Seriously what are you trying to achieve?
for my case, I think it may not be a wise idea to have an IRR incorporated into my FSM a/c.
1st,. like myself....I have 2 UT investment a/c ....1 with FSM and 1 with Affinhwang........thus have to consolidated my UT investment performance
2st,....like myself....it was not a good feeling and at times demoralising when after 3 1/2 years of UT investing.....the IRR shows < 4% which make me wonder if I did make a wrong judgement in investing in UT instead of chasing FD promo
anyway I think IRR is a wise call to have IRR data in the FSM a/c too, for it could be informative to some group of investors.......
but what I learnt from here last year was IRR did not consider your learning curves factor.....so for those that had long period of depressing IRR value , like I did,.....
unless you keep holding the same portfolio for years and still not keen to change.......
I did the normal IRR (since investment date start) and I also consider another IRR value from which I made major changes to my portfolio composition (since new portfolio start)......
but when reviewing the IRR of this new port I also have to consider the timing of my new port entry..for I may have been lucky that the timing of my new port formation could have coincided with the mkt upswing period ....just like this latest port formation and entry.....
I will have to wait for a major correction to see how my port formation stand after the major sell off before I can tell if my port is anywhere near/close to better than the last one.
good and bad actions are shown in IRR that exclude the good or bad actions made recently to change the past performance......
i agree. very disheartening when you see it's still less than 4% or even 8% per year. i mean, just trying to outdo FD only ma. not as easy for some i guess.