QUOTE(DAViS @ Mar 7 2008, 09:39 AM)
QUOTE(PcWork @ Feb 23 2007, 06:46 PM)
SHE9500 has less isolation even compare to my normal sony earbud.
=P
it's have almost 0% isolation in she9500.
Philips and many other reputable brand like Sennheiser and AKG knowing what they are doing on their product.
Good sound isolation is bad to the end user. That is why the control the sound isolation at <85% below.
Only those new, desperate, unresponsbile company would make it totally isolation or bloated bass or sometimes hired few "gunsmen" doing marketing for their product. This tactic widely use by American and Chinese company.
QUOTE(walabies @ Mar 7 2008, 11:17 PM)
Dear Mr. Davis, if you are just coming here to post some random post bashing peoples, I suggest you are totally out of business. We never talk in your Philips tread, so do you might want to do the same.
From your post, what I get to caught your meaning is, those big companies Shures, ERs, or even Bose, Altec Lansing who is doing In Ear Phones are totally dumb to be doing 'total isolation'? Please enlighten me...
QUOTE(DAViS @ Mar 10 2008, 05:31 PM)
Please reading out more on European and US consumer association study and more.
They have recommending guideline on the headphones and earphones listening hours.
I got into this thread as I feel that something need to highlights upon some query by members about "certain" member who is stepping Philips headphones/ earphones like shit. Surprisingly I saw the two gunsmen reply to me immediately. LOL
OK I am leaving now. When talk bad about Philips please do it in PM, everybody would knowing it in public is not good since you choose doing it at your own thread.

Thank you.
well as my name were quote at the statement, i think i shall come out to clarify my personal statement.
Isolation Statement:i said that she9500 has no isolation as it doesn't isolate any sound, even compare to philips Hp890 headphone. which when i going outside with it. i have to max out the volume of my mp3 player. i can hear my ceiling fan sound even though i am in a quiet room with she9500 stick in my ear. tested with all size of the silicon bud provided. this might due to the small hole built behind the earphone is leaking too much of sound, and the silicon ear bud does not fit really tight to the earphone itself. so it's LEAK everywhere. and to be honest, besides the risk of being knock by car, i don't see any harm of good isolation, especially on high noise area.
according to ASHA & NSSLHA , there's journal published to mention that at high noise area, we shall use protective ear plug to cut down the relative high noise. so at high noise area, such as shopping complex, roads, streets; when people like to use their earphone, people tend to use their earphone over loud. and causing irreversible damage to their hearing as they can easily boost up more than 110 DB of sound.
which in this case, if one would like to use their earphone to enjoy music, i don't see why isolation is a bad issue here. infact, according to etymotic research, high isolation earbud were highly recommended to cut out the ambient noise, so that people can use their earphone to enjoy music with lower volume, rather than tune up their volume to fight / overcome the ambient noise.
which in this case, as a user of she9500, i will say that this earbud rated "passive noise canceling" had failed it's job. as Davis u also mentioned that high noise isolation is bad for end user. i wonder why philips come out with the statement passive noise canceling all over their package. other than that, philips also produce headphone with active noise canceling. which, again, i don't see any bad point of having high isolation earphone.
According to European and US consumer association study, they did recommend a guideline of headphone, and earphone listening hours, and yet again the total listening hours of earphone is VERY MUCH depend on the volume, say more than 90 dB, user are suggested to user their earphone less than 2 hours, while the volume of between 65-75dB, user can use their earphone up to 6 hours with minimum risk of damage their hearing.
once again, listening earphone at low volume / or in quiet environment is encouraged, so high isolation earphone isn't that bad idea imho.
Bloated bass statementthrough my personal experience, i found out that SHE9500 has MUCH bloated bass as compare to other iem, such as cx300, mylar, or im716.
the bloated bass of she9500 is even more than sony EX71. therefore, saying that mylar earphone has bloated bass and claim that the company is desperate, irresponsible is truly act of irresponsible seller, as you currently mislead customer without even try at the mylar earphone itself. how could you say that mylar has bloated bass while phillips she9500 does produce even much bloated bass? so in this case would you rate phillips as desperate / irresponsible manufacturer?
Gunman statementi personally used mylar 3 when my trip to sarawak for my study. isolation wise, i feel it did quite not bad job, but of couse, not up to the extend of IM716. for usual KTM riding, i think mylar3 is more than enough. as for sound quality. i feel that it's so so only (check my signature for my reference) . but it's best u can get below RM 160 with isolation, and portable enough.
recabled ksc75 on the other hand sound better than mylar series according to my personal preference. say dynamic, impact, bass quality and yada yada. BUT ksc75 does sound thin on mid range as compare to Mylar 2, while ksc75 has relatively NO isolation as it sit right above ur ear. u can even hear people gossip when u put ksc75 on without turn the music on.
so it's an give an take...
personal experience as i used the she9500, ksc75, and mylar 3 on trip to ipoh ( from serdang -> KTM -> bandar tasik selatan -> Star -> Plaza rakyat -> bus -> ipoh. )i personally disappointed with the isolation of she9500. as i have to tune up volume higher, and then at the time i get into bus, my ear is really painful.
however, personally i like ksc75 sound better than mylar 3. so my personal choice will be using mylar 3 before get on bus. and switch to ksc75 after i am in the bus and enjoy the ride.
therefore, from what i see, yuheng doesn't overstate the "good point" of the mylar3. while remain open to suggest customer about some philips headphone, or ksc75 as lower budget but yet fun headphone, ACCORDING TO WHAT A CUSTOMER NEED.
Conclusionabove statement, were written as i WAS user of both she9500, and mylar3. i am not selling both of them. so i guess there is no "gunman-ship" or bias to any of the seller. and i do hope that please do not take words i said, and use it as a statement for argument. in this way, one might possible to mislead end user. and to be honest, i will rather suggest user to get creative EP630 which cost only RM 50 at Pcfair, rather than she9500 / she9600 as it sound much better ACCORDING TO MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE.
Peace Suggestion:if DAVIS feel that walabies and yuheng were gunman, i think it's best that davis provide some test sample at yuheng place. so that customer can actually compare both philips and mylar before they decided to buy. with this. we as customer can have a relative fair comparison and know what we are looking for.
it's best to co-operate, and gain a friend, rather than adding up yourself another enemy.
or yuheng / walabies might be able to do the opposite too.
This post has been edited by PcWork: Mar 19 2008, 02:05 PM