http://www.overclock.net/t/1561860/various...-fury-x-reviews
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
|
|
 Jun 24 2015, 08:43 PM
|
 
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:45 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Fury x like tx. Only reference. No ref not allowed
http://www.overclock.net/t/1561860/various...-fury-x-reviews |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:48 PM
|
 
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 08:28 PM) http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...arrives-21.html So it lags behind the 980Ti and the Titan X is some games, but outperforms both cards in other games? Only reviewer worth reading Conclusion. Something off with oc3d crysis 3... Anyway dont like him. So dont bother The card trades blows with 980ti n is king for Fc4, acu, .. ( both has amd tesselation optimised drivers.. So lol.. We know that from 390x drivers.. They reduced the tessalation.. So not apple to apple) Thief, Metro LL Suprise it can do 4k. Now just have to see gamers actualy performance whether there is stutter.   Interesting nonetheless, considering it is the first card to use HBM... Also one thing - it looks like the Fury X isn't really a good overclocker... This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 08:50 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:52 PM
|
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005 
|
Tomshardware does good power consumption measurements
interesting to see that Fury X uses 220+ watts only. better than 980 Ti. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:55 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 08:52 PM) Tomshardware does good power consumption measurements Could be nice for a mini-ITX build though - imagine putting this beast in a Silverstone SG13? interesting to see that Fury X uses 220+ watts only. better than 980 Ti.  |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:56 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
So the conclusion is:
Solid card, but isn't particularly impressive, though it's pretty nice to see some new tech on the table. This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 08:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 08:56 PM
|
Senior Member
790 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: "siew bao" town
|
The result looks ok for me... keep waiting for nano ver.
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 08:28 PM) http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...arrives-21.html guru3d have 5k resolution results for fury x. no idea what settings but the fps didn't had a big hit for vram limitations. i only read till half when my mate asking to play dota 2 lolOnly reviewer worth reading Conclusion. Something off with oc3d crysis 3... Anyway dont like him. So dont bother The card trades blows with 980ti n is king for Fc4, acu, .. ( both has amd tesselation optimised drivers.. So lol.. We know that from 390x drivers.. They reduced the tessalation.. So not apple to apple) Thief, Metro LL Suprise it can do 4k. Now just have to see gamers actualy performance whether there is stutter. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:09 PM
|
Senior Member
3,345 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i would say 980Ti = R9 Fury X in terms of performance.
Both may have different values in other department, in terms of acoustic, power consumption, form factor etc. I would go for Fury X if im looking at the performance alone. But as im seeking different values, i would hold my purchase for new GPU. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:24 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 24 2015, 09:09 PM) i would say 980Ti = R9 Fury X in terms of performance. For me, I'll get the Fury X, mainly for the form factor... Both may have different values in other department, in terms of acoustic, power consumption, form factor etc. I would go for Fury X if im looking at the performance alone. But as im seeking different values, i would hold my purchase for new GPU. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:27 PM
|
Senior Member
5,043 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Putrajaya
|
Beats both the Titan X and GTX980Ti in a few games,loses out to the Titan X and GTX980Ti in some games.
I wonder what will be the reaction of people who just bought the R9 Fury X lol.  |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:32 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:27 PM) Beats both the Titan X and GTX980Ti in a few games,loses out to the Titan X and GTX980Ti in some games. ...and loses out quite a margin though... I wonder what will be the reaction of people who just bought the R9 Fury X lol. Still it would be very interesting to see how the card 'grows' over time - as more software and driver optimizations are applied on this card. AMD GPUs tend to age very well - their cards can be quite competitive performance-wise even though the architecture themselves are pretty old.  |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM
|
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB
|
eh Fury’s massive memory bandwidth gives it the advantage at 3840x2160. " i think i make right choice for my 4K lcd
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM) eh Fury’s massive memory bandwidth gives it the advantage at 3840x2160. " i think i make right choice for my 4K lcd Want to go 5K in the future? |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,043 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Putrajaya
|
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:32 PM) ...and loses out quite a margin though... Inb4 next big AMD driver update = 30% performance increase. Still it would be very interesting to see how the card 'grows' over time - as more software and driver optimizations are applied on this card. AMD GPUs tend to age very well - their cards can be quite competitive performance-wise even though the architecture themselves are pretty old. Yeah,rockin' the Pitcairn,R7 265. QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM) eh Fury’s massive memory bandwidth gives it the advantage at 3840x2160. " i think i make right choice for my 4K lcd 290X at RM750..  This post has been edited by Minecrafter: Jun 24 2015, 09:41 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:42 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:41 PM) Inb4 next big AMD driver update = 30% performance increase. Put nvidia aside.. Wheres the 50% faster than 290x. Yeah,rockin' the Pitcairn,R7 265. 290X at RM750.. In the presentation that was the base gpu comparison. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:42 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:41 PM) Inb4 next big AMD driver update = 30% performance increase. I have a feeling that AMD may came out with a driver that increases performance significantly - still remember Catalyst 12.11? Yeah,rockin' the Pitcairn,R7 265. 290X at RM750..  |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:44 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:42 PM) Put nvidia aside.. Wheres the 50% faster than 290x. relative to which game? In the presentation that was the base gpu comparison. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:45 PM
|
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras
|
Don't care much about the performance, it perform as it is supposed to. Just want to get the card because of the concept, technology and innovation behind it.
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 09:45 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:44 PM) relative to which game? Thats what he said in slide presentation. If u look back.. Thats the reason we all thought fury x gonna slaughter tx. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0196sec
 1.40
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 07:33 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.