Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah

views
     
KYPMbangi
post Feb 17 2015, 04:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE
Rafale proposal 'effectively dead' as Dassault bid not cheapest

Even as three Rafale fighters line up in Bengaluru for eye-popping aerobatics displays at the Aero India 2015 exhibition this week, senior ministry of defence (MoD) sources say the proposal to buy the French fighter is "effectively dead".

The reason: During three years of negotiations between Dassault and MoD officials in the so-called "contract negotiation committee" (CNC), it has emerged that Dassault's bid was actually higher than that of the Eurofighter Typhoon, not lower as the MoD had announced on January 31, 2012.

Dassault had submitted a sketchy commercial bid, and when the CNC obtained details from the French company to arrive at the actual cost of the Rafale, the figures added up to significantly more than had originally been estimated.

The confusion is due partly to MoD inexperience with "life cycle costing" (LCC). The global tender for 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) was the first time the MoD was awarding a contract based on LCC. This meant the winner would not be the fighter with the cheapest purchase price; instead the chosen fighter would be the one that was cheaper to buy, fly, maintain and overhaul over its 30-40 year service life.

[Business-Standard]


tldr:- rafale maintenance and life-cycle cost shots up, would cost more than the typhoon

Also I hear egypt's €5.2 billion rafale deal is on actually on a loan credit, by the french and saudi banks

KYPMbangi
post Feb 17 2015, 02:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Looks like BAE system offers more hawk for their typhoon mrca deal, though I dunno if free or discounted hawks
KYPMbangi
post Feb 17 2015, 03:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 17 2015, 02:49 PM)
I think you got it backward.
*
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 17 2015, 02:57 PM)
Dont think so. The last i check f22 can only do up and down

Su 30 can both up n down and a liitke side
*
Both planes have one axis thrust vectoring, just that mkm/mki axis pivot is little sideways so it's classify as 2.5D TVC, while the f22 is 2D TVC

user posted image

while it is more than 2D but is less than 3D, so its 2.5D laugh.gif

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Feb 17 2015, 03:13 PM
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 02:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 18 2015, 01:01 AM)
there are plan for 2nd batch,
but only when there is better radar will be available to us
but right now we are more focus on MIG replacement
*
I think Irbis-E ady available?
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 04:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 18 2015, 04:20 AM)
hybrid laugh.gif
*
Too bad zhuk aesa can't still match it's pesa counterpart
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 02:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 18 2015, 01:46 PM)
So I just got news that Dassault just give a counter offer to RMAF brows.gif
*
The news only says 16 units only.. not really an offer unless got more free/discount stuff
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 02:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


RMN Super Lynx with lightweight torpedo

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 02:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 18 2015, 02:14 PM)
now wait Sukoi and Saab offer too....  biggrin.gif
*
Sukhoi I dun think they in mrca? more mkm?
Saab ady offer very attractive package but still no bite
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 02:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 18 2015, 02:40 PM)
the picture from KLS is from AF PR jadi..
no komen
*
mdf pun ada pics of QRA shed from media day, so I dun think there's a problem
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 03:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(OvenBaked @ Feb 18 2015, 02:57 PM)
Asean main fighter jet

user posted image

Credited to Sandy Rud
*
the indon sukhoi is 3dcg from deviantart though
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 03:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Msian & US personnel as monitoring team in PH

QUOTE
International Monitoring Team inspecting the weapons returned by MILF at Camp Siongco, the headquarters of 6th Division in Datu Odin Sinsuat town in Maguindanao


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

[MILF returns SAF weapons]
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 03:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(James Bum @ Feb 18 2015, 03:43 PM)
Fark!!!!!!! US wanna export its freedom here and SG will be it's doormat:

http://www2.bangkokpost.com/news/asia/4784...by-2018-us-navy
*
US navy ady stationed their ships regularly but not officially at sgpore for many years lar

No need to be paranoid
KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 08:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(DA777 @ Feb 18 2015, 08:19 PM)
can but 100% under state Sultan control, if under state government mati la. hari2 civil war if state gov and fed gov gaduh.
*
QUOTE(James Bum @ Feb 18 2015, 08:33 PM)
Ya something like that to have check and balance. I think Johor has but not to the scale of National Guard.
*
QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 18 2015, 08:40 PM)
Dont give sultan too much power
Maybe one or two thousand troops enough
*
STOP

This is not the place nor time to discuss such far-fetched idea..


