List of BT clients i use:
1. BitComet 0.70
2. TuoTu
3. uTorrent (Now)
This post has been edited by deepcool0922: Jan 5 2007, 10:56 PM
P2P BitTorrent Clients Discussion Thread, Discussion and poll
P2P BitTorrent Clients Discussion Thread, Discussion and poll
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 10:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
List of BT clients i use:
1. BitComet 0.70 2. TuoTu 3. uTorrent (Now) This post has been edited by deepcool0922: Jan 5 2007, 10:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 10:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,110 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
i think TS should juz let us list down the bt client we used here
and about the discussion... PLEASE DISCUSS IN HERE BitComet Thread Torrent Thread Tuotu Thread BitTyrant anything i miss out?? btw, the bt client i used got 3 1.) BitComet 2.) Tuotu 3.) Torrent This post has been edited by tan_pang: Jan 5 2007, 10:56 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2007, 10:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Mayb this thread can tell us know which bt most ppl use. can mod make ppl vote?
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 12:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
532 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
first i use bittorrent...that one very slow....then i changed to bitcomet....quite for that....then now i changed to utorrent coz i found out utorrent is faster than bitcomet...
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 12:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 01:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
all clients sooo slow for me
1. Bitcomet 2. uTorrent |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 01:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(pipedream @ Jan 6 2007, 01:00 AM) Streamyx is back now. Speed is back now^^May be you do some tweaking or tuning, the speed will back. Now im using back BitComet, because i downloaded a sercret weapon^^ wahahahaha~~~~~~~ |
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 01:05 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
88 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
Azureus for download and seeding.
Utorrent still got bugs with their super seed mechanism. But then again not all of us create files to upload right so does not matters.. Bitspirit uses Bitcomet's core. So the performance almost the same. So far still the best for super seed is using Bittornado's core. I use it for initial upload. Never use Bitcomet cause it will flood my router with too many unnecessary connection and their DHT too aggressive...the speed so so only.. |
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 01:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,353 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 01:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Akapane @ Jan 6 2007, 01:05 AM) Azureus for download and seeding. Hmmmm i dont seeding. Anyway ur information for me is helpful^^. thank youUtorrent still got bugs with their super seed mechanism. But then again not all of us create files to upload right so does not matters.. Bitspirit uses Bitcomet's core. So the performance almost the same. So far still the best for super seed is using Bittornado's core. I use it for initial upload. Never use Bitcomet cause it will flood my router with too many unnecessary connection and their DHT too aggressive...the speed so so only.. QUOTE(pipedream @ Jan 6 2007, 01:09 AM) Link to asia is ok. hmmmm i think now to west oso ok oredi^^ |
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 08:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Bitcomet and Azureus have been my good friends for long time.
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 08:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,784 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: MY |
bittornado (2003)-> bitcomet -> utorrent (now)
bittornado pros - simple gui n straightforward cons - doesnt support multitracker (back in those days) - doesnt offer much tweak options - 1 cleant for 1 torrent. imagine u leech n seed at sametime =__= bitcomet pros - better gui that bittornado. - customizable & tweakable for optimizing speed cons - err, memory consumptions? utorrent pro - no need installer - as good as bitcomet cons (none so far) *i notice near to unnoticable speed difference between clients. so, if u know what to tweak, theres no reason client A is faster than B or such This post has been edited by e-jump: Jan 6 2007, 08:26 AM |
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 08:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH |
Ares + Torrent will do the job, both in real good speed, last time use LimeWire + BitComet
This post has been edited by sniper69: Jan 6 2007, 08:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 08:39 AM
|
|
VIP
11,594 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Area 51 |
Threads merged
This post has been edited by samurai1337: Jan 6 2007, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Jan 6 2007, 05:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,035 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
bitcomet 0.70 n utorrent the best for me now..
some torrent slow on utorrent den switch to bitcomet very good speed n vice versa |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 09:22 AM
|
|
VIP
11,594 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Area 51 |
I've completely dumped Bitcomet, currently using uTorrent (for local trackers) and Tuotu (for some HK contents)
Though I'm using a 1mbps line, it's very hard to get >100KBps of speed for a single task. |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 09:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
590 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: small town |
Not using Bitcomet anymore... uTorrent now...
I'm using for simple downloading... easy to track local ip.. |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 10:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
277 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
currently using BitComet and uTorrent;
BitComet so far haven't failed me yet, so it's the main I will use.. uTorrent only for some forums' recommendation or "limitation" purpose |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 10:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
900 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
hmm juz went utorrent site .. how come got 2 files ? whats the diff ? stand alone n installation ?
|
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 11:45 PM
|
|
VIP
11,594 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Area 51 |
QUOTE(Peisqo @ Jan 13 2007, 10:15 PM) No difference basically.Installation - just like your usual installer. It's being installed in the standard Program Files folder Stand alone - no installation needed, juz exe. The benefit is, you can save it in your secondary partition/hard drive, and it's unaffected even after you re-format your OS |
| Change to: | 0.0429sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 02:42 AM |