Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Ryzen, AM4 / AM5 Platform

views
     
yimingwuzere
post Jan 28 2021, 01:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jan 28 2021, 09:48 AM)
2000 is the max it can go but only guaranteed to 1600. so I wont be surprised if 50% or even only 10% of the ryzens out there can stay absolutely stable at 2000 IF.

that 2000 value is the same as most mobos claim support up to 6000mhz ram OC because the vrm and socket can handle the loads and bios have settings untill that value but not guaranteed to reach.
*
2000 are for golden samples only as far as I can tell.

Based on what I read from other forums, Ryzen 3000 max realistic RAM target is 3733, whereas 5000 is 3800. Not sure if my CPU's SOC is a lemon or if it's a mobo BIOS issue, since I can get IF clock to 1900 or RAM to 3800 stable without issue individually, whereas it's extremely unstable when booting at 3800 in coupled mode.
yimingwuzere
post Jan 29 2021, 02:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jan 28 2021, 10:48 PM)
Well to be fair, officially 3200mhz has always been the promised speed. Anything higher is OCing.

The problem is their marketing, specifically that Robert Hallock clown. He went and indirectly promised 2000mhz 1:1 IF, eventhough it's almost impossible.

He said:
If he didn't said that last sentence, they wouldn't have gotten as much flack as they have had.

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-robert-hall...w-functionality
*
Which AGESA version is he referring to, though?
yimingwuzere
post Jan 29 2021, 03:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


user posted image

Final stable speeds on my Crucial Ballistix 3200C16 dual rank kit. VDIMM is 1.36V. No other timing adjustments seem to scale with RAM and SOC/VDDP/VDDG voltage at this point to be worth it (tried everything at 1.4V VDIMM, 1.1V VSOC, 1.05V VDDG, 0.9 VDDP).

tRAS was stable as low as 23, although 1usmus guides on the Internet tell me I should use tCL+tRCDRD, AIDA benchmarks for both tRAS 23/30/35 seem to be within margin of error. tRCDWR seems unusually low but even at 8 it passed TM5 anta777 config + 300% HCI.

Since 5000 series CPUs are supposed to hit 3800 RAM 1:1 with FCLK, gonna take one last crack at it.

If anyone has any ideas how to improve timings even further or run without geardown mode without dropping 1T, I'm all ears.

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Jan 29 2021, 07:17 PM
yimingwuzere
post Jan 30 2021, 05:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


Is there any correlation between core CPPC values and Clock Optimizer max stable negative offsets, other than the highest valued cores being favoured for 1T operations?

Also, what is the most reliable way of testing core instability? Cinebench seems to knock them out faster than Prime95 can, but only seems to be reliable at testing global values in Clock Optimizer as Cinebench keeps resetting manual core affinity in Windows even when running 1T.

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jan 30 2021, 03:34 PM)
I feel that tRCDWR is too low at 8, I think it shouldn't go below 14 to be frank. You can also lax that tCWL to 16.

May also want to increase CCD and IOD voltage to 1.0. I think VSOC is ok at 1.025, but IME 1.05 is needed to achieve max stability without causing that once in a blue moon WHEA error.
*
Hmm, ZenTimings is reading incorrect values for voltages.
VSOC =1.05V
VDDG = 0.95V
VDDP=0.9V

I did see a crash during 1/3 TM5 runs at 1.04V, whereas 1.05V seems to be solid.

QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jan 30 2021, 04:24 PM)
I wanted to built a 5900x system, but couldn't find any in stock at reasonable price for the past 2 months
so I got a 5800x instead few weeks back, currently all the parts are at my friend's place in process of building waterloop

today I got wind of 5900x back in stock and selling without bundle
my question is should I get the 5900x and sell off the 5800x?

originally gave up on 5900x and planned to use 5800x until when AMD releases 5900XT later then swap (if they make it)
*
Depends whether the current 5800X is gold or a lemon. Did any overclocking on it previously?

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Jan 30 2021, 05:19 PM
yimingwuzere
post Jan 30 2021, 09:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(iZuDeeN @ Jan 30 2021, 06:28 PM)
Anyone knows when clock tuner ryzen 2.0 will be released?
*
There's a closed beta right now, a handful of sites are currently testing it. I know Igor's Lab has access to it.
yimingwuzere
post Jan 30 2021, 11:50 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(iZuDeeN @ Jan 30 2021, 09:35 PM)
Saw some tweet mention it will be released on Feb 3rd ; likely 4th for us...

Will see whether the under volt will work on my chip
*
I'm already trying out curve optimizer as I speak haha

Would be nice to see what CTR gets for my CPU though!
yimingwuzere
post Feb 1 2021, 01:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(EBBattlefield @ Feb 1 2021, 08:34 AM)
WTB  icon_question.gif  icon_question.gif
*
I might be able to source an extra 5800X without retailer scalping but it'll be with a mobo combo.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 2 2021, 04:05 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


Depends, I've seen a small store offering a few with Strix B550-E earlier this month. Only 5800X though. Guess 5600X/5900X sells out way faster due to better price per core ratio.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 3 2021, 08:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


There is some correlation between CPPC values and voltage, but it's not consistent.

CPPC values, core priority from HWInfo and Curve Optimizer negative offsets below that survived 24hour Prime95 blend test:
127 7/8 13
146 2/3 10
143 3/4 16
150 1/1 10
135 5/6 13
139 4/5 16
150 1/2 8
131 6/7 15

Started with -20 and slowly bumped up the offset for any crashing cores in Prime95.

