Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V19
|
Bombgen
|
Jan 14 2016, 06:56 AM
|
|
QUOTE(QD_buyer @ Jan 14 2016, 01:59 AM) Comparing to SAF , our trainings are harsher . You'll never know that you can get hypothermia during the normal Serang Hendap routines . Imagine lying on the jungle floor during raining season plus the midnight cold for 18-24 hours , your hand starts to get numb and you couldnt even feel your limbs . Damn I really hate latihan medan because of this . Thats why all Malaysian Army are crackheads . Wanna compare us to SAF ? Give them any one of our RSMs from the infantry regiments , they would scare the hell out of the SAF . Of course Malaysian will say Malaysian army is better than Singapore army, and another way around. Why need such comparison? . We're neighbour, we shouldn't scare each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Jan 14 2016, 10:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Jan 14 2016, 08:48 AM) come i clap for you  but sorry harsher dont win you wars... neway, it will be an endless debate.. more like penis waggin without opening the zip crackheads? more like pot bellies.. neway, i wont debate.. its not a conducive platform and it will be endless sad for you.. suck a weakling Soldiers effectiveness is how they apply technology with the situation. Good manpower+technology integration wins the war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 10 2016, 07:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Feb 10 2016, 04:56 PM) Three confirmed died in Indonesian air force plane crash [sos] ' Eject and still die, can someone explain? I mean is it too late or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 11 2016, 09:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 11 2016, 12:07 AM) injury during ejection or after ejection. most of death/injury occur during ejection. That is a problem with Martin Baker seats compare to the Russian seats Head injury? Leg injury?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 11 2016, 09:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(gary345 @ Feb 11 2016, 06:53 AM) I just hope China would join in as well. Can't miss out the oil there... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRi95MZSWswYou think war is fun?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 11 2016, 09:52 AM
|
|
QUOTE(gary345 @ Feb 11 2016, 09:47 AM) War is a racket. Go read that book. It was written by a high ranking US military official. Corps run the world. It's a fight for supremacy. It's a big club, only the big boys can join in. War makes the planet rotate. " Go read that book". I'll stop right here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 19 2016, 10:17 AM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 19 2016, 09:06 AM) Haha this ridiculous thing again.... At least don't call it a tank boat .A tank has very thick armor (that I am sure this boat does not have) to battle enemy tanks. This X-18 is basically a military bimaran boat with a heavy gun for (ship-to-shore?) fire support. Stop belittle our neighbour, at least they have their own industries. Unlike us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 19 2016, 10:24 AM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 19 2016, 10:21 AM) Cool down, brah. Criticizing a product is not the same as belittling a country. I criticize F-35 do I also belittle US military industry? Get your act together. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 26 2016, 07:48 AM
|
|
Spending trillions over Stealth Aircraft...................
.....................anti-stealth radar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 26 2016, 10:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 26 2016, 10:14 AM) Well, actually its relatively possible to detect stealth technology. Certain wavelength of radar waves, using different radar transmitter and receiver stations all can possibly detect stealth aircraft. You can also look for disturbances the aircraft causes in the atmosphere rather than looking for the aircraft itself. You can potentially use a Schlieren telescope to detect the movement of atmospheric disturbances as a stealth aircraft moves through the atmosphere. A photograph of a fighter jet's atmospheric disturbances taken from a Schlieren telescopeBasic radar computers and tech are also increasing in complexity and capability, so its entirely possible even basic modern radars can already detect older 1980's-level stealth technology. Yes. There even passive radar, X-Wave radar, and many more that can easily detect "stealth" fighter. Haha.. Trillions dollar down the drain..or maybe, just maybe, there are actually an actual true stealth aircraft that we dont know..maybe next 20 year only they reveal..huhu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 26 2016, 10:48 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Feb 26 2016, 10:45 AM) Stealthiness also depends on the plane's pitch, roll and yaw. In this position and with the weapon bay open, F-22 appears clearly on any radar system  If that position perpendicular to radar wave no need weapon bay also can detect haha..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 26 2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Feb 26 2016, 11:03 AM) RMAF aircraft crash lands along Kuala Selangor coastline [sos] Aduhhh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 26 2016, 11:36 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Feb 26 2016, 11:26 AM) it doesnt work that way... any weapon system there's surely a weakness... there's ultimate weapon... f-22s dont just go in alone blindly... any denial airspace would be taken out before these planes go in.. Go where liao? F-22 is for air superiority, not into deep enemy territory. Yes they are not go alone, thats why I said trillions dollar down to the drain. Might as well re-equipped/re-modernized current aircraft to fit to such missions. (They are actually doing it now) , but still, trillions down to the drain I'm talking about cost effectiveness here. Even American agreed. This post has been edited by Bombgen: Feb 26 2016, 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombgen
|
Feb 29 2016, 09:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Feb 29 2016, 07:37 AM) Australia Is Giving Up on Its Tiger Gunships, Which Have Never Seen Combat http://warisboring.com/articles/australia-...er-seen-combat/ Maybe we can buy this?
|
|
|
|
|