QUOTE(wheimeng @ May 24 2019, 10:03 AM)
We use either CTOS or RAMCI to credit screen tenant. Two situations arises:
1. Tenant failed the credit screen, there is NO penalty for landlord to abort a booking fee paid deal.
2. Tenant passed the credit screen and paid booking fee, landlord abruptly terminates the agreement. In this case, landlord faces RM1k penalty. The RM1k is a form of compensation to the qualified tenant when a landlord refuses to honor paid and signed agreement.
In this case, RAMCI didn't capture the trade reference like CTOS did. We use both for redundancy purpose, and have found that both provide very similar data set.
Currently we are extracting data from CTOS to double confirm.
If the tenant does not pass our screening, we will advise to abort the deal.
Wheimeng,
Thanks for your clarification.
Personally I like Speedrent concept; easy for landlord and tenant:-
>> direct nego between landlord and tenant, CTOS checking, monthly rent auto collect, Tenancy Agreement & stamping preparation, insurance
>> the concept is safer and better than traditional concept
but you have to improve:-
>> u have to find a way to make it informative and easy to understand the process.
>> your website error are quite some time and haven't been fixed ("error loading avatar photo" & web chat box is unable to open).
>> honestly your website is quite dull.
This post has been edited by buckbugs: May 24 2019, 11:51 AM