Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah

views
     
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 09:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 19 2015, 09:25 PM)
CMN to unveil the upgraded Combattante BR 71 (Baynunah class) Mk II Corvette

French shipyard CMN, part of Privinvest holding company, will unveil a new version of its famous Baynunah class corvette during IDEX/NAVDEX 2015 defense exhibition which starts on Sunday in Abu Dhabi. Based on the sea proven Combattante BR 71 corvette, the new Mk II evolution incorporates the latest innovations from CMN's research and development. It also leverages some of the design work from the FS56 Fast Attack Craft series.

user posted image

detail
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?o...sk=view&id=2428
*
Hope they also to be considered in msian corvette programme icon_rolleyes.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 10:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 19 2015, 09:34 PM)
What hate are you referring? I only speak the truth. The Russians already knew the their tanks have been inferior in 80's compared to western heavy tanks. Because of lack of budget in their financial crisis, they had no choice but to drop the heavy tank project & came up with toned down T80 instead to replace aging t64. Then in 90's after seeing the superiority of abrams & challengers, they came up with t95 project. Because of financial situation their plan for proper t95 was again being cancelled and substituted with remake t72 renamed t90.

Today, russia is earning a lot by buying cheap oil from IS and they expect American might intervene with ukraine conflict, the Russians finally gave greenlight for their heavy tank project weighing >50tons.

Regarding the bradley scouts you mentioned, they operate in small numbers recon only and will engage only if being spotted and attacked. Usually, these scouts would wait for abrams platoon to move in for the kill. Range of TOW2 missiles are about 3~4 miles. They only provide support fire behind abrams. Abrams guns max range about 3 miles.
*
Meh.. ima just gonna give hint that russian sticks to the things that won them the world war 2

Bradley is ahead of the abrams cuz the mbt needs to stop and refuel every 3-5 hours and their filter cleaned of sands before moving again, so the bradleys dun wanna wait for the slowpoke tanks move ahead to take the most kill possible. lol habis cerita. true story believe meh~
KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 11:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(madoka @ Feb 19 2015, 11:06 PM)
for the bold parts, i think that's why Sing and Indo chose Leopard. They have an excellent Weight to power output ratio and their maintenance is easy to be done. As an example you can change and replace the block engine of Leopard in less than an hour meanwhile you need at least 8 hour to replace the block engine in T-72 series.
*
PT-91M French RENK 1000hp engine also need less than an hour to replace, deswai we choose it rather than the default engine thumbup.gif

user posted image


KYPMbangi
post Feb 19 2015, 11:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kungfugymnast @ Feb 19 2015, 11:28 PM)
The PT91 was less suitable as proven in sulu invasion, the hilly terrain leaves the twardy with limited range. Attack helicopter like hokum & havoc are more suitable, these choppers could kill more insurgents entering our country by boats effectively before they reach our sabah shore.
*
The tanks arent even bit considered to face the sulu, the condor and adnan is ady enough for the terrorist
Lahad datu area is actually pretty nice with some small hills here and there, and it is a felda plantation area so the roads in and out of the area have been established

And pt91m on felda areas? normal playground for them

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Feb 19 2015, 11:55 PM
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 12:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Feb 20 2015, 12:29 AM)
I seriously believe the next evolution in tank gun is the adoption of 140mm gun. that has enough kinetic energy to destroy an enemy tank over 7km away
*
7km is already on the edge of the horizon if on flat land, need something like this to target acquisition?

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 09:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 20 2015, 09:23 AM)
WTF happened? I was away for just 1-2 days, now forum has degenerated into Abrams vs T-90 cockfight.  laugh.gif
*
sweat.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 11:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 20 2015, 11:02 AM)
More hull for rmn duty.  Plus, it should complement our gowind class. Our gowind is geared toward anti-submarine

It a missile covertte.. so it would be mainly anti-ship duty. What missile it will be equid.. that the question. I hoping for brahmos though unlikely given the size. Vl launch brahmoss need alot of space even with slanted launch tube due to its long size. And it just a 1500 vessel so what it can carry  is quite limited as well 

From the dmse model, look like its missile stack will be on top of the hull instead of a vl system.
*
Kena tunggu until gowind weapons announced, then most likely the corvette weapons will be the same as the gowind

Though rmn still a loyal exocet customer.. one of their biggest customer too
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 20 2015, 11:40 AM)
Though i was hoping rmn can diversified  their missile arsenal like how our airforce with both western and eastern fighters

There report we show interest in brahmos before but it have soon die down. Having a supersonic missile does give our navy added firepower rather than the  subsonic excoet
Kedah class will be upgraded later or so i heard. There plans for it but funding remain the main concern. Again it all hear say but most likely excocet again. Wonder why we are so loyal to excocey? Cheap? Or lobbying?

