QUOTE(Jonno @ Jan 19 2008, 01:13 AM)
I hate to say this, but Ronaldo, if he has his head crewed on properly (which recent times showed that he still need some sense knock into him), can be like an Henry who plays from the right or left, or even better, but the only thing is that like Henry, he tends to go missing in big games which is why Kaka was rated above him (couldn't be arsed to go up and read the spat). Kaka often influence matches, altough being shackled by other players he'd stillbe able to influence the game, compare to Ronaldo who has gone missing one too many times in big matches. I know I'd get knocked by his supporters when I say this, but please do point out matches, I mean big matches where he has a big say in it or influence it properly. 
Off the top of my head...Roma 7-1
Roma away which we lost 2-1, Ronaldo was one of our brightest spark and it was his run which was intrumental in getting Rooney's goal
Milan at home last season
Arsenal 4-2 season 04/05
Liverpool at home, Rio Ferdinand's comeback game
Arsenal at home 0-0, same game which ruud was attacked by Arse players. Ronaldo was one of our brightest sparks
Arsenal FA Cup final which we lost on penalties. Ronaldo was basically tormenting Arsenal again and again and again, Ruud didn't have his shooting boots on though.
Arse at home this season, scored 1, made another
I don't disagree with the fact that Kaka influence matches but I do think that saying Kaka is better than Ronaldo because he won the FIFA Player of The Year award is ridiculous really. The award is shambles. Why did Kaka win??? Is it because he won the CL?? His domestic season was somewhat poor last season, ditto this season. Messi over Ronaldo was just ridiculous for starters considering Messi was out for 2-3 months last season and Barca won nothing. Messi had a few nice goals, probably won Most Youtubed Goal award or something but that was it.
Luiz Ronaldo won it on the back of 13 games for Inter Milan and a successful World Cup considering that they were players with even better year at the time i.e. the likes of Henry. But it was given to Ronaldo because many thought football was just glad to have one of it's gems back.
As a pointed out earlier, someone on here said I seem to think that the award is shambles because Ronaldo didn't win it. Well the likes of Cantona, Giggsy, Scholesy, Becks, Keano and Ruud never won it when there were times in their career they could have a shout and it never bothered me one bit, so why should I be bothered by it now??
Jan 19 2008, 01:32 AM

Quote
0.0538sec
0.54
6 queries
GZIP Disabled