QUOTE(kadajawi @ Sep 23 2016, 07:31 PM)
My new car has it, and I can let the display show me the oil temperature too (which is different from the other meter, and quite valuable to know).
Not having a proper meter is irresponsible, and they do it just to save a few cent. Bad for reliability if you don't know when the engine is not yet warm, and leaving it on in idle barely helps warming up the engine... you need to drive to warm it up, but you need to drive a certain way to do it without damaging it.
QUOTE(Ginny88 @ Sep 23 2016, 07:48 PM)
It's the new trend so deal with it. My Mazda 3 Skyactiv doesn't have a temp meter as well. When it is cold the temp indicator lights up as blue. When it warms up the indicator disappears. When it overheats it should light up as red.
For cars with temp indication you may be interested to know it is a dumbed down indication in order not to worry the owner. As long as the temp is within normal range the needle or figure won't move. It's designed to behave this way. The real temp actually varies depending on the ambient temp and traffic condition. I know because I plugged in an OBDII display. The temp varies from 86C to 96C but its at 88C most of the time during normal traffic.
Instead of this dumbed down temp display what's wrong with removing it? There is still an indication that the engine is cold. If things overheat up you get an alarm.
Different people got different perspective.. there's a reason why some car still have it some dont.. this depends on carmaker too..
If have i think is better, if not less thing to check.. most important both got indicator for it with different method..
If really important to u, u can put something that connects to OBD socket n can pop-up digital temperature gauge.. maybe costly but if it really does matter to u la