QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:22 AM)
Unlimited moolah. Thats why. AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 11:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,244 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 11:55 AM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:22 AM) Aren't you already on 2 Titan X? Why get another pair of 980 Ti? The tx rig doesnt really game. By the way, thailand's review of Fury X: http://www.vmodtech.com/main/article/amd-r...096-bit-review/ Fury X is way behind in that review. Thank link has error. Really really wanted fury X. But that 4gb n doesnt have hdmi 2.0. My tv doesnt have dp1.2 n only hdmi 2.0 n doesnt support 1.4 chroma subsampling. Fury X. Interesting. Cm pump with hwlabs rads. Cm didnt even take out their logo |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 12:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 01:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
826 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:40 AM) The Fury X 1440p heaven scores is pretty low. Only 43.8fps? That actually running at stock clock. Not overclock yet.I just tested my R9 290 at 1100 core 1500 memory, at max settings 1440p heaven's benchmark and got 33.5 fps... That didn't include that I ran it with Surface Optimization turned off and texture filtering quality set to High. That robs few percent fps... QUOTE(S4PH @ Jun 24 2015, 11:26 AM) Damn that bad for a card costing that much. Bro just a quick question can my system get more performance by changing my cpu to intel i5/i7 currently using a fx8350 or is just better to just OC the bugger Better overclock that fx8350. IMO, don't need to change to i5 or i7. Mine can run 1100 at stock voltage but I didn't thoroughly tested it in many games.This post has been edited by kizwan: Jun 24 2015, 01:50 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 03:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
479 posts Joined: May 2010 |
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 24 2015, 12:53 PM) hm will do when i receive it.. lingloong use kangaroo and they send to wrong part of the state in Johor.. Muar... I have bad experience with Kangaroo. If possible I will ask seller to use others. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 03:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,604 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Seremban |
I on the other hand had good experience with Kangaroo..they even delivered my parcel on Sunday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 03:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,774 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
It all back down to the branch.
For me, I can take everything but ABX/Poslaju, for which they keep silent and didn't ship my stuffs after days reached their office and their office are farther than other couriers from my place. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 04:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,727 posts Joined: Jan 2010 From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor. |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(genjo @ Jun 24 2015, 09:25 AM) @GoldFries , between 980 and r390x which one you recommend? Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X.Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,431 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM) Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X. I do a bit of searching and found that you can get 980ti in RM 2,699.00. Palit brand ok ?Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 04:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,604 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Seremban |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM) Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X. Just what I want to hear...I will be aiming the 390x since Fury is too much an overkill for me. But will wait for other iterations of it and see what's best. The Tri-X is 2 a slot card right? Slimmer than the old 290x.Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,774 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM) Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X. LOL, didn't know 980 cheapest still RM2.4k+?Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. I still remember prior to CNY, there's offers around which bundle with PSU/SSD, after deduct the price, GPU effectively only RM1.8k... Also, now that 980TI come out and RRP dropped 50USD, I guess the price should undergo changes sometimes soon (provided our MYR conversion rate are not further worsen). But yeah, 390x's 8GB VRAM can be useful in some situations. Edited, Palit's 980 is relatively cheaper than most other brands, RM2k++. http://www.lowyat.net/pc-hardware-pricelist-cycom/ This post has been edited by Human10: Jun 24 2015, 05:08 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,774 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(genjo @ Jun 24 2015, 04:32 PM) Yeah, for reference cards, practically you buy from any brands also the same.The only problem with Palit is their shorter warranty - 2 years, which can be a little short for a flagship 2k+ card. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,043 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Putrajaya |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM) Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X. Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. QUOTE(Human10 @ Jun 24 2015, 05:00 PM) LOL, didn't know 980 cheapest still RN2.4k+? Cheapest is Zotac GTX980 AMP! 4GB GDDR5 RM1925 from Cycom.Which AMP! ?I've no idea. I still remember prior to CNY, there's offers around which bundle with PSU/SSD, after deduct the price, GPU effectively only RM1.8k... Also, now that 980TI come out and RRP dropped 50USD, I guess the price should undergo changes sometimes soon (provided our MYR conversion rate are not further worsen). |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,616 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
QUOTE(Human10 @ Jun 24 2015, 05:01 PM) Yeah, for reference cards, practically you buy from any brands also the same. Well the rich kronies who buy at this price might re-upgrade card in 2 years The only problem with Palit is their shorter warranty - 2 years, which can be a little short for a flagship 2k+ card. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:17 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
eh suddenly this thread derailed to green camp topic.
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,167 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 05:45 PM
|
|
Elite
14,576 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 04:26 PM) Price to performance ratio is in favor of R9 390X. Tri-X at RM 1.8k+ vs cheapest GTX 980 (GALAX) at RM 2.4k+ Quite a huge gap, with R9 390X on 8GB RAM. Even better on multi-card config. GTX980 if you do folding@home. QUOTE(faidz85 @ Jun 24 2015, 04:34 PM) Just what I want to hear...I will be aiming the 390x since Fury is too much an overkill for me. But will wait for other iterations of it and see what's best. The Tri-X is 2 a slot card right? Slimmer than the old 290x. I'm actually thinking of Fury too but also an overkill for me as I'm only gaming at 1920x1080.Now thinking of whether to go for 390x or wait from prices to drop once fury is out (due to competition) then only decide which card to upgrade to. My GTX760 needs to be replaced!!!! |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 06:01 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
R9 390X is impressive in price to performance ratio, and the 8GB VRAM makes it a viable option to run CFX.
Total cost still below RM 4k. Far cheaper than running GTX 980 Ti SLI. GTX 980 Ti SLI is limited to 6GB VRAM. |
|
|
Jun 24 2015, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 24 2015, 06:01 PM) R9 390X is impressive in price to performance ratio, and the 8GB VRAM makes it a viable option to run CFX. I think value wise the r9 390 is even better. Just slightly slower than r9 390x but rm400 cheaper. Should be easily overclocked to 1100 to 1150 mhz to match 390x's performance.Total cost still below RM 4k. Far cheaper than running GTX 980 Ti SLI. GTX 980 Ti SLI is limited to 6GB VRAM. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.55
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:36 AM |