Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 89 90 91 92 93 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V17

views
     
SUSAxeFire
post Aug 18 2015, 10:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
From: Penang
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Aug 18 2015, 07:36 PM)
China is in the process of updating its fleet of long-range heavy bombers and its newest H-6K should make the United States nervous, military expert David Axe argues.

user posted image
http://sputniknews.com/military/20150816/1025808389.html
*
if its not stealth its a

big flying target

This post has been edited by AxeFire: Aug 18 2015, 10:55 PM
ayanami_tard
post Aug 18 2015, 11:32 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 18 2015, 11:12 PM)
hmm.gif  hope they dont go backwards to conventional design like msia
*
hurr just because mag on front= backward

even pla replace their advanced qbz97 with backward qbz 03, and the french is looking for backward design for FAMAS
SUSalaskanbunny
post Aug 18 2015, 11:53 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Aug 18 2015, 11:32 PM)
hurr just because mag on front= backward

even pla replace their advanced qbz97 with backward qbz 03, and the french is looking for backward design for FAMAS
*
bullpup design is determined by mag location? doh.gif

who say pla replace (qbz97 is export version) qbz95 with qbz03... 03 is not even a standard rifle with limited adoption

waaa... you work for french mindef ar?

user posted image
ayanami_tard
post Aug 19 2015, 02:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 19 2015, 12:53 AM)
bullpup design is determined by mag location?  doh.gif

who say pla replace (qbz97 is export version) qbz95 with qbz03... 03 is not even a standard rifle with limited adoption

waaa... you work for french mindef ar?

*
bullpup rifle has their magazine placed at the buttstock, and yes the french is looking for Famas replacements
ZeneticX
post Aug 19 2015, 07:19 AM

stars for what
********
All Stars
12,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: KL - Cardiff - Subang - Sydney



QUOTE
MRCA: Fulcrum and Retirement

SHAH ALAM: IN my post about the RMK11, I mentioned the political considerations as one of the reasons for the retirement of RMAF Mig-29 Fulcrum fleet. Without approved funding in RMK11, the Fulcrum will simply grind out of service without any fanfare.

However as I had reported (the post is missing) during the 57th anniversary Press conference at the Kuantan air base on June 1 this year, RMAF chief Jen Tan Sri Roslan Saad refused to confirm nor deny the retirement date.

The reticence about Fulcrum exact retirement date was puzzling to say the least as the previous RMAF chief had unequivocally stated that the aircraft will be retired by the end of 2015.

The issue became more confusing when the New Straits Times the next day reported ( although the reporter stated that his story never said it) that the Government had agreed to fund the Fulcrum upgrade!

For the record the latest version of the story, available online, still contained a quote by Roslan that the Fulcrums will be upgraded. It is less sensational than the original story published on June 2, however. (My video recording of the whole Press conference clearly showed that Roslan never said such a thing).

As it was an NST report, a couple of aviation portals and even a magazine had subsequently reported that RMAF will upgrade the Fulcrums, claiming it will follow the upgrade path as proposed by Airod’s subsidiary, ATSC Sdn Bhd at LIMA 2015.

user posted image
A model at ATSC stand featuring the proposed Fuclrum modernisation. Among others it will be fitted with the Flanker’s avionics.

This is the Aviation Week report on the proposal:

“The aircraft proposed by Airod’s Aerospace Technology Systems Corporation, in conjunction with Malaysia’s Sukhoi Technical Centre, would receive a new high-resolution, fire-control radar; improved cockpit ergonomics; and better avionics, while the type’s airframe life would be extended to 6,000h from the current 4,000h.”

To read the full story go here.

I did not report about the proposal as I was told bluntly by several officials at the air show that a political decision had been made on the Fulcrum. No more funding period. And then came the NST on June 2!

Well anyhow, I find out recently why the retirement of the Fulcrum is a sensitive one. Apparently, Russia is putting pressure on Malaysia to cancel the retirement plan. Instead of retiring the fighters, Russia offered to upgrade “all” surviving aircraft to the same standard as the Indian Air Force Mig-29 upgrade, the same one proposed by Airod.

The IAF Fulcrum UPG among others include the the new Zhuk-M2E radar made by Phazotron-NIIR, the OLS-UEM infrared search-and-track system (IRST) similar to the Indian Navy MiG-29Ks, thermal / TV / laser imaging made by Moscow-based NPK SPP, multi-functional full-colour LCDs in the cockpit, increased fuel capacity and more powerful RD-33 series 3 turbo-jet engines.

According to reports, the new radar range has increase to 200 nautical miles and the ability to track 60 targets simultaneously and adds terrain-following mode and ground-target acquisition.

However, there is a catch to the Russian proposal. Until we come up with the actual number of aircraft to be upgraded, the Russians cannot give an exact cost of the project. It will be cheaper than buying a new batch of MRCA of course.

Why pressure Malaysia to continue flying the Fuclrums then?. Apart from pride, the Russian apparently are miffed that Malaysia wants to retire its pride and joy halfway through its expected service life.

With MIG design bureau continue to bleed money while at the same time Rosoboronexport, the state owned arms export agency continuing to market the Fulcrum, it is imperative that they ensure one of its main users continue flying the aircraft as long as possible.

