16.6% IRR, in my portfolio.
- For Tech stocks, PER of Nasdaq 100 is 26.342, but the fair PE is 18.0, it priced at 46% more than its fair value. So, i feel a bit worry to be concentrate on only tech sector.
- To cut down my supplementary funds, and move it as core funds.
2. India to Greater China because:
- volatility of india is too high for me. It can suddenly drops 4% in 1 day, then the other 2% the next day, wash out all the profit make in 2 months before, then repeat this cycle about 3 months later.
- It is the worst performer (in term of IRR) with 13.3% IRR, in my portfolio.
- Sensex Index PER is 23.85, fair PER is 18.0. That make India the most expensive market in Asia.
- To cut down my supplementary funds.
- My Asia Fund (50% of my portfolio) do cover India.
- For Greater China, HSML 100 PER is at 13.81, not exceed its Fair PE 14.
I assumed it's from FSM.My situation might be different with yours, below were my considerations in making such move, that might not useful in your situation.
1. TA global tech to United Global Quality (MYR hedged) because:
- I need a Global Equity Fund in my portfolio, as one of my CORE FUNDS, which can invest freely onto anywhere, any sector, any capital size of company. So that, i don't have to hold too much number of funds just for diversification purpose (esp country specific/ sector specific fund). United Global Quality is the ONLY ONE fund that fits above requirement because it is "not Global islamic" fund, "not Global Titans/ Leaders/ small cap/ growth/ value/ dividend" fund. Furthermore, it is Hedged to MYR, which can limit the currency risk. I believe that 2018 will be a bad year for USD.
- TA Global Tech is the second worst performer (in term of IRR) with 16.6% IRR, in my portfolio.
- For Tech stocks, PER of Nasdaq 100 is 26.342, but the fair PE is 18.0, it priced at 46% more than its fair value. So, i feel a bit worry to be concentrate on only tech sector.
- To cut down my supplementary funds, and move it as core funds.
2. India to Greater China because:
- volatility of india is too high for me. It can suddenly drops 4% in 1 day, then the other 2% the next day, wash out all the profit make in 2 months before, then repeat this cycle about 3 months later.
- It is the worst performer (in term of IRR) with 13.3% IRR, in my portfolio.
- Sensex Index PER is 23.85, fair PER is 18.0. That make India the most expensive market in Asia.
- To cut down my supplementary funds.
- My Asia Fund (50% of my portfolio) do cover India.
- For Greater China, HSML 100 PER is at 13.81, not exceed its Fair PE 14.
Do you need to visit their office in order to get/request the portfolio health check? Or it's done thru phone/email?
what exactly is covered in this "portfolio health check"?
Feb 5 2018, 02:02 PM

Quote
0.0526sec
0.96
7 queries
GZIP Disabled