QUOTE(OvenBaked @ May 27 2015, 03:28 PM)
than got answer? maybe he or deputy replay “we current focus current treat,no need high tech weapon like bought by other asean country...”
Military Thread V17
|
|
May 27 2015, 03:51 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 03:53 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
delete ........
This post has been edited by waja2000: May 27 2015, 04:06 PM |
|
|
May 27 2015, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
91 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 04:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا |
Report In
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 04:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ May 27 2015, 03:51 PM) than got answer? To be fair, it seems now Malaysia has a lot more low-level threats to deal with than possible conventional warfare. Cross-border kidnappings, returning Malaysian IS jihadists, Southern Philippine militants, uncontrolled illegal immigrants entry and maritime territory disputes (arguable as some issues do involve intervention by RMN, some issues are law-enforment issues handled by APMM).maybe he or deputy replay “we current focus current treat,no need high tech weapon like bought by other asean country...” With these mounting issues and limited budget, I'm pretty sure there are some merits for putting extra effort to solve these problems. |
|
|
May 27 2015, 04:57 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Looks like whatever sph that will be chosen in the future for atm it will be tracked version
Just hearsay from industry players |
|
|
May 27 2015, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
922 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: Alor Setar, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 05:27 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 09:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ May 27 2015, 11:03 AM) Later buy type10 mbt. maritime boss especially coast guard Japan, Malaysia agree to begin defence industry collaboration Japan and Malaysia have agreed to co-operate on defence trade and related technologies as a reflection of deepening bilateral ties, a joint statement said on 25 May. Following meetings in Tokyo between Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his visiting counterpart, Najib Razak, a statement said the two countries would "initiate negotiations on the framework for co-operation on the transfer of defence equipment and technology". The statement said the move to collaborate in defence trade is part of a commitment by the two countries to raise their bilateral ties to a "strategic partnership". The elevation in ties will also facilitate closer maritime security links, co-operation in Malaysia's infrastructure development programme, and collaboration in training and education. sosej most also MPA K2 QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 27 2015, 04:57 PM) Looks like whatever sph that will be chosen in the future for atm it will be tracked version apa lagi K9 lah... bundle with K2 also goodJust hearsay from industry players |
|
|
May 27 2015, 10:14 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
28 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 11:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(hafizushi @ May 27 2015, 10:14 PM) i support k9 for malaysia, pzh 2000 is too heavy and i dont trust china made weapon unless it something like manpad plus track-armor is good at least can survive small grenade to be honest, i rather take pzh2000 to K9. because it most likely be cheaper or as cheap as those from korea as we will be using those overhauled instead of brand new Plus, it german made, pzh2000 fire faster and more shell storage or better This post has been edited by thpace: May 27 2015, 11:31 PM |
|
|
May 27 2015, 11:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
Chinese Coast Guard heavy patrol vessel CCG 2901 takes to the ocean on sea trials
![]() The CCG 2901 departs for sea trials on the East China sea China's (and possibly the world's) largest coast guard patrol vessel, CCG 2901 has left port on 21 May for sea trials in the East China Sea. The heavy patrol vessel, estimated to weigh 12,000 tons with a hull length of 161 meters and a beam of 22 meters is an obvious sign of the level of seriousness the Chinese government is indulging to protect seas that is sees as its territorial waters. The patrol vessel is thought to be capable of long-range transoceanic patrols, but is expected to be deployed mainly to the East China sea region, where China has significant maritime territorial disputes with Japan and Taiwan, centered on the ownership of the Senkaku Island chain (Diaoyu Islands in Chinese) and its surrounding waters. The CCG 2901 is armed with a 76mm gun, two 30mm autocannons and a number of smaller machine guns. It is also capable to deploy and house up to two Z-8 heavy transport helicopters for various rescue and law-enforcement duties. A number of smaller boats carried onboard also enable it to send out boarding parties or anti-piracy teams. The CCG 2901's sister vessel of the same class, the CCG 2501 is still under construction and is expected to come into service sometime in 2016. |
|
|
May 27 2015, 11:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ May 27 2015, 11:33 PM) Chinese Coast Guard heavy patrol vessel CCG 2901 takes to the ocean on sea trials more like warship already ![]() The CCG 2901 departs for sea trials on the East China sea China's (and possibly the world's) largest coast guard patrol vessel, CCG 2901 has left port on 21 May for sea trials in the East China Sea. The heavy patrol vessel, estimated to weigh 12,000 tons with a hull length of 161 meters and a beam of 22 meters is an obvious sign of the level of seriousness the Chinese government is indulging to protect seas that is sees as its territorial waters. The patrol vessel is thought to be capable of long-range transoceanic patrols, but is expected to be deployed mainly to the East China sea region, where China has significant maritime territorial disputes with Japan and Taiwan, centered on the ownership of the Senkaku Island chain (Diaoyu Islands in Chinese) and its surrounding waters. The CCG 2901 is armed with a 76mm gun, two 30mm autocannons and a number of smaller machine guns. It is also capable to deploy and house up to two Z-8 heavy transport helicopters for various rescue and law-enforcement duties. A number of smaller boats carried onboard also enable it to send out boarding parties or anti-piracy teams. The CCG 2901's sister vessel of the same class, the CCG 2501 is still under construction and is expected to come into service sometime in 2016. |
|
|
May 27 2015, 11:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
there news in Russian, that russia have cancelled the mistral deal
Ship lelong lelong.. siapa nak beli LTZ suruh rmn propose beli |
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:13 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
36 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(LTZ @ May 28 2015, 12:13 AM) lupakan dulu le kot bab2 ni....mcm takde ape2 perkembangan dah skarng ni. Jiran 3 step forwards kita 1 step back. While I'm all for constant improvement for the armed forces, I don't like Malaysia getting into arms races for the hell of it. Too many countries ruined themselves putting military priorities first.If a neighbor buys something, doesn't mean you have to buy something too. |
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ May 28 2015, 12:26 AM) While I'm all for constant improvement for the armed forces, I don't like Malaysia getting into arms races for the hell of it. Too many countries ruined themselves putting military priorities first. it operational requirementIf a neighbor buys something, doesn't mean you have to buy something too. not just for the sake of having it what arm race in asean? it just that a common enenmy have appear while others take steps to counter it. we pulak like ltz say move backward |
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ May 28 2015, 12:26 AM) While I'm all for constant improvement for the armed forces, I don't like Malaysia getting into arms races for the hell of it. Too many countries ruined themselves putting military priorities first. apa lah Mindef iniIf a neighbor buys something, doesn't mean you have to buy something too. bos bos lu tak marah? satu benda pun macam tak ada. Not 1 or 2 years. For the next 5 years |
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(thpace @ May 28 2015, 12:50 AM) apa lah Mindef ini No big ticket buys doesn't mean no buys at all. Not as if suddenly Malaysia declare 0% military budget for the next 5 years.bos bos lu tak marah? satu benda pun macam tak ada. Not 1 or 2 years. For the next 5 years Also no offense, but I seriously think if PRC is serious in taking the SCS by force and US by some reason decides not to intervene, i 'd say the whole of ASEAN can't do jack to repel them. |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0301sec
0.31
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:00 AM |