Not yet, just go buy a B350 ITX board.

Depends on GPU, game and settings.

My GTX 1080 for example, I see FPS difference between 2400 and 3000 range.

I'd say go with 3000 is good enough, the improvements are there but not as much (marginal) when going higher speed.

RAM price crazy wan I tell you.

RM 800 - 1200 range for a good pair.

From what I've experimented and experience so far, it doesn't have to be exact brand and / model for the RAM.

It will run dual channel as long as it's same size (and both are detected), and just run based on the lower common denominator for speed and timing.

Just to confirm before I reply here, I run my Apacer Blade Fire DDR4-3000 with G.Skill Sniper X DDR4-3466 on the same rig. They work fine in dual channel configuration.



Yes.

The reason to get exact same model, or better yet a pair kit, is to avoid compatibility issues.

You should look at the details of the review.



I've already highlighted it.

If you run Ryzen 5 2400G with DDR-2400 RAM, your Vega 11 will under perform so badly that it's behind the Vega 8 on the Ryzen 3 2200G with DDR4-3200

My benchmarks are all on dual-channel.

On single channel it makes things worse, the performance is about half of it.

Refer to the box, details are all there.

If you're running like Apacer Blade or Panther, those models are known to be able to clock higher.

You could hit 2666.

My Apacer Blade Fire DDR4-3000 can do 3466 on Intel setup.

On AMD Setup highest I reach is DDR4-3333.

To max out your Cinebench score, you need to

1. turn off as many software as possible.
2. use as high RAM speed as possible.

What's your vcore like?

And can do Cinebench / ASUS RealBench / Blender without crashing?

You can do 4.1Ghz with stock cooler.

Hrmmm, AMD specs say boost at 4.3. I've never seen it go beyond that but your readings are interesting.

Does HWinfo and Ryzen Master show the same?

That's insanely high boost.

Yup, the OC is pretty awesome but depends on your usage.

For gaming, I'd say let the XFR2 and Precision Boost do the job, games fluctuate in core usage and it does really fine on that.

For multi-core utilization, and OCed 2700X still does it better.

I tried, stock vs 4.1Ghz.

Cinebench results the 4.1Ghz OC wins on Multi-threaded but stock wins on Single-threaded.

It's an amazing processor.

I'm more concerned of your figures. If your casing temperature is like 30c or more all the time then gg it's going to melt bit by bit.

I put on casing, or desk but definitely not in casing.

Long run not good, their outer protective layer will be the first one to melt and then it becomes sticky.

Need not do, on stock is 100% confirm sure pass.

6800K old stuff. Ryzen ftw!

But still not as good as Intel for pushing framerates.

70c far from being toasty.

Temperature off-set is 10c.

ASRock has awesome Mini ITX board.

I'm using the AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac model.

Wraith Prism stock cooler stress test can see that Ryzen 7 2700X go beyond 90c.

Haven't try. My unit is running with Ryzen 7 1700.

Ryzen 7 2700 is going on other systems.

Don't think so. X370 should be able to do that as well.