QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ May 16 2015, 06:43 AM)
THIS.. Oil & Gas Careers V8, Upstream and Downstream, Crude Oil (WTI): USD 45.22/bbl
Oil & Gas Careers V8, Upstream and Downstream, Crude Oil (WTI): USD 45.22/bbl
|
|
May 16 2015, 08:02 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Jun 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16 2015, 08:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
509 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
QUOTE(Stamp @ May 15 2015, 11:10 PM) QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ May 16 2015, 06:43 AM) I think already commissioned kot. I'm working on another project that has a couple of similar equipments as Laila. Having some problems now, just want to dig some info about these equipment as reference for troubleshooting purposes. |
|
|
May 16 2015, 04:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,140 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
|
|
|
May 16 2015, 07:16 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
Anyone looking for Instrument Engineer with 3 years experience in Downstream business?
|
|
|
May 16 2015, 07:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,922 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Constellation Cygnus |
I sense that o&g have the strongest sense of ownership on a project in hand... eventhough it's just a replacement of tiny spool of pipe. Everybody is very proudddd
This post has been edited by feekle: May 16 2015, 07:27 PM |
|
|
May 16 2015, 08:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,864 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(feekle @ May 16 2015, 07:26 PM) I sense that o&g have the strongest sense of ownership on a project in hand... eventhough it's just a replacement of tiny spool of pipe. Everybody is very proudddd well….actually the o&g assets belong to the peoples of Malaysia, you know. and Petronas is the caretaker of those assets with PSCs companies and all the service providers backing the company.so we are proud that we have some hand in helping Petronas managing the precious o&g assets, on behalf of the peoples of Malaysia. p/s geez…did i sound like a socialist? This post has been edited by Stamp: May 16 2015, 08:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 16 2015, 10:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,922 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Constellation Cygnus |
QUOTE(Stamp @ May 16 2015, 08:20 PM) well….actually the o&g assets belong to the peoples of Malaysia, you know. and Petronas is the caretaker of those assets with PSCs companies and all the service providers backing the company. U can run for prime minister!so we are proud that we have some hand in helping Petronas managing the precious o&g assets, on behalf of the peoples of Malaysia. p/s geez…did i sound like a socialist? |
|
|
May 16 2015, 10:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,351 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Bintulu, Sarawak |
QUOTE(Stamp @ May 16 2015, 08:20 PM) well….actually the o&g assets belong to the peoples of Malaysia, you know. and Petronas is the caretaker of those assets with PSCs companies and all the service providers backing the company. Truth hurts!so we are proud that we have some hand in helping Petronas managing the precious o&g assets, on behalf of the peoples of Malaysia. p/s geez…did i sound like a socialist? |
|
|
May 16 2015, 11:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,864 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(abgkik @ May 16 2015, 04:24 PM) If my memory is correct, Laila development was a development that wasn't economical to start with. But Shell had the PSC commitment to install that wellhead platform before its PSC contract ended for that particular block. We had a tough time trying to come up with a wellhead platform with the minimal investment as possible and practical. The plan was Shell would develop and install Laila and hand over the platform to PCSB after commissioned right? Ive always wondered whether PCSB ever have issues operating a platform designed by Shell. I wonder whether the operating manuals were written for PCSB's operating philosophy or Shell's. Hope no confusion on PCSB's part! This post has been edited by Stamp: May 16 2015, 11:27 PM |
|
|
May 17 2015, 08:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,597 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
May 17 2015, 10:35 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Nov 2012 |
Dear Sifus,
I have actually PM this message to a number of sifus, but I was then encouraged by Mr. BillySteel to post it in the thread, for open discussion as well as for future reference of others. I would like to seek for your professional advice in choosing between two job offers. The detail of the offers are as follows: 1. Material and Corrosion Engineer JD: Nature of job is project based for up/midstream projects. I am to provide high level technical supports to oil and gas engineering design projects in the Asia Pacific region and to prepare several corrosion related technical reports. Around 90% of my time will be in the office. The company is an engineering consultant company specialized in corrosion studies, metallurgy, asset integrity management particularly for the oil and gas process. Its HQ is based in Indonesia and one of the Malaysian project it completed is the detailed engineering for the replacement of Bekok-C mobile offshore replaement unit (MOPU). 2. Graduate Program JD: This is a 3 years program and the participants are trained to become leading personnel. The program is customized to develop the participants in what they are good at/ the role they wish to become. The company specializes in marine construction and also does construction work for the oil and gas industry. Some of the projects done by the company includes: 1. PETRONAS LNG TRAIN 9 - STEEL STRUCTURE ERECTION WORK, 2. LEKAS PROJECT - EPCIC ALLIANCE FOR THE LNG REGASIFICATION UNIT, ISLAND BERTH AND SUBSEA PIPELINE, 3. YEMEN LNG PROJECT. For your information, I am a fresh graduate with a master degree and bachelor degree in mechanical engineering. I wish to choose the job that allows me to learn more and polish my CV. At the current stage, the salary and benefits are not my concern - I wish to choose the job that offers better learning environment. Your help is very much appreciated and I look forward to your valuable advice. Some sifus have replied me before this (Thank you!) and currently 1. has 2 votes while 2. has 3 votes. 1. was voted mainly for the reasons that I will be able to learn technical skills from the role and it offers challenging environment and better project exposure. 2. was voted mainly for the reasons that it is a structured program and the exit opportunities are better. |
