QUOTE(LaVilla @ Jul 4 2015, 03:48 AM)
mt kk earthquack
Military Thread V17
Military Thread V17
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 07:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 10:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
budak baru keluar sekolah... proud of them |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 06:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jul 7 2015, 05:36 PM) read new many fresh grade from Uni un-employed ... maybe GOV can more attract more from them join army RMAF/RMN/RMA。。。 more and more high-tech weapon and sensor/system like new Gowind ship need more skill crew too... |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jul 7 2015, 06:48 PM) Mindef didn't promote extensively to the graduates the opportunities and benefits in joining the military join as enlisted la... they should also create a new scheme for diploma graduates too so that students like me can join..I don't have the passion to further degree after this..lulz.. iinm, right now they only have scheme for degree graduates.. and lastly, would it kill the gov to increase the basic salary for the military just a little bit more..asyik penjawat awam in other sector je yang dapat kenaikan beratus2.. QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jul 7 2015, 07:00 PM) does that mean frontline already got theirs? |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 08:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
Philippines ramps up military spending in face of China threat
MANILA: The Philippines plans to ramp up military spending over the next 13 years, earmarking more than US$20 billion to modernise its forces in the face of Beijing's maritime ambitions in the disputed South China Sea, a top air force official told Reuters. Major-General Raul del Rosario, military chief of plans, said the blueprint includes installing radars and sensors, and buying equipment such as submarines, frigates, fighters, surveillance planes and missile systems. "By the time, we complete this plan, we will have complete coverage of the South China Sea," said del Rosario, a former fighter pilot, showing the military's detailed plan that was approved on Friday. "We will have 24/7 awareness of what is happening in the disputed area and we'll be able to respond quicker to any contingency in our own exclusive economic zone." He said the ambitious plan was initiated in 2013, but top brass had only approved overall spending of 998 billion pesos (US$22.11 billion) last week. Del Rosario said 83 billion pesos had been earmarked for the first five years, 444 billion pesos for the second five years and 471 billion pesos for the last five years. In 1995, Congress had earmarked 364 billion pesos for a similar 15-year plan. Less than one-tenth of that sum was actually spent by 2010. The modernisation programme is designed to strengthen Manila's claims in the South China Sea, believed to be rich in energy deposits. China has become increasingly assertive in the South China Sea, building artificial islands in areas over which the Philippines and other countries have rival claims. The moves have sparked alarm regionally and in Washington. SUBMARINES, MISSILES AND SURVEILLANCE PLANES President Benigno Aquino has promised the military about 34 billion pesos this year, which will fund the purchase of two frigates and a twin-engine long range maritime aircraft. So far, the government has given the military 9.4 billion pesos in 2014. This has been used to purchase eight combat utility helicopters and as a downpayment for 12 FA50 fighter-trainers from South Korea. Two of the aircraft are expected in 2016. Del Rosario said that between 2018 and 2023 the Philippines would buy electric-diesel submarines and advanced missile systems. Three aerial surveillance radars with a range of 350 nautical miles will also be installed in Ilocos Norte, Lubang island and Mount Salacot in Palawan, all facing the South China Sea to detect movements in the disputed area. These will complement the navy's two surface sensors capable of detecting ship activities 200 miles away. Three surveillance planes will also be on constant patrol in the area. "We do not aim to defeat China," del Rosario said. "But our goal is make any state think twice before attacking. We will make sure anybody attacking us would end up with a bloodied nose." (US$1 = 45.1300 Philippine pesos) (Reporting By Manuel Mogato; Editing by Jeremy Laurence) - Reuters |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 09:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 11:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
msia ada tak? |
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 06:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 07:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
The Peacekeeper Protected Response Vehicle is the 2nd People's Defence Force Command's newest asset. With its enhanced weapons system, increased mobility, and better protection, the Peacekeeper is well-equipped to safeguard our homeland. Check out this video to find out more about the Peacekeeper! |
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 10:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 12:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 08:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 09:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 09:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
Japan is interested in joining a NATO missile building consortium that would give Tokyo its first taste of a multinational defence project, sources said.
