Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
INTEL P4/PM 478/479 THREAD, >>V3<<, The Journey Continues Here!
|
pengster
|
 Jan 20 2007, 02:09 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 20 2007, 12:48 AM) i not facing any issue on v1009 beta. 33c is nice temp. your kvr running at 166? are you sure it is 5:4? easiest way to check is by using cpuz.  i left default is running 4:5 = cpu(166):ram(200), now running 1:1 cpu(166):ram(166). unless i get 800fsb proc, if not it is no chance for me to get 5:4, 3:2 divider.  v1009beta or v1010beta?  yeap confirmed running at DDR333 dual channel.fsb:4 dram:5 divider.fsb at stock 133mhz now later shall try to get back to 150mhz 33c cuz never oc mar QUOTE(rootified @ Jan 20 2007, 01:10 PM) also socket 478.. but celeron wor... can i join? as long as its socket 478 can join edi lah  |
|
|
|
|
|
kabukiawie
|
Jan 20 2007, 03:21 PM
|
|
|
long time didnt update lo...i dont know its already having v1010 lazy to update it as now my system is rock stable. |
|
|
|
|
|
raymond5105
|
Jan 22 2007, 11:49 AM
|
|
|
Nelza is not yet back? Nelza,I have changed my TI4200 to Gecube 9550 Extreme.One more thing need to edit also,i am currently using Abit IC7-G not AI7.Thank,please help me to update in the first page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raymond5105
|
Jan 22 2007, 04:05 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(MyCJS01 @ Jan 22 2007, 12:22 PM) where to check the memory bandwidth? is this ?  I think you can use the Sandra software to test it. This Everest is just telling the max. speed that your RAM can read,write and copy. |
|
|
|
|
|
kabukiawie
|
Jan 22 2007, 04:22 PM
|
|
|
i thought everest is the same as sisoft sandra. Normally i bench memory bandwidth with sisoft. |
|
|
|
|
|
raymond5105
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:20 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 22 2007, 04:22 PM) i thought everest is the same as sisoft sandra. Normally i bench memory bandwidth with sisoft. Bench with Sandra it can tell you how much is your RAM and memory controller's efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
|
MyCJS01
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:33 PM
|
Getting Started
|
My Sandra didn`t work at all after i install it... @@ how come ..
double click it, didn`t response at all..
|
|
|
|
|
|
pengster
|
Jan 22 2007, 07:30 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(MyCJS01 @ Jan 22 2007, 05:33 PM) My Sandra didn`t work at all after i install it... @@ how come .. double click it, didn`t response at all.. what version are you using?last time when i tried to use the Pro edition same thing happened.so i just used the Lite edition which is free and works almost the same too |
|
|
|
|
|
MyCJS01
|
Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(pengster @ Jan 22 2007, 07:30 PM) what version are you using?last time when i tried to use the Pro edition same thing happened.so i just used the Lite edition which is free and works almost the same too pro edition @@, last year i still can run this program..  i still remember it.. but now dont know why cant already.. thx |
|
|
|
|
|
pengster
|
Jan 22 2007, 08:22 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(MyCJS01 @ Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM) pro edition @@, last year i still can run this program.. i still remember it.. but now dont know why cant already.. thx same here.last year still can open it.but then now cant already.must be they're cracked down on illegal Pro copies |
|
|
|
|
|
kabukiawie
|
Jan 23 2007, 08:32 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(MyCJS01 @ Jan 22 2007, 05:33 PM) My Sandra didn`t work at all after i install it... @@ how come .. double click it, didn`t response at all.. after reinstall still the same problem? i faced the problem before.  at last just install newer lite version now running fine QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Jan 23 2007, 08:18 AM) My new Super PI 1M result. wa........38s  , mission impossible for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
raymond5105
|
Jan 23 2007, 09:13 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 23 2007, 08:32 AM) after reinstall still the same problem? i faced the problem before. at last just install newer lite version now running fine wa........38s , mission impossible for me. My RAM sometimes is limiting me,else i might go for higher frequency. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Jan 23 2007, 03:01 PM
|
|
|
i see that Socket 478 is still living on strong Version 3 already great to see that there are more ppl joining in this time  |
|
|
|
|
|
MyCJS01
|
Jan 23 2007, 03:25 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 23 2007, 08:32 AM) after reinstall still the same problem? i faced the problem before. at last just install newer lite version now running fine wa........38s , mission impossible for me. ya, after reinstall the problem still there.. dl a free version already, lite.. so, how about my memory bandwidth ? 71% only  This post has been edited by MyCJS01: Jan 23 2007, 03:26 PM Attached thumbnail(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
raymond5105
|
Jan 23 2007, 03:43 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(MyCJS01 @ Jan 23 2007, 03:25 PM) ya, after reinstall the problem still there.. dl a free version already, lite.. so, how about my memory bandwidth ? 71% only I cannot use the new lite version,install already and run the program nothing come out.  Weired. I use back the 2005 lite version. |
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Jan 23 2007, 04:21 PM
|
|
|
Its normal if u get 71% bandwidth efficiency, mine also same thing at 1:1
If you want higher, use 5:4 instead
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSnelza_ax
|
Jan 23 2007, 04:35 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Jan 23 2007, 08:18 AM) My new Super PI 1M result. heyy..im back now! so sorry, long time didnt update.. i'll update everything tonite  btw.. nice result there!..  |
|
|
|
|
|
KahLooN
|
Jan 23 2007, 04:40 PM
|
|
|
@MyCJS01 Is normal for the efficiency around 70+% region, perhaps you can try to tighten the ram timing to 2-3-3-5. Since you are using Intel motherboard, no way you can overclock it. If not, you can try the one sofeware to alter the memory setting but i forgotten the name of it. |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0297sec
0.55
6 queries
GZIP Disabled