Now to figure out if it's stable during low power usage... what tools would be best to simulate that? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Feb 3 2021, 08:27 PM
yimingwuzere
post Feb 4 2021, 01:14 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Feb 3 2021, 09:58 PM)
the only tool i know is patience... just wait for it to crash laugh.gif
*
No WHEA errors so far... then again I didn't test this extensively by adjusting other values like LLC or voltage offset yet.

Haven't figured out what's a good tool to use to test that though. In the meantime, gonna give CTR 2.0 a spin - but I probably won't use it for daily until it supports curve optimizer.
https://www.igorslab.de/en/clock-tuner-for-...-and-much-more/

CTR tells me my CPU is a "silver sample".

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Feb 4 2021, 10:01 AM
yimingwuzere
post Feb 4 2021, 07:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 4 2021, 03:01 PM)
Haven't played too much with CTR 2.0, but so far... I don't know, I'm mixed about it. Using it means disabling PBO but you potentially get better all-core OC. To me, I'm using the PC for both work and play, so while I do like the all core OC, I do miss the single/dual core PBO.

So far, I think I still prefer curve optimizer as a whole.
*
Only advantage to using it is that it emulates a hybrid mode similar to the Asus Dark Hero, so it swaps all-core overclocks for max single core mode when low CPU usage is detected.

Curve Optimizer is planned for 2.1 so I'll wait for that. This tool as it stands right now seems best to fish out the quality of your CPU. Mine is a "silver sample", wonder how well "golden samples" work with Curve Optimizer.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 5 2021, 11:08 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(Current Events guy @ Feb 5 2021, 05:21 PM)
How different is the outcome when running the ctr clock/volt recommendation using their profile setup vs setting those clocks/volt in bios?
*
I have not tested manual clocks in BIOS. Curve Optimizer tuning is more in line with what I want to achieve, since all manual results in lower clockspeeds than the maximum possible single core turbo speed achievable. CTR of course aims to remedy this by switching off the all core overclock when low CPU utilization is detected (similar to Hybrid OC on the Asus Dark Hero, but with different detection methods), but another aim of Curve Optimizer is that it can potentially reduce power consumption even after hitting max turbo clocks. CTR will only support Curve Optimizer in version 2.1.

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Feb 5 2021, 11:08 PM
yimingwuzere
post Feb 7 2021, 01:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(Current Events guy @ Feb 6 2021, 04:14 AM)
I'm wondering what differences there are because I got a bsod when running cinebench r20 while trying out the undervolt setting in the bios. I suspect that the recommended volt might be too low. P1 and P2 were fine though.
*
Mine passed 30 mins of Cinebench R23 on top of the 24 hour prime95 loop. Try reducing your negative offset until it passes.

While Cinebench was faster at generating errors, Prime was so much easier overall to thread schedule, especially when I'm setting curve optimizer at a per-core level.

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Feb 7 2021, 01:35 AM
yimingwuzere
post Feb 8 2021, 05:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(diehard1979 @ Feb 8 2021, 05:14 PM)
so now the only choice will be msi and gigabyte right?
*
Asrock can be pretty decent too if you aren't buying Z490.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 10 2021, 08:09 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Feb 9 2021, 05:03 PM)
he has a point

asus unless u pay for maximus/crosshair/rampage.. the rest.. is ???
currently they made strix-e not bad
itx i dare say the b550i strix the only decent non crosshair itx they ever made but not cheap also

they nerf the bios based on tier

msi doesnt..
giga bios on intel is like a archaic piece of rubbish but like z490 ram oc part was actually decent
*
Strix-E pricing is kinda ruined in Malaysia though.

Z490-E is priced to go against Aorus Ultra in US, but in Malaysia it's just a bit short of Aorus Master pricing.
B550-E is priced to go against B550 Aorus Master in US, but here's it's price closely matches the X570 Aorus Master instead.

As for B550-I, it doesn't look anything special compared to the X570-I variant - I would have bought it without thinking if it just copied the X570-I's feature set and added a USB-C front port header.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 10 2021, 05:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 10 2021, 03:56 PM)
Can only hope they learnt their lesson. But the fact that Lisa Su is 100% adamant in 1 major release every fiscal year means that they won't even have time to take a shit.
*
Can't see them having any "major" releases this year other than new APUs and Threadripper though.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 10 2021, 10:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 10 2021, 05:24 PM)
They can always launch Zen 4 on Dec 31st. But availability = kosong.

Proven formula with Zen 3 and RDNA 2 see.
*
Zen arch releases are on a 5 quarter schedule so far so I doubt we'd see any this year too. Not to mention Apple has already gobbled up all of TSMC's 5nm allocation this year IIRC.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 11 2021, 02:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Feb 11 2021, 11:02 AM)
covid has a lot to do with it. even qualcom having issues all cos of tsmc.
*
Isn't Qualcomm also on Samsung 5nm this year?

And their power efficiency is pretty weak vs last years flagships, shows why TSMC is in high demand in spite of supply issues.
yimingwuzere
post Feb 11 2021, 02:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Feb 10 2021, 09:31 AM)
strix b550 itx, da only mobo on asus afaik everybody 3900/3950x boosted as per advertised.
*
Does the Strix X570 ITX also have problems that the B550 one doesn't?
yimingwuzere
post Feb 11 2021, 03:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(zorbyss. @ Feb 11 2021, 02:20 PM)
i personally think out of all the 5000 series chips. 5900x is the only thats actually worth the price.
5800x is EXTREMELY overpriced. I think AMD priced it on purpose to push buyer to go for 5900x instead.
*
More likely due to binning for 8 cores.

But since there's a shortage everywhere, 5800X ends up being the easiest to go for, since there's barely any 5950X anywhere on this planet, and everyone is chasing for 5900X and 5600X.

9 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2622sec    0.63    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:25 PM