|
|
May 17 2015, 10:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
661 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Yankee Territory |
Brinkman
I believe brinkman asked some us here on the forum in regards to his job opportunities. Sorry for the late reply but didn't have much time to write a detailed explanation. Break it down it looks like he has an option of between being in a general job role versus a specialist. Everyone in every industry faces the same problem but since this is an oil and gas thread so will focus more on oil and gas. Break down every career in the company into two roles 1. The general roles (mostly major companies) 2. The specialist roles (often smaller companies) First, what is your career objective? If you have a specific career objective then it would make your choice easier. If you want to be in the Management/CEO of an Oil and Gas company, your focus will need more general skills on business units and handling business aspects within your company. You yourself don't need specific skills on oil and gas but general knowledge and application of those general knowledge and main ---costing. Whatever anyone tells you, everything in this side boils down to cost and profits, especially in public listed companies because shareholders will chase the directors for more profits and the shit falls down to the management. If you want to be a specialist say inspectors, metalwork, drilling, rotating equipment then tailor yourself to all possible knowledge and development to the said skills. Secondly, Is it possible to move between the two, say from general skill to specialist skill or vice-versa The answer is yes. It just depends on how you put in continual improvement to yourself just like your companies do with themselves. Take professional certs to verify your career progress. Third, Benefits Like companies, employees also need monetary or equivalent rewards...... Fact of life = we work for money. To earn more money you need to make more money! Say if you start at RM 3000 and after 3 years experience at say a rate of 10%? increment a year your salary is about 3993. After you jump normally you can request rarely anything higher than 20-30%. Don't be surprised someone at your same position who have jumped every 2 years and in the same position as you is earning higher. Always look at the total package including healthcare coverage and benefits, training cost reimbursement and benefits, professional development programs, company claims for travel etc.... look at both intrinsic and extrinsic values of your jobs benefits this could include etc. potential skills in new technology. Some people factor in job security, company profile/brand name, project profile, position etc.. into benefit consideration. Specialist often make more money than than most executives in general (source: refer to all salary statistics). I am sure the other experts here will be able to add further to any of the above. |
|
|
May 18 2015, 11:14 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Nov 2012 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Thank you for the detailed explanations! I have some questions: 1. It is mentioned that it is possible to move from general skill to specialist skill and vice versa. Is the movement from specialist to management easier as compared to the movement from management to specialist? 2. A sifu told me that you will need technical knowledge to back you up when you are managing others, which I think is true as it is hard to gain respect from others if you do not have the knowledge. Does this mean the path from specialist to management is better? |
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 11:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,110 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(Stamp @ May 16 2015, 11:25 PM) If my memory is correct, Laila development was a development that wasn't economical to start with. But Shell had the PSC commitment to install that wellhead platform before its PSC contract ended for that particular block. We had a tough time trying to come up with a wellhead platform with the minimal investment as possible and practical. Any tips to join Shell bro? The plan was Shell would develop and install Laila and hand over the platform to PCSB after commissioned right? Ive always wondered whether PCSB ever have issues operating a platform designed by Shell. I wonder whether the operating manuals were written for PCSB's operating philosophy or Shell's. Hope no confusion on PCSB's part! |
|
|
