Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah

views
     
KYPMbangi
post Feb 13 2015, 12:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 13 2015, 12:17 AM)
tell US.. we want our F18 to fire R-77 boleh tak laugh.gif
*
Even if we have the sos code, we dun have the infras and the expertise to do such thing
KYPMbangi
post Feb 13 2015, 06:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


I support the jet streamlining

Heavy - MKM
Medium - Hornet
Light - Hawk
KYPMbangi
post Feb 13 2015, 09:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


BTR-3 platform with 90mm Cockerill gun, the BTR-3E1

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 13 2015, 09:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


RPG-7 styled weapon for US army? we'll see..

QUOTE
US Army Tests Soviet-Designed Rocket Launcher

user posted image

U.S. Army infantry platoons may one day be fighting with an Americanized version of the famous, Soviet RPG 7 anti-armor weapon.

Army testers recently evaluated Airtronic USA Inc.'s RPG 7 as part of service's annual Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment.

"The durability, simplicity, low cost and effectiveness of the RPG 7 has made it the most widely used man-portable anti-armor weapon in the world," according to the AEWE's Systems Book of selected technologies chosen for this year's experiment.

But the Airtronic RPG is quite different than the 1960s-era Soviet weapon. Its tube is made from 4140/4150 ordnance grade barrel steel and it features several sections of rail for attaching optics. It weighs about 14 pounds unloaded and without optic.

Many soldiers involved with the experiment have faced enemy forces in Iraq and Afghanistan that were armed with RPG weapons, Army officials from the Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, Ga., said.

"There was a great deal of interest because there were a number of guys that had been deployed had seen it from the other perspective," said Harry Lubin, chief of the Experimentation Branch of MCOE's Maneuver Battle Lab.

[Military]


USA Airtronic RPG-7
user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 14 2015, 02:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 14 2015, 02:35 AM)
Reports: Pro-Russian separatist forces storming Debaltsevo city

Initial reports are emerging that pro-Russian separatists have stormed the city of Debaltsevo from the east within the last hour or so. Latest reports say intense street fighting breaking out in suburban area. Casualties already piling up for both sides.
*
Last minute strike before the ceasefire


KYPMbangi
post Feb 14 2015, 03:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 14 2015, 02:54 AM)
Donno how much they can take before sunday. There's estimated 7,000 Ukraine gov soldiers & paramilitary units in the city.
*
Prolly not much, but they are tightening the pocket

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 12:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Harbin Z-20 China medium lift helicopter aka prc blackhawk

user posted image

user posted image


KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 01:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 15 2015, 01:00 PM)
anybody know why we chose pt-91m?? other than weight, the t84m seems a lot better with capability to launch atgm and also has active protection, and its only heavier by 5 tons which is not really a lot considering the amount of goodies it has compared to pt91m
are we gonna get anymore tanks??
*
The polish accept barter trade deal

Also bear in mind that the t84 tested here in the year 2000 is the baseline version and is different from the t84m which only produced in 2008, no active protection, no advanced panoramic optics, no atgm firing capability yet

user posted image

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Feb 15 2015, 01:40 PM
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 02:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 15 2015, 02:32 PM)
If we decide to buy more tanks what do u think will be most suitable for us?? T84m?? K2?? Type 10??
*
Personally? T-90S Bhishma aka Indian T-90, and mod it with PT-91M's similar fcs, engine, tracks

user posted image


KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 03:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Feb 15 2015, 03:19 PM)
my thoiught exactly. they both share the same design(both are heavily upgraded T-72), so the boys has little trouble migrating to one another

nothing wrong with PT-91 but since the poles is withdrawing them from front line service, there's no reason that they gonna continue the production line. now they ar concentrating on production of their rosomak instead

problem is, Russia-EU relation isn't good right now
*
India ady produced their own t90s, the only obstacle is to ask for license production from russia
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 03:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Feb 15 2015, 03:47 PM)
mampu ke kita nk license produce menatang tu?
*
tak lah, india still needs license from russia to produce every t90 tank in their own factory
so even we buy the tanks from the indian factory, they still needs russia license to green light the production
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 03:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(AxeFire @ Feb 15 2015, 03:50 PM)
is there any upgrades that can be done to the PT-91?

if so maybe it can become a MT-92
MT Because its produces (probably by DRB-Hicom) in Malaysia and
92 because its a upgraded 91  biggrin.gif
*
umm.. no, the difference is too great between both version
modifying the vanilla version would cost more
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 05:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


I'd say no to making the tanks ourselves, at least not on mbt level yet

But I do wanna see deftech making light tank first, maybe joint venture with the turks to license produce their light tank. Our light tanks (scorpion, stormer) needs replacements
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 05:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 15 2015, 05:16 PM)
Type 10 for me
hehe
but only after the second batch of Pendekar
*
Ada sos pedas ke ni? brows.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 05:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 15 2015, 05:28 PM)
Anyone know what kind of helmet is this? I noticed some US soldiers are wearing it? I took this from a TV series. Is this US new combat helmet?

user posted image
*
Last ship.. it's so so bad.. ep4 I dropped it.. sweat.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 08:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 15 2015, 08:30 PM)
Would rather the army save money and get more modern  tanks compared to those soviet era design tanks

Pt91 although  heavily upgraded it still in end an soviet  era design
*
I don't think we gonna stray away far from the T series, as they ady use the base to train and develop doctrine from the pt91m
Well, maybe they could get away from the russian tanks but I still reckon it gonna be under 50-tonnes class
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 08:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 15 2015, 08:42 PM)
They're made of what anyway? I don't see it as being made of ballistic Kevlar. I don't get why SF guys prefer wearing these kinds of helmets.
*
The idea is more situational awareness, and less weight, compared to normal ballistic helmet
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 09:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 15 2015, 08:55 PM)
the crew requirement is still the same
just that they need to familiarize driving a heavier and wider vehicle. I also read before that K2 can be mod for wider track due to korean experience during  korean war. Plus, the vehicle thermal insulation can be removed since we dont have winter here

turkey "Altay" is worse at 60+ton. Dunno what they add until even heavier than the original K2
*
Standard NATO tanks, 55-65 tonnes is normal
East asian (k2, type10) tanks is blardy expensive..

So the requirement is 3 men crew, autoloader, 50 tonnes class (maybe max 55)
Is there a non-russian tanks that fill all this?
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 11:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 15 2015, 11:01 PM)
Currently watching Special Forces-Philippine Marine recon on History channel.

OMG, In the middle of parachute jump test (only using just ONE Huey helicopter no less, bcoz Pinoys totally don't have any flying airplanes), the helicopter was called away due to some kind of clashes with communist guerrillas in another part of country, so jump test is postponed a few days.

It's so distressingly ridiculous, made me ROFL  and shed a tear in bewilderment at the ridiculousness of it all.  laugh.gif
*
Go try watch PNP-SAF documentary, really long history involved in several political coup being on the side of the "people", while the military is on marcos side after that resulting in their decades of negligence and underfunding. All SAF operators black beret is earned after a test mission, encounter the enemy and come back alive then you can "graduate"

Oh well, that is all before the maguindanao massacre happened..
KYPMbangi
post Feb 15 2015, 11:51 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(heavyduty @ Feb 15 2015, 11:25 PM)
the MA uses dirtbikes for that no?
*
Never see the dirtbikes carry atgm, but manpads yes
I suppose they can carry eryx as it was the lightest of them all

Metis on land rover
user posted image

10 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0577sec    0.05    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 03:39 AM