I watched the video but did not see the TOW go to the side. It hit directly on the turret. I'm not sure why they said it went to the side.

The T90 survived thanks to its armor.

but look like the crew run away abandon the tank.

RUSSIAN AIRGROUP AT HMEIMIM RECEIVES REINFORCEMENTS







http://warfiles.ru/show-110181-rossiya-per...tiem-il-76.html

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Feb 29 2016, 07:25 AM

Probably scared tank will brew up like their older T-62 and T-72s. If the few SAA T-90s are such prized assets, I think at least must install 1 Russian crew inside each T-90 tank, to make sure the tank is operated correctly and the surrounding infantry could be deployed in a proper manner.

Putin did it, not US, Israelis or aliens? CNN ‘expert’ solves MH370 mystery with hint from chickens







https://www.rt.com/news/333908-mh370-blame-putin-conspiracy/

Australia Is Giving Up on Its Tiger Gunships, Which Have Never Seen Combat





http://warisboring.com/articles/australia-...er-seen-combat/

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20160228_02/

This post has been edited by azriel: Feb 29 2016, 08:33 AM

Maybe we can buy this?

I wonder why the aussie can't achieved final operational capability for the Tiger attack helicopter even after 8 years?
Is it suppliers problem? Customers problem? Or combination of both?

80% discount would be a good deal

nearly every single plane from their airforce is from USA, with only a few tankers from airbus recently and as for rotary/land vehicles from the army it is the same... m1s, m113, bell, chinook, blackhawk.. their 2 recent eu purchases... tiger n nh90 ended up with lots of problems... basically waste of time n $$$

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v8/bm/bu/ne....php?id=1219595

Don't underestimate need for strong military



It is unfortunate that those who have very little knowledge of military history and defence matters have made general comments on Singapore's defence policy ("Open debate needed on defence policy" by Dr Paul Tambyah of the Singapore Democratic Party; yesterday).

Singapore veterans who have been through World War II and Konfrontasi would remember their experiences during those difficult periods.

The former period, in 1942, showed how unprepared the armed forces were to face the onslaught of the Japanese troops.

However, the latter period proved that, with a strong military that included modern naval, air force and army assets, the British and Commonwealth forces could successfully defend Malaysia and Singapore, and deter then Indonesian President Sukarno from carrying out his expansionist plans.

A strong military is a strong deterrent, which is important for Singapore's defence.

We should never be so naive as to think that all will be well in the region in future years.

Jealousies and aggressive policies could develop.

But such adversaries would be deterred by our strong and modern military that can not only protect, but also reach out to targets in potential enemy territories.

There are some who think that the years spent in national service should be further reduced, but this is unhealthy thinking.

As our population dwindles in numbers, we also need to train our military with the most advanced military technology to ensure an active and robust deterrent force.

This priority includes the possible purchase of the F-35 jets or whatever advanced aircraft is finally chosen for the Republic of Singapore Air Force.

We have our defence experts and scientists to make the necessary assessments wisely for future needs.

It is important not to believe in hearsay.

It is naive to think that the situation could not change in neighbouring countries, and that we will always have peace in the region.

The number of terrorism hot spots and the threat from militant groups in neighbouring countries have increased.

We can ensure the well-being of our citizens as well as foreign investors only when their interests are secure.

This guarantee can be ensured if we continue to have a strong defence policy encompassing a strong, high-tech military deterrent force.

Adrian Villanueva

http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-...strong-military

Singapore must be like a porcupine



As well-intentioned as some defence scientists may be in questioning our purchase of expensive aircraft, they do not fully understand the threats that our little red dot faces ("Open debate needed on defence policy" by Dr Paul Tambyah; last Friday and "Don't underestimate need for strong military" by Mr Adrian Villanueva; last Saturday).

The threats that we face are multi-faceted.

Unless our defence forces are strong, anyone can walk in and destroy all that we have built over the past 50 years.

It is easy to argue for a cut in defence spending. However, once we go down that route, there is no return.

New Zealand is a classic example.

At its peak, the Royal New Zealand Air Force was a force to be reckoned with, and was active in the Pacific theatre during the war.

After the war ended, the air force was reduced as part of a defence spending cut.

It no longer has any capacity to exert its air superiority.

While New Zealand is fortunate to be located at the far end of the earth, Singapore is different.

