QUOTE(felixmask @ Mar 24 2016, 11:49 AM)
Yup still holding.. reasons belowArmada Clair is worth about 20% of total earnings. Based on 4+ 4 contract. This will affect the total revenue and profit and they might have to write down the asset value. This WILL hit the financial report badly in the next Q.
However Armada Clair started first oil in August 2014, so contract already run for 1.5 years, only 2.5 years remaining. Armada has filed request for $197 million compensation from Woodside as they have an ironclad contract. The fact Woodside has already provision for cancellation of contract in 2015 annual report for $128 million means they recognize they have no way out from the contract.
The why did Woodside cancle the FPSO? Because according to their calculation the loss from continue operating the Balvanes field with be much much higher than paying compensation to Armada. The Balvanes field (which is bought from Apache in 2015), initially shows good results, but the tapering of the oil production in 4Q 2105 shows that the 2P reserves (proven reserves) is much lower as initially estimated, so they decided to axe the field and shut it down.
Exact words (taken from Woodside 2015 annual report) :
QUOTE
“provision is made for the loss making component of non-cancellable operating leases. During the period, a US$128 million provision was recognised (in other provisions) for the remaining payment obligations under the Balnaves FPSO lease, which ends in 2018”.
In fact that Woodside already made provision, means they intend to settle and should not be in a court case, in the end the settlement might be worth between $128 - $197 million. The final figure will be recognized as 'other income' when the negotiation is done. The impact to Armada IF Woodside settle, with negate most if not ALL the earning loss.
This post has been edited by gark: Mar 24 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 24 2016, 12:03 PM

Quote
0.0331sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled