Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 PlayStation 4™ Community Official Thread | V14, PS4 Pro Announced - $399 (November 10th)

views
     
SSJBen
post Sep 8 2016, 06:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Here's my 2 cents on the PS4 Pro.

The Good
- Sony pushing HDR and HDR is indeed a game changer, it's more impactful than 4k res IMO.
- The price is right, $400/RM1799 is a good balance ground.
- Checkerboard upscaling is actually built into the GPU, so it isn't software post-process based like what Quantum Break uses on the Xbone. This means devs can just flip the switch on and off on their dev tools, then optimize accordingly.
- 4k upscaling is a good move and I'm glad Sony is making it mandatory that every game works on the PS4 and the PS4 Pro with various "modes".
- Polaris architecture is the right move, tbh I had some worries that Sony would use a Fiji based GPU like the R9 Nano but with much lower GPU clocks.


The Bad
- No UHD Blu-Ray drive. This is a seriously stupid omission. Most modern 4k smart TVs can stream Netflix at 4k, why the hell is Netflix 4k a selling point on the PS4 Pro? Also, 4k streaming is pretty shit on Netflix, it's barely comparable to a full 1080p Blu-Ray iso.
- A UHD BR drive adds $15-$22 cost production. Of course if you look at it on a big scale manufacturing, that is a lot of money. But the xbone S has a UHD drive, so if one wants to argue that the PS4 Pro would then have to be priced higher than $400, why isn't the PS4 slim which costs the same as the xbone S have a UHD drive then?
- Sony is promising the moon, but will probably end up giving us the cheese. Remember the PS4 unveiling 3 years ago? 1080p gaming blah blah blah, today we have the PS4 struggling to maintain 30fps on most games.
- Because Sony wants to release the PS4 Pro this year, it really mean that they have no competitor to the Xbox Scorpio. The PS4 Pro is using an underclocked RX 480, a Polaris card. The Scorpio will use presumably, AMD's Vega architecture next year. I feel that Sony is shooting themselves in the foot again, where in the original PS4 they should have gone with a HD7870 based GPU instead of a HD7850 GPU.


Misc.
If we forget about the PS4 Pro being a 4k upscaling machine (lelz), but look at it solely as a 1080p60 machine with mostly maxed out visuals on most games, then I feel that the PS4 Pro makes sense at this point, today. Doubling it as the actual companion to the PSVR is also a very sensible choice, because frankly speaking; the PS4 just can't do intensive VR.

TVs then, HDR is a game changer indeed, but be aware that you really need a TV equipped with a HDR hardware processor and not just backlight trickery to produce HDR content properly.
Majority of the 4k TVs today, entry level and up to mainstream mid-range models DO NOT have the necessary HDR hardware to process HDR10 content to its maximum detail. Netflix HDR yes (SMPTE ST2084), but unless games uses the same subpar standard then what most people would see on TV like the Sony X85D is a limited range of HDR (which is ironic).

TV choice will be critical guys and unfortunately, the 4k TVs that really have all the bells and whistles for proper HDR processing, low input lag, and amazing PQ - they cost A LOT. Here's hoping come CES 2017 there will be more midrange 4k TVs with high-end features in them.


Do not buy a PS4 Pro because you want it as a 4k upscaling console or buying into the HDR hype without having the actual equipment to see it in its full glory. Buy the PS4 Pro if your current PS4 breaks or buy it if there will be plenty of games doing 1080p60 OR; buy it to compliment the PSVR.