So are we going to upgrade the Fulcrum after all especially with our funding difficulties? I was told, Nyet!.

— Malaysian Defence
http://www.malaysiandefence.com/?p=2787
MilitaryMadness
post Aug 19 2015, 10:32 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(AxeFire @ Aug 18 2015, 10:55 PM)
if its not stealth its a

big flying target
*
For a cruise missile carrier the H-6K is supposed to be, stealth or not don't really matter. The missiles it carries itself can already go thousands of miles on its own, far beyond the range of any interceptor or AA systems that can shoot down the bomber. Bomber only needs to get missile into max range, find target, fire missile and go home.

Nobody really uses heavy bomber planes for direct bombing anymore. Everyone who has them uses them as missile carriers, unless there is 99.9% confirmed chance the enemy has absolutely no anti-air capabilities, like when the US used the B-52 as a bomb truck in Afghanistan. But I guess that's an exception rather than the rule.
haji_george
post Aug 19 2015, 10:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Northern Region



aku ni slow ke?
CARAT skang di Sandakan eh...

info dari FB
U.S. Pacific Fleet
SUSAxeFire
post Aug 19 2015, 12:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
From: Penang
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Aug 19 2015, 10:32 AM)
For a cruise missile carrier the H-6K is supposed to be, stealth or not don't really matter. The missiles it carries itself can already go thousands of miles on its own, far beyond the range of any interceptor or AA systems that can shoot down the bomber. Bomber only needs to get missile into max range, find target, fire missile and go home.

Nobody really uses heavy bomber planes for direct bombing anymore. Everyone who has them uses them as missile carriers, unless there is 99.9% confirmed chance the enemy has absolutely no anti-air capabilities, like when the US used the B-52 as a bomb truck in Afghanistan. But I guess that's an exception rather than the rule.
*
That means we need advanced anti missile anti air defences
mi-g
post Aug 19 2015, 12:14 PM

Part-time Troll
******
Senior Member
1,501 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: ISA Detention Room -Port Valdez-



QUOTE(haji_george @ Aug 19 2015, 10:54 AM)
aku ni slow ke?
CARAT skang di Sandakan eh...

info dari FB
U.S. Pacific Fleet
*
page belakang siap ade gmbr lg bro
SUSalaskanbunny
post Aug 19 2015, 12:44 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Aug 19 2015, 02:30 AM)
bullpup rifle has their magazine placed at the buttstock, and yes the french is looking for Famas replacements
*
mag at the back is a result of the design and not the purpose of the design...

replace gun not switching from bull to conventional
MilitaryMadness
post Aug 19 2015, 02:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(AxeFire @ Aug 19 2015, 12:01 PM)
That means we need advanced anti missile anti air defences
*
The problem is shooting down missiles need more high-tech solutions than shooting down airplanes. Compared to shooting down missiles, shooting down airplanes is peanuts.

Cruise missile hard to target because most are ground-hugging and can hide among the terrain, while ICBM even harder because of the extreme terminal velocity of the warheads (usually mach 5+)and the possibility of decoys.

Even the the premier SAM missile system, the Patriot doesn't look that impressive since its major claim to fame are shooting down Scud missiles that were made with 1950s technology.
BorneoAlliance
post Aug 19 2015, 05:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

PLA Navy commissions second Type 052D guided missile destroyer

user posted image

Changsha, the Chinese navy's second Type 052D guided missile destroyer, officially enters service with the PLA's South Sea Fleet on Aug. 17 according to the People's Navy, a newspaper operated by the Chinese military, on Aug. 17.

The commissioning of the Changsha took place at an unknown harbor in Sanya in south China's island province of Hainan, the fleet's base. The destroyer, numbered 173, was launched in December 2013 and is designed to improve the South Seas Fleet's air defense and anti-ship capabilities. The PLA currently has eight warships equipped with active electronic scanning array radar, referred to as the "Chinese Aegis."

Only two such destroyers, Kunming and Changsha, are Type 052D; the other six are all Type 052C guided missile destroyers.

The Type 052D is the improved version of the Type 052C and is estimated to have similar capabilities to the Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyer of the US Navy. In addition to deploying the HQ-9 air defense missile, the destroyer can be fitted with anti-ship missiles such as the YJ-18 and YJ-62. The 730 close-in weapon system located at the rear of the Type 052C was replaced by HHQ-10 air defense missiles aboard the Type 052D.

The HHQ-9 air defense missile allows the Type 052D to intercept ballistic missiles within 2,000 kilometers. It is not only designed to combat enemy warships and aircraft, but also to defend Chinese territory, the report said.

The PLA Navy plans to build 10 Type 052D destroyers.

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...=20150819000023
BorneoAlliance
post Aug 19 2015, 05:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

A mountain brigade of the Russian Central Military District has been equipped with a modernized version of the Tigr (Tiger) multipurpose all-terrain infantry mobility vehicles.

user posted image

QUOTE
The modernized Tigr features a new diesel engine, a new armored hood, an air filter installation, an increase in the number of rear passenger seats (from eight to nine) and the replacement of the bicuspid rear hatch with a large square hatch.

