price to performance ratio, the ryzen 2400 actually is not really a good deal. but the ryzen 2200 might be lacking for quite demanding games.
What do you guys think?
You must consider,
Ryzen 5 2400G is like Ryzen 5 1400, and Ryzen 5 1400 is RM 739.
Ryzen 3 2200 is around Ryzen 3 1200 and if you've actually used Ryzen 3 1200 you'll find it handles games pretty well, and does better than other processors at that price point.
The 2200G still in the end is better when it comes to "price to performance" ratio when it comes to gaming. - ryzen 2200g is 41% cheaper for only 16% - 17% less FPS vs. Ryzen 2400g
for those planning for a budget build for gaming and will not be doing video editing then ryzen 2200g would be a better bang for the buck.
Yeah pretty much.
Ryzen 5 2400G if you pair with DDR4-2400 the graphics performance goes lower than Ryzen 3 2200G with 3200.
yes the ddr4 3200 is expensive. perhaps goldfries can test benchmark between different ram speed with 2400g and 2200g in his next video which i dy subscribed to his channel? currently this apu is hot is discussion.
ehh I tested DDR4-2400 vs 3200 already, at least for the gaming benchmarks.
Updated to latest bios according to gigabyte service center technician, because they bring my board to update bios and send back. i have though of that also... but 2400G performance is identical to 1500x, and vega11 perform better than my discrete GPU on paper. Choosing 2400G = save watt, save money, quiet PC.
Nothing wrong, the Ryzen 5 2400G is an improved Ryzen 5 with reduced L3 cache.
Vega 11 vs which discrete GPU?
No matter how I tested it doesn't beat my GT 1030 / RX 550.