May 18 2015, 01:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,464 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ May 16 2015, 07:08 AM) Drydocks Bags Turret Fabrication Deal from Orwell Offshore for FPSO Layang SKE? Block SK310 used to be Newfield's block.Drydocks World, a Dubai-based provider of maritime and offshore services to the shipping, oil, gas and energy sectors, reported Thursday that it is set to expand on its extensive track record of constructing Turret Mooring Systems, securing a contract from Orwell Offshore to fabricate an external Turret for FPSO (floating production, storage and offloading) Layang for deployment to the Layang field in Block SK310 offshore Sarawak, East Malaysia. Drydocks World’s experienced team will play an integral role in facilitating successful project completion during this fast track project expected to be delivered in 1Q 2016. The technical expertise and innovative solutions at Drydocks World have successfully delivered similar external turrets for FPSO’s and FSRU’s. The external turret for Orwell Offshore will deliver significant improvements in operational effectiveness and weathervaning capabilities on FPSO Layang, enabling FPSO operations in water depths of up to 295 feet (90 meters). Drydocks World’s innovative strategy has lead the company to win global projects for the international energy industry, such as Orwell Offshore, validating our approach into the future. Drydocks World has constructed massive scale projects for world renowned offshore companies, demonstrating the yards vast fabrication capacity while ensuring excellence in safety and quality. As one of the few worldwide specialists capable of constructing such large complex Turret Mooring Systems, Drydocks World has the proven expertise with 4 turrets previously delivered. With the completion of the final module for the world's largest turret approaching, Drydocks World has created a name for the company in successful offshore fabrication. Constructing this turret for Orwell offshore is a milestone in marking the next phase of turret development at Drydocks World and we look forward to working with Orwell Offshore again. Article Date: Friday, May 15, 2015 |
|
|
May 18 2015, 01:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,351 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Bintulu, Sarawak |
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 01:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
661 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Yankee Territory |
QUOTE(Brinkman @ May 18 2015, 12:14 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Thank you for the detailed explanations! I have some questions: 1. It is mentioned that it is possible to move from general skill to specialist skill and vice versa. Is the movement from specialist to management easier as compared to the movement from management to specialist? 2. A sifu told me that you will need technical knowledge to back you up when you are managing others, which I think is true as it is hard to gain respect from others if you do not have the knowledge. Does this mean the path from specialist to management is better? 2. All leaders(managers/supervisors) need to earn the respect of their downline. This is not true, good managers aren't always technically inclined as most people think. However their understanding of the processes is what gives them an added advantage. Most of us leave our jobs because of our managers and higher pay. Rarely people leave their jobs because their manager doesn't know anything. |
|
|
May 18 2015, 05:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,351 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Bintulu, Sarawak |
E&P Malaysia Venture Sdn Bhd. A subsidiary of PCSB. How big is this PSC? Similar like Vestigo?
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 05:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,140 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ May 16 2015, 07:08 AM) Drydocks Bags Turret Fabrication Deal from Orwell Offshore for FPSO Layang Sometimes not understand, how can such not really experience turret design company can secure the Turret EPC project... later swivel, bearing got problem, baru nak pening kepala.. Drydocks World, a Dubai-based provider of maritime and offshore services to the shipping, oil, gas and energy sectors, reported Thursday that it is set to expand on its extensive track record of constructing Turret Mooring Systems, securing a contract from Orwell Offshore to fabricate an external Turret for FPSO (floating production, storage and offloading) Layang for deployment to the Layang field in Block SK310 offshore Sarawak, East Malaysia. Drydocks World’s experienced team will play an integral role in facilitating successful project completion during this fast track project expected to be delivered in 1Q 2016. The technical expertise and innovative solutions at Drydocks World have successfully delivered similar external turrets for FPSO’s and FSRU’s. The external turret for Orwell Offshore will deliver significant improvements in operational effectiveness and weathervaning capabilities on FPSO Layang, enabling FPSO operations in water depths of up to 295 feet (90 meters). Drydocks World’s innovative strategy has lead the company to win global projects for the international energy industry, such as Orwell Offshore, validating our approach into the future. Drydocks World has constructed massive scale projects for world renowned offshore companies, demonstrating the yards vast fabrication capacity while ensuring excellence in safety and quality. As one of the few worldwide specialists capable of constructing such large complex Turret Mooring Systems, Drydocks World has the proven expertise with 4 turrets previously delivered. With the completion of the final module for the world's largest turret approaching, Drydocks World has created a name for the company in successful offshore fabrication. Constructing this turret for Orwell offshore is a milestone in marking the next phase of turret development at Drydocks World and we look forward to working with Orwell Offshore again. Article Date: Friday, May 15, 2015 |
|
|
May 18 2015, 07:01 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
28 posts Joined: Jan 2014 |
Any of you have tips on breathing test for medical checkup?
I have done it last year and passed after like 20+ attempts I have to do another one soon and feels very anxious about it Just one last obstacle before offshore life |
| Change to: | 0.0252sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 10:56 PM |