"In addition, the vehicle is equipped with  automatically regulated tire pressure, an automatic fire suppression system, a starting preheater and a self-recovery winch," the press service said.

Main armament includes the 7.62mm Pecheneg and 12.7mm Cord machine guns, as well the 30mm Plamya (Flame) automatic mounted grenade launcher.


http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150818/102...ssian-army.html
azriel
post Aug 19 2015, 07:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Two more CN-235 MPA for the Indonesian Navy & another two for the Indonesian Air Force. Interesting that these MPAs will be fitted with a 20mm gun. So it will be kinda a MPA/gunship.

user posted image

QUOTE
Dirgantara to launch two maritime patrol aircraft

thejakartapost.com, Jakarta | August 19 2015 | 4:47 PM

State-owned aircraft manufacturer PT Dirgantara Indonesia (DI) is set to launch two maritime patrol aircraft for the Indonesian Navy (TNI AL) by the end of the year.

DI president director Budi Santoso said there are currently three maritime patrol aircraft produced by DI and operated by TNI AL.

“We will add two more maritime patrol units by the end of the year,” said Budi as reported by kontan.co.id.

Budi confirmed that in February or March of next year, DI will also supply two maritime patrol aircraft for the Air Force (TNI AU). He said that each unit takes approximately 18 to 24 months to produce, depending on the type.

The maritime patrol aircraft is a modification of CN 235, the aircraft most frequently manufactured by the DI. The main modification to the maritime version is the inclusion of a large gun using 20 millimeter caliber bullets.

Price-wise, the maritime patrol aircraft is more expensive than the CN 235, which is sold for US$22 to 23 million.

“But the selling price for the three aircraft purchased by TNI AL is confidential,” said DI head of public relations Irland Budiman.

The aircraft will be used by the government to guard and monitor Indonesia's maritime resources, as illegal fishing operations continue to deplete the nation's fisheries. (nov/kes)(++++)


http://m.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/08/1...l-aircraft.html

This post has been edited by azriel: Aug 19 2015, 09:07 PM
DDG_Ross
post Aug 19 2015, 09:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean


QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 18 2015, 10:12 PM)
hmm.gif  hope they dont go backwards to conventional design like msia
*
why not? and they did

LMT AR-15
user posted image

QUOTE
Army’s Rifle Choice Positive Sign for Defence Procurement
Wednesday, 19 August 2015, 2:12 pm
Press Release: New Zealand First Party

Ron Mark MP

Spokesperson for Defence

Spokesperson for Veterans Affairs
19 AUGUST 2015

Army’s Rifle Choice Positive Sign for Defence Procurement

New Zealand First is pleased to see the Ministry of Defence has selected LMT’s AR15 as the preferred weapon to replace the Steyr rifle in service with the army, navy and airforce.

“Our men and women will at last have access to a widely used battle-proven rifle,” says New Zealand First Defence Spokesperson Ron Mark.

“LMT-made rifles have a fantastic reputation for quality and reliability. The reports I have received confirm our view that it will become the best individual weapon system since the L1A1 SLR.

“The AR15 is the sort of battle proven weapon, which is capable of firing thousands of rounds without cleaning or stoppage. It reflects a new generation of rifles and we will benefit from ready access to support, development and configuration options.

“This is a positive choice as preferred rifle and preferred tenderer and a positive sign the Ministry of Defence is starting to get aspects of procurement right,” says Mr Mark.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1508/S003...procurement.htm


This post has been edited by DDG_Ross: Aug 19 2015, 09:38 PM
SUSalaskanbunny
post Aug 19 2015, 10:37 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Aug 19 2015, 09:37 PM)
why not? and they did

LMT AR-15
user posted image
*
sad... 2nd country after msia..
waja2000
post Aug 19 2015, 11:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 19 2015, 10:37 PM)
sad... 2nd country after msia..
*
LMT-AR15 no good ?

This post has been edited by waja2000: Aug 20 2015, 01:24 AM
SUSalaskanbunny
post Aug 19 2015, 11:37 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(waja2000 @ Aug 19 2015, 11:31 PM)
LMT-15 no good ?
*
dont know... probably suit the kiwis better than a bullpup considering most of their terrain are open than urban
DDG_Ross
post Aug 20 2015, 12:05 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean


QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Aug 19 2015, 10:37 PM)
sad... 2nd country after msia..
*
why sad? every weapons platform have its pros and cons, and ar is cheaper
lmt selection is kinda a no-brainer as their 7.62mm marksmen rifle is from lmt too
SUSalaskanbunny
post Aug 20 2015, 12:07 AM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Aug 20 2015, 12:05 AM)
why sad? every weapons platform have its pros and cons, and ar is cheaper
lmt selection is kinda a no-brainer as their 7.62mm marksmen rifle is from lmt too
*
sad as in being 1 step backwards... ar cheaper? you sure?

hmm.. so their standard rifle would be a mbr instead of assault?

This post has been edited by alaskanbunny: Aug 20 2015, 12:08 AM

123 Pages « < 89 90 91 92 93 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0356sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 07:55 AM