![]() TOKYO: Japan is interested in joining a NATO missile building consortium that would give Tokyo its first taste of a multinational defence project, a move the US Navy is encouraging because it could pave the way for Japan to lead similar partnerships in Asia, sources said. The 12-country NATO consortium oversees development and shares the costs of the SeaSparrow missile, an advanced ship-borne weapon designed to destroy anti-ship sea-skimming missiles and attack aircraft. The missile is made by U.S. weapons firms Raytheon and General Dynamics . In May, Japanese naval officers travelled to a North Atlantic Treaty Organization meeting in The Hague to learn more about the consortium, Japan's navy and a U.S. source familiar with the trip told Reuters. Two Japanese sources familiar with the initiative said discussions in Tokyo were at an early stage, although joining the consortium would dovetail with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's more muscular security agenda, which included the lifting last year of a decades-old ban on arms exports. The sources declined to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The consortium, established in 1968 by four countries including the United States, is set to develop an upgraded version of the SeaSparrow in the coming years. Having Japan on board would spread the project's costs, but Washington also sees a role for Japan in leading multinational military industrial partnerships in Asia at a time when China's military modernisation and assertiveness is alarming many countries in the region, said the U.S. source. Such partnerships, which are rare in Asia, would create a network of security ties beyond formal military alliances that mostly involve Washington and its various regional allies. "We think this project will allow Japan to lay the groundwork for further defence export programmes in the future," the U.S. source said. "We would welcome this kind of security cooperation activity by Japan in the region." Asked to comment, a spokesman for the Japanese navy said in an email: "The U.S. Navy is keeping us informed about the SeaSparrow project. With the aim of improving the procurement efficiency of our ship-based surface to air missiles we are gathering information to make the necessary choice." The U.S. Navy said it was not immediately able to comment. NATO declined to comment. TOKYO ALREADY BEEFING UP ASIA TIES Japan has one of the most advanced military industrial bases in the world, but companies such as Mitsubishi Heavy Industries have long made weapons only for the Self Defense Forces because of the arms export ban. Since lifting those curbs, Abe has begun boosting security cooperation across Southeast Asia, where several countries with tight budgets are worried by China's creation of man-made islands in the disputed South China Sea. In June, Abe agreed with Philippine President Benigno Aquino on an exchange of military technology and hardware. Abe in May also agreed to start talks on transfers of defence equipment and technology with Malaysia. And Australia is considering Japan as the possible builder of its next generation submarines, something U.S. naval commanders have publicly encouraged because doing so would deepen ties between two of Washington's closest allies in Asia. None of these initiatives, however, are multinational. SOME CONCERNS IN TOKYO Japan's navy already uses the SeaSparrow missile, which is assembled locally by Mitsubishi Electric under a co-production agreement with NATO and the U.S. manufacturers. That would make the transition to a full consortium partner easier, said the U.S. source. One of the Japanese sources said some concerns had been raised in Tokyo over diminished control over production by being a member, even though sharing of costs would be welcomed. "The concern is what it would mean to security by having to rely on other nations," the Japanese source said, referring to the possibility supplies of munitions and equipment from other countries could be disrupted more easily than those made at home, especially during any conflict. It could also become a political issue since Japanese firms that supply parts for the SeaSparrow missiles made in Japan could miss out if Tokyo joined a consortium where work was spread among participating nations. The U.S. Navy's desire to see Japan in the consortium comes after a proposal for Mitsubishi Heavy to join Lockheed Martin Corp's F-35 stealth fighter programme fizzled out last year. Japanese defence bureaucrats had hoped working on the F-35 as a subcontractor to rear fuselage maker BAE Systems of Britain would have given Mitsubishi Heavy exposure to global arms markets. But it proved impossible for Mitsubishi Heavy to compete on pricing of components given the advantage enjoyed by contractors in the initial nine countries due to their governments' funding of specialised tooling for the programme. "Japan recognises that it should join these international groups to help amortise purchases and make their industry more competitive," said a U.S. executive who works closely with the Japanese government and industry. "You're going to see them engaged in more and more bilateral, trilateral and multilateral groups in coming years." - Reuters |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
QUOTE(learn2earn8 @ Jul 10 2015, 11:57 AM) hahahhaha obama want to project power, did u hear of his latest cuts on manpower might not be a bad thing for us, defense does not come in the form of just military.. http://freebeacon.com/national-security/en...tary-dominance/ President Barack Obama will sharply cut ships, aircraft, and troops as part of a major reduction of U.S. military forces that will face even steeper downsizing in 2016 would reduce U.S. ground forces to their lowest level since World War II at a time when world threats are increasing The military cutbacks have been a central feature of Obama’s policies since 2009. According to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in his recently published book Duty, since entering office, the president has worked to cut U.S. defenses in order to use the funds for domestic programs “we are entering an era where American dominance on the seas, in the skies, and in space can no longer be taken for granted,” the cuts also would reduce the ability of U.S. military forces to conduct more than one major military conflict in the world at the same time, something that could potentially trigger an outbreak of global conflict. However, managing the risks will be more difficult after 2016, when further deep cuts are scheduled to take effect. The Air Force will reduce the number of tactical air squadrons, including the elimination of the tank-busting, close-air support A-10 jet. All U-2 reconnaissance aircraft will be retired in favor of the unmanned Global Hawk drone, and armed Predator unmanned drones will be cut from a planned force of 65 non-stop air patrols to a planned force of 55 combat patrols. The more advanced Reaper drone will be purchased and eventually replace the Predator. However, should sequestration resume at projected levels in 2016, the Air Force will cut 80 additional aircraft, including the entire KC-10 aerial refueling tanker fleet, additional Global Hawks and scale back purchases of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a jet plagued with cost overruns. Predator and Reaper purchases also will decline after 2016. Special operations commando forces will increase from 66,000 to 69,700 For the Navy, 11 aircraft carrier strike groups will be kept but the USS George Washington will be retired in 2016, leaving 10 carrier groups. Eleven warships—half of the Navy’s cruiser fleet—will be taken offline or placed in a reduced operating status Marine Corps cuts will include further planned reductions from the current level of 190,000 Marines to 182,000 Marines, with a further cut to 175,000 after 2016 http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/2nd-ame...ilitary-policy/ QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jul 10 2015, 12:52 PM) Dumb nuclear bombs? What is this, the 1950s? itu minuteman... delivery of nuclear warhead can come in many forms... this 1 they are trying out via bomber fighter...You'd figure they at least put a rocket engine on a nuclear warhead by now. |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0516sec
0.59
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:23 PM |