Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

P2P BitTyrant, Selfish BT Client

views
     
TSalmostthere
post Jan 4 2007, 02:14 AM, updated 19y ago

Kepala abah ko
Group Icon
VIP
3,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O



Saw this today and currently downloading it. Will test it later once my torrents complete

http://bittyrant.cs.washington.edu/

QUOTE
Overview

BitTyrant is a new, protocol compatible BitTorrent client that is optimized for fast download performance. BitTyrant is...

    * Fast - During evaluation testing on more than 100 real BitTorrent swarms, BitTyrant provided an average 70% download performance increase when compared to the existing Azureus 2.5 implementation, with some downloads finishing more than three times as quickly.
    * Fair - BitTorrent was designed with incentives in mind: if a user is downloading at 30 KBps, they should upload at 30 KBps. However, due to the unique workload properties of many real-world swarms, this is not always enforced. BitTyrant is designed to make efficient use of your scarce upload bandwidth, rewarding those users whose upload allocations are fair and only allocating excess capacity to other users.
    * Familiar - BitTyrant is based on modifications to Azureus 2.5, currently the most popular BitTorrent client. All of our changes are under the hood. You'll find the GUI identical to Azureus, with optional additions to display statistics relevant to BitTyrant's operation.


QUOTE
FAQ
Q: How is BitTyrant different from existing BitTorrent clients?

BitTorrent differs from existing clients in its selection of which peers to unchoke and send rates to unchoked peers. Suppose your upload capacity is 50 KBps. If you've unchoked 5 peers, existing clients will send each peer 10 KBps, independent of the rate each is sending to you. In contrast, BitTyrant will rank all peers by their receive / sent ratios, preferentially unchoking those peers with high ratios. For example, a peer sending data to you at 20 KBps and receiving data from you at 10 KBps will have a ratio of 2, and would be unchoked before unchoking someone uploading at 10 KBps (ratio 1). Further, BitTyrant dynamically adjusts its send rate, giving more data to peers that can and do upload quickly and reducing send rates to others.
Q: Will BitTyrant work for cable / DSL users?

Yes. Although the evaluation in our paper focuses on users with slightly higher upload capacity than is typically available from US cable / DSL providers today, BitTyrant's intelligent unchoking and rate selection still improves performance for users with less capacity. All users, regardless of capacity, benefit from using BitTyrant.
Q: Won't BitTyrant hurt overall BitTorrent performance if everyone uses it?

This is a subtle question and is treated most thoroughly in the paper. The short answer is: maybe. A big difference between BitTyrant and existing BitTorrent clients is that BitTyrant can detect when additional upload contribution is unlikely to improve performance. If a client were truly selfish, it might opt to withhold excess capacity, reducing performance for other users that would have received it. However, our current BitTyrant implementation always contributes excess capacity, even when it might not improve performance. Our goal is to improve performance, not minimize upload contribution.


user posted image

download here

Alternate DL server here

Feedback is welcome

This post has been edited by almostthere: Jan 4 2007, 02:18 AM
bobtiang
post Jan 4 2007, 02:37 AM

I live in a 6 STARS Hotel
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 冰城

have you tried uTorrent? let us know how does this one compare to uTorrent.
I found that uTorrent is better than bitCommet, at least it used less resource.

This post has been edited by bobtiang: Jan 4 2007, 02:38 AM
TSalmostthere
post Jan 4 2007, 02:39 AM

Kepala abah ko
Group Icon
VIP
3,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O



Testing it now. Seems my Azureus configurations skills have gone rusty since I've started using utorrent since it's 1.1 version. Will let you know later
Lingo20052003
post Jan 4 2007, 04:41 PM

Jatt84
****
Senior Member
602 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


So what is the result..good to use or not???
CherylDarryl
post Jan 4 2007, 05:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
647 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


yea i also curious about to know too compare to utorrent xD

izzit reliable?? user-friendly?? memory usage?? and the speed??
wongzai
post Jan 5 2007, 03:44 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
780 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


my concern is the memory usage n oso peer connection .....waiting for ur result ya....
Vervain
post Jan 5 2007, 07:20 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
my concern is the maximum download speed you can ooze out from this client. let us know
skylinegtr34rule4life
post Jan 5 2007, 08:14 PM

13k elite :P
********
Senior Member
13,340 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: back from vacation XD



let us no can whether this torrent can bypass the stupid throttling. rclxms.gif
Andrewhajime
post Jan 5 2007, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,171 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: K.lumpur ... heart of M'sia



does it consume a lot of resource ?
tps18489
post Jan 5 2007, 09:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,514 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I presume it consumes as much resources as Azureus since it uses Azureus' source code which is powered by Java. smile.gif
ForCe
post Jan 7 2007, 10:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: OaSiS



Tuotu compare wif this , which 1 better ?
eXPeri3nc3
post Jan 7 2007, 11:04 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



Hmmm no feedbacks so far? unsure.gif
reeyon
post Jan 8 2007, 12:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Johor Bahru


Clone of Azureus, eat more resources though.


Akapane
post Jan 8 2007, 01:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
Its bad for the big swarm enough said. The uploading algorithm is quite different from other clients. Different from original bittorent or Azureus spec.

Can it break the throttle thingy? Azureus can't so this client also can't.

Better speed? Maybe in certain type of swarm. Normal swarm speed not improve much. Gazilion seeds of course makes a different.

Nothing to shout about really since we got lots of matured clients like Utorrent, Bitcomet(even though got lots of haters from clients makers), Azureus original, Bittornado(or other clients based on it) and Mainline clients to play with.





shockw@ve
post Jan 14 2007, 08:16 AM

d[-_-]b
Group Icon
VIP
1,889 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Check the writeup on it here: http://torrentfreak.com/bittyrant-the-self...torrent-client/

It's a BT client which shouldn't be used since grabbing stuff via BT isn't a one-way street. BitThief is another client in a similar vein.
tan_pang
post Jan 14 2007, 10:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,110 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(shockw@ve @ Jan 14 2007, 08:16 AM)
Check the writeup on it here: http://torrentfreak.com/bittyrant-the-self...torrent-client/

It's a BT client which shouldn't be used since grabbing stuff via BT isn't a one-way street. BitThief is another client in a similar vein.
*
so, what write in the thread description 'Selfish' is true??
i better get off of this bt client
and ban their ip shakehead.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0160sec    0.93    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 10:31 AM