INTEL P4/PM 478/479 THREAD, >>V3<<, The Journey Continues Here!
INTEL P4/PM 478/479 THREAD, >>V3<<, The Journey Continues Here!
|
|
Jan 3 2007, 08:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
So fast comes to V3 already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 3 2007, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2007, 02:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 3 2007, 11:11 PM) i know, but not stable at 170fsb++, highest can go to 180++. Too bad, the steping not good at oc. If get same steping like nelza's D1 steping, at least can pump till 3.5GHz at stock. i try 188fsb just now, heres the screenchots [attachmentid=175157] [attachmentid=175158] at last, 40sec. QUOTE(PeowYong @ Jan 4 2007, 02:20 AM) my rig I found that A version proc is better in Super PI 1M compare to the E version.A version is slighly slower than the E version though.[attachmentid=175218] Pentium 4 2.8E@ 3.4GHz Thermalright Ultra-120 paired with Thermaltake 120mm fan @ 2400rpm ABIT IC7 2x Kingston d43 DDR400 @ 2.5 3 3 6 HIS ATI Radeon 9600XT Powerlogic Atrix 500T full load temp 69°c cant get 39s in superpi using vista |
|
|
Jan 4 2007, 05:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 4 2007, 03:36 PM) of coz slower as the fsb is lower and lack of HT, E version is 800fsb, A version is 533fsb non HT. at the same speed there is no way that A version will outperform E version in most case. But the difference is the A version is slightly faster than the E version although the E version has higher clock speed and using 1:1 divider.A version is using 5:4 divider so resulting the RAM running at lower speed. You can refer the post screens on page 2. |
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 09:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(siauann @ Jan 5 2007, 10:10 AM) haha..u wan try ka? i sell u lor... Wah siauann,your board still haven't tested out ? offer me ur price lar..i sell u cheap cheap...thn u got the legendary board n top the results here |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
@ irangan,your proc now running at 3.9GHz sure very very shock in gaming one.
This post has been edited by raymond5105: Jan 5 2007, 02:17 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 08:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
siauann you MAX 3 only selling for RM150 ? That's preety cheap .
|
|
|
Jan 8 2007, 09:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(irangan @ Jan 8 2007, 12:03 AM) did that... the best i can get is from 225FSB, 3 4 4 8 to 225FSB, 2 3 3 5. i can go 225FSB 2 3 2 5 but sometime cant boot and sometime can. not sure why. Wah your RAM can go with 2-3-3-5 timing,that's very nice.I think your RAM maybe can't get the 2-3-2-5 as the RAM's limitation or the chipset's limitation.though, my mobo is 875P but no match in term of OC if compare to your IC7 Max. sigh. BUT i have 6 ram slots! hehe about the ram, yes it is a very nice ram especially with its very cheap price. |
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 06:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(irangan @ Jan 9 2007, 04:20 PM) Idle temp = 32-33'C Full Load = 42-43'C Wao going to 3.9GHz, 1.6Vcore, that is the max my mobo can go. if can, i wishes to pump 1.9V and see my processor go 4ghz+ haha.. p.s. with my current ram, i can go 3.9Ghz with 5:4 and 3.82Ghz with 1:1 |
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 09:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Pengster your memory only able to run in DDR300?Is it your original RAM speed is running at DDR266?Your northwood core should be able to reach at least 3.0GHz with good settings.
|
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 07:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jan 10 2007, 07:17 PM) It all depends on the ram's bandwidth efficiency and of course for SuperPI, the 1MB cache does help a lot in high frequencies, we Northwood users will lose. Yaya recently i discovered that using tighter timing on my RAM does boost a bit on the Super PI. For mine, my 5:4 ratio scores better than my 1:1 ratio in Sandra and SuperPI |
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 08:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(pengster @ Jan 10 2007, 08:01 PM) erm just a question.if my ram's timings are too tight for my mobo,will it cause my whole pc to freeze up? Yaya,unsuitable RAM timing will causing your pc to freeze.Especially those tight timing like 2-x-x-x . If want to use those tight timing,need very good and high performance RAM.I see irangan's RAM also can run at tight timing nicely.I guess his value RAM is the best in terms of performance and value in tight timing setting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(pengster @ Jan 10 2007, 09:28 PM) oh okay...my timings too tight edi You can try to run on both and see how is it. Of course 1.5GB RAM will be the best for your system.But if want to talk about overclocking need to see which pair of RAM does better.oh yeah guyz i just got my DDR400 ram from irangan [nice guy |
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 09:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(overclockalbert @ Jan 12 2007, 04:20 AM) just to share my new OC with 2.8E Wao overclockabert,nice to see you can acheive 3.7GHz. 2.8@3.712@5:4@265.15@212.12 superPi 1M at 38S all this with Clockgen and finished in window. this OC is fully stable with dual sp2004 no error for 4 hours and memtest 2 hours no error. i think my IC7-Max3 still can go higher--->4Ghz barrier! i'll do the VTT mod next week. currently my Vdimm is max out at 2.8V. my Corsair UTT BH5 willing to suck more of it. Running at 5:4 really can show that my 2.8G can fly high. i'll post the new result as soon as i get the VTT mod done. |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 09:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(overclockalbert @ Jan 13 2007, 01:32 AM) i'm gathering all the infomation i got to perform the VTT mod on my IC7 MAX3 in order to run my UTT BH5 at 3.2V. Vmodding need really expert work as it involves soldering work on board. i'll need fellow forumer here to help me gather as much information as possible as to complete the MOD. i also found out that a Droop Mod also helps to stablelize Vcore and Vdimm to help OC more success. you help is most welcome.thanks QUOTE(shinjite @ Jan 13 2007, 05:02 PM) 34 seconds in Northwood is equalavent to 4Ghz range. Remember he is using phase cooling 34s is preety fast.The fastest i can get on mine system is 38s with 3.712GHz with 1:1 divider @231FSB on my board. Using phase cooling only gives little boost on the PI result,that's hard to believe also.But Northwood will be max out at 4GHz,i guess that is the best he can done already. If you play around normally in desktop, you won't feel any difference, most of it will be in benchmarks. So if u disable your DC, expect lower scores then.... |
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 12:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 08:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Jan 14 2007, 08:45 PM) benchmark no mean real performance. I thought the Asus P4P800-X should be able to support the Cl3 RAM. pengster, you have the case case as mine, run 1:1 with c3 it wont boot since you can run 3 sticks on 2.7GHz, just carry on. |
|
|
Jan 17 2007, 01:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(rainingzero @ Jan 17 2007, 09:45 AM) ooo..can use thi software to oc my ancient rig arr??will try it later... I don't think this mobo can do any overclocking on it. Not even the softfsb or clockgen unless you change the motherboard.edit:looks like i can't find softfsb which support my intel865perl.... anyone wanna sell their overclockable mobo to me?? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0391sec
1.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 09:33 AM |