I beg to differ.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Comparing equity funds with bond funds are like comparing apples and oranges.
It's unlikely that a bond fund will give you negative return unless the fund manager adopts a more active trading strategy (i.e. more speculative) and failed to beat the market or the bond issuers default. Bonds just don't crash easily. Equity and debt instruments are not the same.
wasn't sure if you are responding to my post or not, but I reread my post as above and I never mention at all equities and bond fund are same.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Most bond funds on FSM adopt a more conservative buy-and-hold strategy. This is reflected in their relatively low PTR and low expense ratio. A bond fund's return should not differ much from its underlying bond's coupon rate, after factoring in all the necessary expenses. Usually, you can a expect a 5-6% annualized return over the long run.
5 - 6% for the low risk you are taking, ok mah. If you ask me, it is pretty good deal.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Asnita seems to have a 50-80% turnover which is slightly above average. This is something worth noting. Looking at Morningstar's ranking and return over time, it is just above average.
Bond markets are usually
very stable, especially those high quality, investment-grade ones. The majority of bond investors adopt the buy-and-hold strategy. Secondary bond markets can be very illiquid sometimes. Such is the liquidity risk that all bond investors must bear.
Regarding the zero exposure to MGS. According to the
2018 fund's annual report, "Libra ASnitaBOND invests principally in
Government and semi-Government sukuk, Islamic money market instruments, Corporate sukuk, and Islamic treasury products"
Hmmm... I reread the Product Highlight sheet as well as Fund Fact Sheet and all the above words you had bolded are not contain therein. It only says; I quote, " near cash instruments and sukuk " & "The Fund is an open-ended unit trust fund with a short to medium term investment horizon, which invests primarily in sukuk. "
Apa lu baca, kawan? How come lain punya?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
I am not sure how you can be confident that Westerners don't care about local corporate sukuks. I have seen Bloomberg discussed sukuks a few times in their TV programmes. Malaysia has one of the world's largest sukuk market. There are certainly Western investors who want to diversify their investments and look for sukuk funds and Islamic sukuks that are traded just like any other bonds. That's why there are Islamic sukuks funds in overseas as well. Most of them hold blue-chips's sukuks, like TNB, Axiata and Petronas.
If anything goes wrong with MGS, I don't think the corporates' sukuk will do any better. This is true especially for GLCs' sukuk.
Just my 2 cents.
Omputeh investor, which in my understanding means instituitional investors and they will not touch small capitilized corporate bonds. I mean; look at our large cap company, how many are listed as Fortune 500 company? Look again at the Fund Fact Sheet of Asnita Bond and look at their top 5 holdings... how many of the corporate sukuks are from Fortune 500 companies. How many of the sukuks are even from KLSE FTSE Index 30 companies? Therefore, my assertion that Libra Asnita Bond is not holding on to sukuks that will interest omputeh in the near and mid term stands.
Just my 2.75 cts
Xuzen
This post has been edited by xuzen: Apr 23 2019, 08:48 PM