SSJBen
post Sep 8 2016, 07:26 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(justified @ Sep 8 2016, 07:21 PM)
i have ps4 whch i bought 2 months ago.. is it worth upgrade to ps4 SLIM ? any specs diff etc other than the ps4 controller?
*
The best PS4 model to buy is the current PS4s, not the slim. Why would you want to sacrifice the optical output even if you don't use it? If size is a concern, the PS4 slim isn't a whole lot smaller than the PS4 anyways.
SSJBen
post Sep 8 2016, 07:27 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Oh and it looks like Sony just doesn't learn from their mistakes? The PS4 Pro uses touch capacitive buttons for the Power/Eject switches. Prepare yourself for more 3 beeps and phantom disc ejects.
SSJBen
post Sep 9 2016, 01:26 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(dragontongue88 @ Sep 9 2016, 12:02 AM)
Seriously? Now this is a major concern for me. Pretty dumb by Sony.  bangwall.gif

Here  I was thinking that I'll kill two birds with one stone with the ps4 pro, get a better console and get rid of the auto eject problem permanently. mega_shok.gif

I also wonder if FF XV will run smoother (1080p) on the Pro. If so, I'm kind of tempted to get the Pro early before FF XV is out.
*
Because XV releases after October 1st, it is required to have a PS4 Pro "mode". Tabata has also said previously that they will most probably have a patch for the mid-gen consoles (PS4 Pro and presumably Xbox Scorpio).

Safe to assume that yes, XV should run smoother on the PS4 Pro.


QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Sep 9 2016, 12:21 AM)
it's hard to justify for now. judging from the renders, the buttons were moved from the bottom to the center part, which is unlikely to trigger auto eject UNLESS if it is again, a design flaw

for some references...

user posted image

Hi Res Image

EDIT : PS - im still proud that my current one is not affected by auto eject even after 18 months of use!
*
The auto eject issue is caused by static between the metal piece on the casing and the contact plate on the motherboard, not just the rubber foot. Moving the buttons to the center doesn't solve the issue if they are still using the the static shot method. If they want to use touch buttons, then they should go back to the PS3 phat design where the entire contact point is a single piece. Won't know until it launches and teardowns has been done.
SSJBen
post Sep 9 2016, 06:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(shin gouki @ Sep 9 2016, 02:10 PM)
it really sucks that ps4 slim does not have optical output for my digital speaker. now i can only choose from ps4 fat or ps4 pro ><'
*
1) Wait for PS4 slim launch.
2) Watch for PS4 "old" price drops like rock.
3) Buy PS4 old.
4) Profit.

Don't stress for nothing.
SSJBen
post Sep 10 2016, 09:13 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


user posted image


List of confirmed games from the Asia press that will receive a PS4 Pro patch at or slightly after launch.

Not sure why it wasn't posted.
SSJBen
post Sep 11 2016, 02:08 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Just hope that after the first wave of games having a 1080p60 mode and an upscaled 4k mode, the next wave of games (coming mid to late 2017) will not just focus on upscaled 4k and HDR, but forget 1080p users. That would be a bummer, but not entirely out of equation.
SSJBen
post Sep 11 2016, 02:44 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


We have ipongs being priced at more than RM4k and still selling like goreng pisang panas... PS4 Pro is only 1.8k at its SRP, big freaking deal. sweat.gif
SSJBen
post Sep 13 2016, 11:00 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Sep 13 2016, 09:28 AM)
too many games i'm eyeing with PS4Pro (P4P? laugh.gif ) enhancements to ignore the upgrade sleep.gif

also tempted by Samsung KS7500 with it's 21ms input lag-bugger even lower than my current Sony (22ms) sweat.gif
...and ofcourse there's also this possibility sleep.gif
*
We don't know yet what the so called enhancements will be. Higher frames? Cool, but how much higher and are they locked? Better visuals? Cool again, but how much better?

At this point, it isn't a good time to buy a TV. The KS7500 ticks a lot of check boxes for the ideal gaming TV, but its input lag under HDR condition isn't concrete.

CES 2017 is just a few months away btw.
SSJBen
post Sep 13 2016, 05:14 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(angel-girl @ Sep 13 2016, 02:20 PM)
was looking at X75D / X70D
*
The X70/75D are not HDR-spec TVs, at least they aren't actually certified to be under the UHD Premium Alliance. HDR10 requires a TV to have a minimum of 1000 nits brightness in a 2% window. For reference, the X70/X75D tops out at 340 nits, way below reference.

Also understand that the vast majority of mid-range 4k TVs do not actually have the hardware required to process HDR metadata. What this means is that the wrong color space is usually used (approximation) and due to how many mid-range TVs are using edge LEDs as their backlight, sources can and will look over exposed or washed out often times.

