about 2 years ago i book one unit at iproperty expo because sticker say it's selling fast (and last few months before gov will cancel DIBS). i got the loan approved too. but i got bad feeling about it - no website, brochure cincai one piece of thin paper (even dont give me booklets brochure after i placed the RM500 booking cash).

i ask to see show unit two months since place my booking. they say they still building it, but after that my SA say no show unit cos project sale very good almost sold out. then do search previous project, alam idaman very bad. i decided to cancel even when the SA warned me they wont refund the Rm500 booking. i cancel my booking and i'm glad i did. just sharing my experience and feeling i got when purchasing this project during launching. i still see there's no website about this project.

i suggest whomever considering to buy it to drive there and see the site for yourself. i worked in batu 3 shah alam before (2007-2009). morning and evening traffic is sooo horrible at traffic light to federal there. and sometimes it's flooded when raining too. now not sure if still got the same problem or not.

would ask V residence 2 by MCT shared the same access road right

V2 mct.... spend money with another access behind. .....While Alam Sanjung CB Land. ....just built....and built more....... never put money on local infra....... CB Land = bad developer.= maximise profit.

You are lucky...... while some owners/ investors got invited ......to ghost ship.......got flat.....but pay 490psf........ lol

Luxury flat , new term in real estate. Don't main main!

Only those ghosts will believe this statement, perhaps 3 yrs old budak budak also will listen it. Whole world know patchay is working under cb land and so obvious that open/close of alam tanjung thread is to protect the interest of cb due to so many negative feedbacks of this project. "We welcome constructive feedbacks"? But unable to accept negative feedbacks.

"We welcome all constructive feedbacks and remarks" become "we then put your feedbacks and remarks into trash bin".

As an employee (out of my exact role though), here are some of complaints that some owner/buyers have shared with me:

1. Windows are too small.
2. Colour scheme of facade is not nice or matching to scale model.
3. DB box trunking is not concealed properly.
4. Corridor pipings have no plaster ceiling or concealed.
5. Wash basin in bathrooms too small.

I'll try to bring these issues up with my team and we will do our best to address it.

This post has been edited by accetera: Jun 27 2015, 05:05 PM

Hahaha, "do our best to address it", don't just simply talk lah... We are not three years old kid

Item 1: hack the wall and replaced with new windows/ paint thicker window border to make it looks larger.....no sense at all
Item 2: even big boss Eric Yong say can't do anything, Need to wait jmb take over and change it
Item 4: even big boss Eric Yong give the shitty answer that it is to enable easier maintenance(in case of pipe leaking)stupid excuse again(save cost but say easy maintenance.. If buildd quality is good so easy water leak meh, even some mid cost apartment have plaster ceiling cover that ugly pipe)
Item 5: wah, cb land so generous to replace all the basins with bigger one??? Really???


Don't just simply talk will address it, even big boss Eric Yong say can't, what say you?
If really one of item 1,2,4,5 can be solved by you Patrick , Eric Yong should be fired and replaced by you then..no of fence

IMHO, you should focus on things that can be change...example Like come out with effective management to lower monthly maintenance fee to offset ugly facade, assist in changing to residential rate faster, implement better security like access card inside the lift....all these can be implement to compensate the item 1,2,4,5 above.....please lah..

I am sorry.

We bought this property 2 year ago knowing that :

Effective management that do good maintenance with low monhtly fees

changing to residential rate is what the developer own us

implementation security - the best developer can do is what they own us too.

acess card inside lift is what they promised before i signed spa


your list is what accetera can be change???. it is their duty to deliver. As promised 2 years ago.

come on la.

This post has been edited by tikaram: Jun 27 2015, 08:48 PM

don;t let us down

not like many last time

This post has been edited by tikaram: Jun 27 2015, 08:49 PM

from the photo

left Apartment Taman Bukit Pelangi
middle Avenu crest
right Alam Sanjung

Apartment Taman Bukit Pelangi RM300psf look even better than the Alam Sanjung Services apartment 500psf



Attached thumbnail(s)

FYI, we are committed to practice effective management in order to keep the costs as low as we can. For security issues, I have also upgraded the system to allow for card access in the lifts. The utility rates have been adjusted to be of residential rates.

When I say constructive remarks and feed backs, I meant it to be both positive and negative. But if you choose to make allegations and defamatory statements, then I shall not respond to it here - and let the legal proceedings take place instead.

Are you SERIOUS THAT that looks better???

kinda interesting boss to cb replying to comment in forum..perhaps you want to get some real comments and feedback from the buyer rather than your office staff?

yup. agreed with you. the Apartment Taman Bukit Pelangi indeed way looks better than alam sanjung Services apartment.
the apartment TBP facade structure already looks better liao. and at least the windows size much bigger.
the building color just need to repaint with better color selection it will even stand out more.

to be honest alam sanjung facade kinda looks similar with oug parklane facade.
but AS facade looks much worse than OP facade.

This post has been edited by HELLO HELLO: Jun 29 2015, 05:12 PM

+1 Agree exactly, I thought oug parklane is the worst until I saw this . if the grey paint removed, it will be worst than oug parklane.

What do you expect, CB land used to build MOSTLY mid cost apartment all this while. Their design architecture sucks big time, still come out with outdated and ugly facade.

Even new developer Trinity and ekovest done better job than them.

Just compared with trinity's old project The Zest Kinrara which looks 100 times better than this alam sanjung!

This post has been edited by KimiLau: Jun 29 2015, 05:33 PM

At least Eric yong got gut and come to clarifying things, unlike someone( the original thread starter) who closed the thread and hide under the bed.

Boss. See? So many agree with me.

Alam Sanjung tak cantik la. Me rugi tak untung