Rainz's concept is not bad, but sandwiches are always cheaper. This is the reason why they cant sell high, because you got no value there when all the project beside is selling at approximately RM500psf-RM600psf such as Casa Green/ Z Residence/ Kiara Residence 2, all using the same access. How??

although near by condo is rm 500 - rm 600 psf. Rainz is given mostly full furnish kitchen cabinet, stove, built in oven, fridge, washing machine, dryer, air cond, wardrobe. all this need to be consider.

Yeah agree to, each to it's own liking. After Waltz residence is launched, the Rainz sales chart went really quick due to the much lower PSF, and partially furnished.
So in a way, Rainz should thanks Waltz for pushing up the surroundings psf, making Rainz looking cheap.

Another point which Waltz is proposing is the arguably walking distance to the LRT, I think compare to the Rainz, Rainz is really walking distance (400m) as opposed to Waltz (1KM).

But I also agree that Rainz location is really macam a sandwich, while Waltz is surrounded by OUG landed houses thus enjoy the view (choose the right facing though).

whats the available sizes, price, and package?

in a way... you can say it's mispresentation.... (consumer feeling)

Nowadays developer is also smart .. such details will not be in SPA, even the additional fitting (i.e free washing machine, aircon), the details (brand, product) are at developer's own discretion.

btw.. any FB/whatapps owner's group for this project ya ?

This post has been edited by tokyojihen: Jul 1 2016, 03:16 PM

add me in if there is group chat for the buyer of this project.

rainz area has 5000+ condos in a small stretch including some low n mid cost flats.. Rental demand is there due to lrt but transacted prices are low.

... any buyers notice this ?


Attached thumbnail(s)

There are two extra consent letters :

1) one is to consent the developer to undertake loan falicity based on this project (your screenshot) my understand is that the drawdown from our (purchaser) , can disperse directly to the developer's loan bank, with a capped limit.
This one I signed , as I don't see there's any alternative to move forward.
Another reason I signed because in the SPA (forgot the clause again, it is already mentioned that the developer SHALL undertake another loan facility ...,, ), so the consent letter is consistent with SPA.

2) another consent letter is to grant developer right to alter or modify the layout, design, etc etc.
This one I DO NOT sign as the words used are basically providing blanket approval to developer to modify or change the condo, the unit and everything else without seeking consent . The words used in this consent letter does not support the original spirit (i.e forgot the clause in SPA where the developer may have to change or modify certain construction as required by Approprite Authority, example bomba , dbkl and etc ) . I feel that there is a risk where this consent letter can be mis-used. And hence I do not sign. Lawyer noted this and did not pursue further.

This post has been edited by tokyojihen: Jul 3 2016, 09:45 AM

I will not take risk to purchase Rainz, that piece of land is abrupt slope and the developer didn't perform any mitigation steps and just build on it.

If there is underground water movement because of heavy rain, i am sorry to say maybe something bad is going to happen.

agree.. when passby the site it looks perched on a slope and scary.. i fear fr my life if i stay thr

[attachmentid=7013255][attachmentid=7013255]


Attached thumbnail(s)

Attached thumbnail(s)

Waltz Site entrance


Attached thumbnail(s)

Any update to the sales? Hearsay South almost taken for smaller unit, left only at North?
Are they considered sign SPA or just booking sticker game?

WCT will announce quarterly result next month. We will know how many booking convert to sales.

I've been waiting so long for someone to say this.

anyone interested to join/start an owner group ?

Not so fast leh...

hahaha, i am just telling the facts