But given it cost of upgrading, i personally think it more cost effective to get new hulls and equid it with more capabale equitments. Like the saying no matter what you add to a old horse it still in the end a old horse

The coastal patrol duty are slowly being given to our coast guard equivalent. Our navy are slowly venturing out of the coastal region and onto deeper waters. Thus, the need of more capable vessel.
*
exocet prolly one of the most affordable, long range, with good battle records in the market, one of the most common asm nowadays

I know the navy actually wants kongsberg nsm
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 12:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 20 2015, 11:58 AM)
If really wanna put extra-large caliber 150mm gun into a small enough mobile carriage, an assault gun/tank destroyer configuration where gun is directly installed on an enlarged hull also can be considered, although loss of rotating turret could be a major handicap.
*
150mm is howitzer level ady laugh.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 12:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Feb 20 2015, 12:03 PM)
the guy's posts got "i'm always right, you guys are wrong" indications all over it..  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
this is like watching LTZ vs alaskanbunny all over again  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
*
the guy just can't take there are pro and cons to everything, also not a healthy conversation
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 12:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 20 2015, 12:16 PM)
Actually NSM more cheaper than Exocet Block 3, plus "stealth" capability. also smaller.
*
Any sos on the cost? hmm.gif
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 12:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 20 2015, 12:38 PM)
NSM cost close to usd 3 million each. Exocet about usd 3.5 million  smile.gif

anyway NSM got small warhead than Exocet, but due to technology/design it get more higher rate to hit enemy target。
*
Good, what we waiting for thumbup.gif
nsm ftw
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 06:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Breaking News

A Royal thai air force F-16 taking part in Cobra gold 2015 have just crashed this afternoon

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 06:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(nikita zuleica @ Feb 20 2015, 06:49 PM)
Why duntyphoon just shoot tu95 down
*
Cuz that's exactly what the russians wants
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 08:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Feb 20 2015, 06:48 PM)
Breaking News

A Royal thai air force F-16 taking part in Cobra gold 2015 have just crashed this afternoon

user posted image
*
Update: Pilot killed.. RIP, it's single-seat version

Thai fighter jet crashes during drill; pilot killed

BANGKOK: A Thai air force F-16A fighter jet crashed during a drill in central Thailand, killing the pilot, an air force spokesman said.

The single-seat jet crashed at the air force's training ground in Lopburi province during a weapon-training flight, Air Vice Marshal Montol Suchookorn said.

He said the body of the 30-year-old pilot was found in the wreckage and air force officers were investigating the cause of the crash.

Thailand's air force has about 50 active F-16s in three fleets. The crashed jet was first used in 1988 and has undergone regular maintenance, Montol told The Associated Press.

In 2010, another F-16A crashed near the Thai-Myanmar border during a training flight, killing the pilot. A year later, two F-16 planes taking part in a joint military exercise with the US crashed in northeastern Thailand but the pilots safely ejected.

Earlier, it was reported that the fate of the pilot was unknown.

[NST]
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 09:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Feb 20 2015, 09:17 PM)
Don't buy anything significant from US in 2013?
*
We actually do have a deal from the US in 2013, but dunno why it's not listed in there
KYPMbangi
post Feb 20 2015, 10:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 20 2015, 10:30 PM)
I don't think this is Anti-China alliance. Prolly just limited power for countering internal problems like rebellions or insurgencies among members.
*
Asean country mostly like to keep to themselves, having other boots on the ground is like asking for more trouble
KYPMbangi
post Feb 21 2015, 03:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 21 2015, 02:53 PM)
Video showing a russian SU-27 intercepted a Portuguese P-3 Orion on a Baltic Sea. But some people question the authenticity of this video, claiming that it is a highly realistic CGI model. What do you think?


*
looks cgi to me
KYPMbangi
post Feb 22 2015, 08:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 21 2015, 10:08 PM)
Israel , Singapore and china .....
*
china not really, we already bought some fn-6 sam from them
I do think we can buy some low level weapons from them
KYPMbangi
post Feb 22 2015, 02:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Feb 22 2015, 12:38 PM)
 
definition low level weapon, how to determine ? ...
for me we can buy training Jet, MBT, SPH, Attack Helicopter, patrol boat/ship, LPD, missile, boom, from china, value for money. good capability/price (CP)
*
stand alone weapons that no need maintenance and easy to for local mro to repair, at least no need to send to china if something does happen
I think the fn-6 deal is like testing the waters for future acquisition, just let's see how it goes


10 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2169sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 06:08 PM