It would be naive to believe that when Singaporeans are happy, they will naturally step up and quash any hints of terrorism - domestic or otherwise.

As a major financial and trading centre, we are highly vulnerable.

Any hint of trouble will affect our survival and lead to an exodus of foreign talents and companies. That will spell the end of Singapore.

Singapore must remain like a porcupine. The hawks and eagles swarming around will not dare to swoop down on us, knowing the excruciating pain we can inflict on them.

Patrick Tan Siong Kuan

http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-...ike-a-porcupine

Strong defence budget key to S'pore's survival






In his letter of Jan 29 ("Open debate needed on defence policy"), Dr Paul Tambyah criticised my call in Parliament for strong defence and Home Team budgets.

Dr Tambyah reiterated proposals to cut the defence spending by more than 40 per cent, which was put forward by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) in 2012 and during the 2015 General Election.

In my view, to propose such a 40 per cent reduction is at total odds with the capricious regional environment Singapore finds itself in today. Several fellow Singaporeans also voiced their disagreement with Dr Tambyah's views ("Don't underestimate need for strong military" by Mr Adrian Villanueva, Jan 30; and "S'pore must be like a porcupine" by Mr Patrick Tan Siong Kuan, Feb 2).

In a subsequent letter, Dr Tambyah questioned how arming our armed forces will help in the fight against terrorism ("Strong defence needed, but not excessive spending"; Feb 6).

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) is a key pillar of our nation's anti-terrorism effort, alongside the Home Team and the Internal Security Department.

In 1991, when SQ117 was hijacked, it was the SAF Commandos who stormed the aircraft, eliminating all terrorists on board. Not one civilian life was lost.

The Sept 11, 2001 attacks revealed how commercial aircraft could be hijacked as weapons. The SAF can respond to a similar episode, if it ever occurs in Singapore.

The Mumbai attacks in 2008 showed us how terrorists can also launch their attacks from the sea. Innocent civilians were killed, including a Singaporean. In Singapore, we need the coordinated efforts of our Navy, Police Coast Guard and other maritime agencies to deter such attacks.

Dr Tambyah also missed one crucial point I made during my speech in Parliament - that we must never take our sovereignty for granted. We must have the military wherewithal and alliances to stave off threats to our sovereignty, quite apart from terrorist attacks.

Can a strong SAF and Home Team guarantee that we will never have a terrorist attack here in Singapore?

No country and no institution can guarantee that. But we can give Singapore the optimum chance to deter attacks or reduce the loss of life, with the best available equipment and infrastructure to augment our determined security forces.

The steady defence spending over the years has built up the SAF into one of the most respected and professional militaries in this region. A strong SAF that is able to protect Singapore gives the added assurance that Singapore's sovereignty, independence and security will be guarded, even when others seek to do us harm.

I do not agree with Dr Tambyah or the SDP's proposal to reduce defence spending by 40 per cent, and will continue to call for budgets to build strong security forces to protect Singapore and its sovereignty.

Christopher de Souza

MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC

http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-...?xtor=EREC-16-1[ST_Newsletter_AM]-20160229-[Strong+defence+budget+key+to+S%27pore%27s+survival]&xts=538291

so problem could be from maintenance failing to differentiate imperial and metric measurement units to just plain accessories dont fit (ie. fuel pumps ) ?

they buy first batch as customize reconnaissance spec to replace OH-58, with limited unit, some parts are slow and some need send back to euro to repair. so serviceability is low. by right they can get mid life upgrade on 2020, but they give up, plan replace small reconnaissance helicopter like Ah-6i or MD-530G which more and easy fit in C-17
If our Army plan getting it, we should upgrade to Tiger HAD /HAD II spec which is full Attack Helicopter spec, widely use by France (also Spain) in Mali and Afghanistan.
plus Airbus have south east Asia parts center, and service center, support should no big issue.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 29 2016, 12:59 PM

Supply chain issue

Or typical airbus.. product nvr work the first time delivered

you're smarter than aussies

Has Russia's T-90 Tank Really Made TOW Missiles Obsolete in Syria?















http://sputniknews.com/military/20160228/1...ow-missile.html

Russian TV crew films Turkish fortifications, tanks on Syrian border (PHOTOS, VIDEO)







https://www.rt.com/news/333911-turkey-syria-border-military/

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Feb 29 2016, 06:10 PM