As a side note, the only Sony TV available in Malaysia now that conforms to the HDR10 spec is the X93D series. The Z9D series will follow suit in a few weeks time when it releases. Sony also uses their own HDR spec instead of one conformed by multiple bodies in the industry.

Don't buy into the marketing hype and bs. HDR is important and when done right, is indeed amazing. Do the research first and if anything, don't buy a TV now.
SSJBen
post Sep 13 2016, 08:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


The x800/x850d, just like the x700/750d series are not true to spec HDR TVs. Again I reiterate, they are capable of displaying HDR content but they lack the proficiency in being good at doing so.

More over they use mediocre IPS panels, so contrast ratio is pretty poor. HDR so what? The blacks would like grey dirt.

Don't bother with Sony TVs this year.
SSJBen
post Sep 14 2016, 12:56 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ohmyenglish @ Sep 13 2016, 11:37 PM)
Is my js9000 65" capable of displaying the hdr10? I do know tat it has some hdr feature, but not sure if it's up to the latest standard?
*
It can accept and display HDR content, however like the majority of TVs; it lacks the hardware to do it properly. Also, its max brightness tops out at only 460 nits. Not even half of what HDR10 requires.
SSJBen
post Sep 14 2016, 01:33 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ohmyenglish @ Sep 14 2016, 07:56 AM)
Ic, it's pretty crazy how TV techs develop so fast. It's not even a year old and it's aldy got phased out... @@''
*
Not really, TV tech has been stagnant since 2009 all the way up until 2014. It was 5 years of rehashed technology on each subsequent year, with more and more bs marketing talk sprinkled over another.

It was only in 2014 when 4k TVs started to become mainstream. Unfortunately, 2015 and 2016 has became the years where we are in the middle of transitioning from 1080p to 4k + HDR. This will continue through out 2017 I believe and it'll really only be in 2018 where mid range 4k TVs will have most of the bells and whistles of their higher end brothers.

Your TV wasn't phased out, it just wasn't even built to be future proof in any way in the first place, putting it bluntly.
SSJBen
post Sep 14 2016, 04:28 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(GameSky @ Sep 14 2016, 01:49 PM)
current patch enable hdr..but most game belum update lagi...so no effect yet oi..
*
Got effect so what? Find me a 1080p HDR capable TV. None existent right?

So then that means PS4 "old" users are stuck with playing their PS4s on a 4k HDR TV, but running without a hardware upscale like the PS4 Pro does. Might as well don't bother.

Games are a no go then, what about movies? Well, because Sony is so damn smart not to include a UHD drive on the PS4 slim, then that means everyone is stuck with good ol' 1080p Blu-Ray. The problem? There isn't a single 1080p Blu-Ray movie that employs HDR.

HDR on the PS4 is as pointless as it gets.
SSJBen
post Sep 15 2016, 03:05 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(uzary @ Sep 15 2016, 09:36 AM)
I always wondering how does the ori ps4 performed on 4k tv? Does the upscale effect framerates? How does the pic quality?
*
A PS4 plays exactly the same way it would on a 4k TV vs a 1080p TV. The internal resolution will be determined by the devs for a game, then output as is and then upscaled by a 4k TV. Performance is unchanged between a 1080p TV and 4k TV.

Many 4k TVs since 2015 has done a remarkable job in upscaling 1080p content. To my eyes, aside from some perceiveable softness to overall picture quality, playing a 1080p game on a 4k TV is pretty much as good as playing it on a 1080p TV itself.


QUOTE(deyamato @ Sep 15 2016, 11:07 AM)
Im still not planning for getting 4k TV but main processor does it see any improvement difference between PRO and standard ps4 ?
*
QUOTE(iguana_dude_619 @ Sep 15 2016, 11:32 AM)
for now we only it is faster clock then original. what CPU or how fast is still mystery  laugh.gif
*
It's not a mystery. CPU remains the same 'Jaguar' cores but has gotten a boost to clock speed. The PS4 Pro's CPU runs at 2.1ghz vs the 1.6ghz on the PS4.

