QUOTE(Hansel @ Sep 23 2017, 11:20 AM)
Okay,... tell me then,...what if I bought the following funds at the following prices and am still getting dividends today,... or wait,.. perhaps you guys are comparing me against the best funds out there,...
Surely, if yuo always compare me with the best performing funds out there,.. mine cannot win-lar,... you keep comparing me with that Pine fund,..
Bros, what,.. hang-on, I think dasecret is a young lady, sorry honey.... what I needed is cashflow,.. it's not accumulated capital gain over a longer period. So, it's not fair to compare me with the accumulation funds-mar,... isn't it ??
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Sep 23 2017, 12:01 PM)
Get your concept right first. All unit trust/mutual funds distribution/dividends are useless. You can search article written by govt link blogs to financial blogs all mentioned the same thing whether it's india, hong kong, malaysia, Singapore.
I give you few examples
Fund 1
A fund which give you 3% dividend every quarter without fail with returns of average 5%p.a over 3 years
Fund 2
A fund which give only 1% dividend once per year with returns of average 5%p.a over 3 years.
Fund 3
A fund which give only 1% dividend once per year with returns of average 7%p.a over 3 years.
Which would be the better choice?
She's an auntie who major in accounting.
Have to try to peace make here
I'm younger than Hansel so he call call me young lady, but I'm also much older than fresh grad, so that's why I'm auntie to him
You see, this statement essentially means the same thing as the argument here. It's the perspective.
Ramjade; and myself in the past, try to explain to Hansel that just because the fund gives distribution and the NAV holds doesn't mean it's the best fund available on FSM. The assessment is a lot more accurate and objective if one looks at returns instead of distribution + NAV value doesn't go to red.
Hansel on the other hand feels that regular distribution is what he wants and perhaps, because he's quite rich, he doesn't really want to spend time researching for the best funds currently. Since this is the segment that made him money he would like to just continue with it. Your money your call
Food for thought, while it's convenient to have regular distribution done by the fund, but if the total returns for a fund without distribution is much higher than the one with distribution, it may be worthwhile to "DIY" the distribution by selling some units on a regular basis. It's effectively the same thing.
Another food for thought, the strategy that worked for the past 5 years may not work for the next 5 years. Example, Kodak filed for bankruptcy because they couldn't evolve with time while Fujifilm continue to do well because of the instax polaroid type product. So sometimes we do need to move ships so we don't sink slowly