NDAs for fury x will be lifted tomorrow around 8pm, all aboard the hype train.

AMD already issued an official statement that it is false.

oic where did u read that ?

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/208659-...y-denies-rumors

not a big problem, just that more VRAM does give you more performance if the game requires.

Here's my review of the R9 390X. http://www.goldfries.com/hardware-reviews/...ic-card-review/

The R9 390X was able to beat the GTX 980 on Shadow of Mordor.

Games like GTA V for example, if you set it to 4K reso with AA settings, it could tough 6GB VRAM usage. Single GPU on 4K for GTA V doesn't work well of course but when run multi-card config the VRAM will be good.

What do you mean by your closing note, that the unit was problematic?

Yes, problematic. It's the type of fault that does not hinder operation in total.

I am able to conduct benchmarks at Full HD, with GTA V being the only one that crashed regardless how I tried to get it to work.

It doesn't work at 4K. Getting replacement unit ASAP.

http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/hardware...se-5087633.html

@GoldFries , between 980 and r390x which one you recommend?

http://www.overclock.net/t/1561745/hardwar...d#post_24079438

Some benchmarks

With what happened with arkham knights.. Just ordered two 980 ti amp extreme. Fury X vram is a issue n AMD didnt do any magic to solve it n tesselation still bad but its arnd the 980 level. Still far from the ti.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 24 2015, 10:01 AM

Aren't you already on 2 Titan X? Why get another pair of 980 Ti?

By the way, thailand's review of Fury X:
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/article/amd-r...096-bit-review/

Fury X is way behind in that review.

Database error?

Keep clicking, the site is hammered haha.

The Fury X 1440p heaven scores is pretty low. Only 43.8fps?

I just tested my R9 290 at 1100 core 1500 memory, at max settings 1440p heaven's benchmark and got 33.5 fps...
That didn't include that I ran it with Surface Optimization turned off and texture filtering quality set to High. That robs few percent fps...

Damn that bad for a card costing that much. Bro just a quick question can my system get more performance by changing my cpu to intel i5/i7 currently using a fx8350 or is just better to just OC the bugger . Btw what is your power configuration to achieve 1100 gpu and 1500 memory? is it at stock

So the rumor that the Fury X is slower than the 980Ti does hold some credibility....

Error 404... Looks like they have taken down the review....

If you keep using the 290, better overclock the fx8350 and wait for skylake. But just changing to i5 will give you more performance definitely, probably even more in cpu limited games. maybe can get 5-20% higher fps in some games? not really sure.
For my 290's overclock, I only add +31 mV in afterburner

When will the NDA gets lifted?