QUOTE(lucerne @ Jun 20 2016, 12:10 PM)
agreed the committee not more than 3 consecutive years. some condo has been abused by the committee and always think the condo is belong to their father or kingdom.
the committee also control the management office and always get them elected by collecting (illegally?) the proxy forms to support themself
what can we do if the committee still elect themself after 3 years? i asked COB and they cant give me the answer...
the committee also bring their own legal adviser (paid by the residents) during the AGM and always back their arguments. residents has no says when the lawyer said it is ok. they argued that the act is only effective after June 2015 so they can still be elected for another 2 terms.
it is similar to a president who already served many years made announcement that a president not allowed to serve office for more than 2 terms/years and he can still be elected for another 2 terms/years??
anyone has valid support documents to counter this?? eg cob, ministry, lawyer etc?
This argument actually has some ground.the committee also control the management office and always get them elected by collecting (illegally?) the proxy forms to support themself
what can we do if the committee still elect themself after 3 years? i asked COB and they cant give me the answer...
the committee also bring their own legal adviser (paid by the residents) during the AGM and always back their arguments. residents has no says when the lawyer said it is ok. they argued that the act is only effective after June 2015 so they can still be elected for another 2 terms.
it is similar to a president who already served many years made announcement that a president not allowed to serve office for more than 2 terms/years and he can still be elected for another 2 terms/years??
anyone has valid support documents to counter this?? eg cob, ministry, lawyer etc?
The newly enacted rules or strata act on not more than 3 terms only can be effected after it is gazetted which is last year or so, so whatever previously happened before the law exist doesn't count.
When 2014 has no such a strata title act, how can the issue of 2014 (being appointed as committee) being brought up on 2016 saying it violates the strata act that started 2015?
It doesn't make sense.
Jun 20 2016, 05:00 PM
Quote
0.0293sec
0.39
6 queries
GZIP Disabled