Unfortunately, an extra 500mhz isn't going to be significant.
The Jaguar cores are just sloooow out of the gate. There are people who has OC'd them on their laptop counterparts up to 3ghz even, but the increase in performance isn't anything to shout about.


QUOTE(Mubarak90 @ Sep 15 2016, 11:51 AM)
Correct, I think even the slim is actually different from the original PS4. Probably a 900MHz Polaris 11 GPU, with also checkerboard rendering for 1080p. biggrin.gif
*
Not correct.

The slim PS4 uses the EXACT same CPU as the "phat" PS4. The GPU is the same as well, based on the Pitcairn architecture.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Sep 15 2016, 03:09 PM
SSJBen
post Sep 15 2016, 04:04 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Mubarak90 @ Sep 15 2016, 03:54 PM)
I just saw the video from Digital Foundry, and they have found out that the PS4 Slim is actually operating under lower power requirement when compared to both the previously release PS4 (1 noisy fan, another not noisy fan). If it is the exact same SOC, it couldn't behave differently right? biggrin.gif
*
The lower power consumption is due to a process node shrink. The CPU's performance is still unchanged other than the devkit updates that Sony has implemented a couple of months ago, of which applies to all PS4s.
SSJBen
post Sep 17 2016, 04:31 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(dARKaNGEl @ Sep 17 2016, 03:34 PM)
Crap I think my ps4 power supply is busted. Had not been playing for at least 3 mths and now can't get it to on. Whenever pressed the power button, it will beep once and the blue light will come on and then goes off again. Tried many things from what ppl asked to try online but not working.
Anyone here knows what's the typical coat to get it repaired and where I can get it fixed? Think need to change the power supply.
My unit should be 2 years plus so way over warranty coverage period.

Thanks
*
Check which is your PS4 model, then get the corresponding PSU replacement - https://www.ifixit.com/Store/Guide/24719

Fortunately, the PS4's PSU is quite modular. Just open the bottom and top casing, remove the PSU cable and some screws then pop it off. Then replace it with the new PSU, very simple to do (it's actually even easier to replace than a PC PSU since cable management is not needed).
SSJBen
post Sep 17 2016, 09:30 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Lynixx @ Sep 17 2016, 07:41 PM)
guys, regarding the newly added HDR setting, did you guys set as automatic?

i noticed the colors are abnormal if i set as automatic.
*
You set it 'off'. Even if your TV is HDR capable, the game has to have a HDR mode in order to display HDR values.
SSJBen
post Sep 24 2016, 02:16 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Batmobile96 @ Sep 24 2016, 12:09 PM)
Just being curious. Some of the game shop offered a buy back of the old ps4 and to trade with the ps4 slim or ps4 pro. And I can see a lot of people are actually trading their old ps4 with the slim/pro version. Once the pro and slim version launched, is there anyone else still would like to get the old version? Why would the game shop would like to accept the old ps4 for? Is that really worth to trade the old with the pro version?
*
Because it's cheaper to buy old PS4s and salvage the PSU, Blu-ray drive, and HDD as repair parts than to get them from some unknown China source.


SSJBen
post Sep 25 2016, 01:22 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(nill @ Sep 24 2016, 05:49 PM)
just curious. can i use parts of old PS4 to fix PS4Pro?
or you mean fixing old PS4 only?
*
Most probably not. Most parts on the Pro has a different design, including the Blu-ray drive.

QUOTE(lp16 @ Sep 25 2016, 01:09 PM)
No CC from those banks cry.gif

But I kept seeing reviewers saying unless we hv a 4K or going to hv a 4K TV, it's not much advantage getting a Pro.

But then again, no harm getting a unit that is future proof...

So, Slim or Pro? To Pro or not to Pro.....
*
As if reviewers know best. The PS4 Pro isn't even future proofed, just like the current PS4. It'll run out of steam by the end of next year.

It's logical to get a pro if you don't own any ps4 at the moment, just so if games at 1080p will be better.


5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0911sec    0.68    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 03:20 PM