This what i call loyalty. Only way to rescue the company.

Good for you.

👍👍👍

It's 128 pages already, next thread?

I didn't watched the presentation..not sure if there's a replay of it.

Looks like 20-25% faster than the 290X.

Catalyst 12.11? Not even into PC at that time.

Oh yeah,where's Acid?

Acid_RuleZz

This post has been edited by Minecrafter: Jun 24 2015, 09:53 PM

Still, it's a pretty interesting card indeed, even though the performance isn't really up to expectations.

It will be very intriguing to see how HBM is going to be the basis for future AMD/nVidia GPUs.

Having new technology on the table is always a good thing. Wish we have new tech on the CPU front, which is sorely lacking right now.

You start lar. Compile all fury x n 390x reviews n drivers etc

Yeah,a high-end card that is short.Kinda weird TBH.

No more GDDRx.But i think NVidia GPUs will use HBM2..and use GDDR5 until HBM2 comes out.

Wait for AMD Zen... Broadwell and Skylake..the only improvement i like is the iGP.

soon there be driver to added to Fury X performance.. all this benchmark base on early beta drive ? hm

it is accurate benchmark confirmed by AMD matt he also said ROPs is causing most of the bottleneck.

As I suspected, GCN architecture really isn't bandwidth limited in first place. HBM is just being used to lower the power consumption and the power saving is reserved for GPU core instead.

Which is irrelevant for most gamers as they will likely to use discrete cards rather than the IGP. Worst still those chips are not intended to compete with APUs due to their pricing.

I really wish Intel increased the core count of their chips - it's 2015 already and Intel still stubbornly sticks with a dual core on their i3s...

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 10:06 PM

cstkl1,Acid is online..guess he's making the V13. Welp,he went off,guess i can make it.

Well for a cheap Dota 2 build..hmm..could work.

Inb4 the one after Skylake.

i3 - 4 cores and 8 threads.
i5 - 6 cores and 12 threads.
i7 - 8 cores and 16 threads.



This post has been edited by Minecrafter: Jun 24 2015, 10:10 PM

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList....y23b00pdnh00053

Looks like only sapphire is 649.

TechPowerUp
- 15.5 Beta
PC Perspective
- 15.15 beta
Tom's hardware
- 14.2/15.4beta
Hardware Canucks
- 15.15
OC3D
- 15.5
HardOCP
- 15.15
Guru3D
?
Bit-Tech
- 15.15 launch driver
Hexus
- 15.15 beta
VMod
- 15.15?
TechFrag
Not a review.
Hardware FR
?
Techreport
- 15.5 beta
PCWorld
?
PC Gamer
- 15.15
Hardware Canucks
- 15.15

From ocn

wow 4gb can do wonders on fury this shows that sheer memory size isnt a main factor. thats something new

Iris Pro 6200 pretty much made the purchase of discrete GPU under RM400 a joke. With such trend continue and Nvidia/AMD don't have a plan to change their strategy for low end GPU, soon they can outpower RM500 GPU, which is the sweet-spot budget of many casual gamers.

Don't think intel will jump to 8cores for consumer i7 that fast, unless there's some serious competition or they bottlenecked on providing any new architectural improvement...

The previously rumored hexacores config do sounds more probable, seeing that they actually do tried to lower down the price for entry level hexacores Haswell-E (5820k)

i3 3C6T
i5 6C6T
i7 6C12T

This post has been edited by Human10: Jun 24 2015, 10:31 PM

Sry guys, i should've create a new thread before Fury X embargo lifted.

Please continue the discussions in the new thread.

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=3618815