Guys, can you suggest a LCD monitor that have VGA input to play PS2? Plan to have the 22" one.

Thanks.

UltraSharpTM 2208WFP vs 228WFP

Only differences are the usb ports and the adjustability of the monitor? Or quality of display, ultrasharp is better?

In my opinion, they should name it "UltraStand" if the different is only with the support stand instead of better panel or display.

Guys, hope I can get some help here... I'm thinking of buying an LCD that can display 1080p, as long as it doesnt need to downsize to fit the screen. I dont want a full HD cuz its gonna cost me a bomb, just want something that can display 1080p full screen nicely. Whats the cheapest price range I can get 1 of these? Looking for either Sony or Samsung only. The sole purpose for it is to play PS3 only, nothing else

U need to state ur budget first, if not there will be crazy recommendation from RM 10K and above ~!

I assume that Ur budget will be quite low, I suggest a Sony KLV-32V400A/B for rm3K or Sony KLV-32S400A for rm2.5K

Source http://www.sonystyle.com.my/product/produc...ubcategoryid=37

It accept 1080P signal which means U can play ps3 at 1080P.

This post has been edited by waif: Jun 19 2008, 04:48 PM

i tink the difference is the resolution..

ultrasharp has higher reso compared to 228WFP

correct me if im wrong..

---

Added on June 19, 2008, 6:05 pmoops.. jus found out..

both have same reso..

difference is only the adjustability and ports..

btw.. both are TN panels as well

This post has been edited by dantwt: Jun 19 2008, 06:05 PM

Thats why I said it should be named "UltraStand" instead.

my bro going to get a sharp 32" lcd for my parents ...
since he is the one going to pay the money..,,
i wonder sharp lcd good ? rm1799 ,
and i say why don't get samsung one he says rm1999 abit expensive ..
is that huge different between this 2 lcd beside the design?

haha. in your first reply, with the smiley at the end, it could mean 2 things.
1 - you being sarcastic.
2 - you really meant it.

get LG 1952TQ (2ms), its spec and looks is better than W1942T which is an old model and had been replace by 1952TQ.

sharp afaik had the best image quality of its time...i'm not sure about the others...

1952tq has a very ugly bezel tho

Then go for Samsung 931BW lo.
1952TQ is far better than LG 1942T.

ain it has the difference of having the better color quality? the 2208 has the wad wad 92% color gamut wad shit, no?

Isit? Oh, I don't know about this. If so, my apology to Dell. hehe...
But, for me this "UltraSharp" name most used for LCD with better panel type in the past.

I'm saving for this and it is almost here : D



CNET’s done the first review of this 27 incher that will first appear in Australia for $1200 AU ( thats about $1150 US). With resolution 1920 x 1200, fonts on our OS should be quite clearer and easier to see compared to say a 24 incher.

The 2709WFP has for input two DVI ports, DisplayPort, HDMI and three 3.5mm audio jacks which passthrough HDMI. The 2709WFP has touch sensitive buttons, five of them to be exactly appearing when we need (touch) them.

Cnet Review here

Since there are so many people goin for TV instead of monitor why don't we go for TV instead of monitor LCD I mean. LCD TV is so much bigger with not much price difference to the 24".

while bigger, lcd tv do not sport higher resolution(averagely is 1366x768, and 1920x1080 in full hd). In comparison to a typical 24" monitor which will give you 1920x1200 pixels or a 30" with 2560x1600pixels.

Currently i m looking Samsung LCD 22" T220 & LG L227WT this 2 model of the LCD. May i know where can i get it in Malaysia?

it only enlarges the size of the fonts because the size of each pixel gets bigger,doesn't make it any clearer...although it is easier to read for people who have difficulty with the small pixel size on 24"

because as kc pointed out the resolution on TV's are horrible, try using a tv as a monitor, the fonts have to be really big or they will be very blurry,especially on lower resolution TVs
and TVs with high resolutions are very expensive compared to their monitor counterparts

This post has been edited by Kytz: Jun 20 2008, 04:27 PM

I see.... ahh. well above 22" is still a big gap in price for monitors I guess its not worth to get 24" yet.
Thanks for the info guys.