KYPMbangi
post Feb 18 2015, 10:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 18 2015, 10:10 PM)
The meteor has further range than the rafale's radar maximum tracking range. Meaning that Rafale could only fully utilise the meteor with help from AWACS or GCI radar.

Americans had most experience in war knowing much how missile guidance works better. Russians got their experience by gathering feedback and report from allies syria, libya, iraq, serbia and also from 3rd party insurgents/militants. With help of russian researchers, the serbians managed to track and shoot down stealth F-117. French weapons have some success as proven in several wars.

The bosnian war displayed best result of french vs russian weapons before america intervened in later 1994. Result is french weapons not too advanced than russian weapons where french forces suffered high losses and failed to defeat serbian forces.

Mig-35 vs rafale, which do you prefer?
*
The migs not even in mrca list.. why would need to consider? sweat.gif

f18sh ftw


KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 04:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 18 2015, 11:51 PM)
can get help from india on that.. their new upgrade plan will feature air-conditioning system on their t-90s produced domestically
btw PT-91M have aircon  meh ? I thought also dont have laugh.gif
*
Yes our pt-91m have aircon inside, just not a really strong one as the coolest it can get is 26-27c

The only thing I worry about the tank is co2 ventilation system, after firings main/mg guns the inside reported to have unsafe levels of co2 accumulation

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Feb 19 2015, 04:22 AM
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 04:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 19 2015, 02:10 AM)


Russia tank factory Uralvagonzavod

new tank design look into APS
*
lol kesian that rc tank.. laugh.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 12:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 19 2015, 10:53 AM)
This T90 has separate crew compartment and ammo storage like western tanks? If not, this upgraded T90 is not a good tank. T90 is just remake t72b with cramped interior and deadly autoloader known of ripping off tank crew's hand. No thanks.

Russia should come up with new mbt. T90 is no match against insurgents rpg29 and IED. M1a2sep, challenger2, leopard 2a6, leclerc would destroy t90 easily.
*
You need to understand military doctrine is different in each and every country, that's why russian is sticking to their design and western sticking to theirs, and israel made their own tanks from their own experience

Autoloader exist and will stay on russian tank cuz it is actually faster to load the 2-part russian tank ammunition (propellant & projectile) automatically using machines than using an actual crew, by comparison to western tank the difference is almost negligible to compare machine vs crew in loading their 1-part western tank ammunition

Russian dun have to design a western style tanks to be on the same level, sure arguments like active protection vs passive protection would continue till kingdom come but there's a an actual reason why certain things is the way they are rather than trying to copy others which in the end might be incompatible with their doctrine
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 12:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(James Bum @ Feb 19 2015, 12:24 PM)
What do they use to keep cool in summer then?
*
Roll down the windows saja lol.. or just use the default car fan?
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 08:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 19 2015, 02:19 PM)
Autoloader is good if there's isolation from crew like in leclerc & merkava, tank crew don't get to touch nor see the autoloader. Russia got into serious financial crisis that they cancelled the t95 project with proper autoloader separated from crew compartment and separate ammo storage.

T72/80/90 are nothing more than 70's era tech doctrine. The design fails big time under present day. Since t95 was scrapped and russians lost the t80 factory to ukraine after soviet union dissolved, they have only t72 left and give it modificaton then renamed it t90.

*
The t95 is now replaced by the armata project which is a multiple weapons platform that will features unmanned turret, turret bustle ammo compartment, improved armor, active protection system and front engine. The design emphasizes more of the crew protection priority while still maintaining the medium weight tank class for mobility like their predecessor

please dun hate russian tank, every tank is built differently for different purpose, you can love one but dun hate the other..
same goes for shitty tanks like arjun and sheridan
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 08:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 19 2015, 07:39 PM)
The Bradley's are slower than abrams that they were trailing behing while abrams spearhead enemy defenses. At least abram could destroy t72. At the other hand, t72's 125mm failed to punch through abram's armour, only capable of damaging tracks, turrets and engines at most.
*
Totally wrong statement here.. the bradley can keep up with the abrams tank formation
In fact bradley served as forward scout for the tanks in the gulf war, and got more tank kill counts with their tow missiles than the abrams

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Feb 19 2015, 08:45 PM

10 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0645sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:55 PM