Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool Kop Talk 2014, Newcastle-1, Liverpool-0

views
     
cherroy
post Oct 8 2014, 01:55 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(tontolou @ Oct 8 2014, 01:38 PM)
I think that time it had to do with Benitez...

SAF wasn't on good terms with him.
*
Actually, you don't sell our best or good players to rival, this is the basic of "competition". As selling your best/good player to rival club, just like handicap yourself to rival.

Look at the transfer of RVP.
After Arsenal sold RVP (their best players around that time) to MU, and eventually RVP scored plenty of goals that lead to MU crowned the league title.

So if you are rival direct with the opponent club, you don't sell your best/good players to them.

You only sell those players to your direct rival that you think is not good enough.
or
The club is not direct rival to the league position.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Oct 8 2014, 01:56 PM
cherroy
post Oct 8 2014, 04:13 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(tontolou @ Oct 8 2014, 02:02 PM)
True. But lets say, if there was a healthy relationship between those 2 managers, I think ( talking a bit of c0ck now), the deal might go thru.

Who would have taught that a deal between Utd and Arsenal for the RVP deal would go thru, since the relationship between SAF and Arsene was fierce during the late 90's up to 04 or 05. Then, it mellowed down.

And in the case of Mata as well, Jose could have sold him somewhere else, might be the ridiculous price Utd gave that promted the decision, but he was their best player for 2 seasons. Could be that Jose respected SAF...or like you have said about not a direct rival, hence Jose decision to sell Mata to Utd and make some serious profit from there.
*
When MU bought Mata time, it was Moyes, not SAF, and when the transfer is done time, MU point tally was not that good, and was way behind Chelsea and not show any sign of rival to Chelsea or CL position.

Also, the manager may view the player doesn't good in defensive and tracking back, which could detrimental to the defensive record of the team, so selling to the rival could cause rival leaking goals.
One stone 3 birds,
1. get hefty transfer money
2. The bought rival club leaking goal. biggrin.gif
3. Score against other rival (like Mancity, Arsenal), which may benefit Chelsea.

Don't get me wrong, I also view Mata is a good player.
cherroy
post Oct 8 2014, 04:51 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sinoffire @ Oct 8 2014, 04:24 PM)
......and no one raised an eyebrow when arsenal sold/released afew to citeh.  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
That's why you don't sell your good players to rival.

Arsenal sold players (Nasri, Clichy and a few more) to Mancity, they won the league.
Arsenal sold RVP to MU, MU won the league with RVP.

While Arsenal win no trophy in the process.

You only sell to rival if the insane money come in to a "declined" player.
cherroy
post Oct 13 2014, 11:38 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


I don't know modern football is more demanding than last time or not.
As nowadays, always keep on hearing injury news from the players, while last time not as frequent.

While for the like Suarez and Lampard, they seems like injury free, especially Suarez, despite being tackled hard by opponent players a lot of time, next match up and running again.
cherroy
post Oct 13 2014, 03:56 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(prophetjul @ Oct 13 2014, 11:43 AM)
Appears the modern footballer are more protected and therefore more fragile.

In the olde days, the tackles are harder and dirtier. Maybe thats why them oldies are tougher!

However, having said that, the top teams certainly play more games in a season.  Having more competitions.
In the olde days, EPL was 42 game season and Cl was knockout competition with less teams.
*
May be oldie are tougher, as last time, you see kids running around in sand pitch, muddy pitch, bruise here and there, back home, put some "oil", viola, next day play again.
Rain, also never mind, treat it as shower.

Nowadays kids, raining a bit, catching cold next day already. biggrin.gif
cherroy
post Oct 15 2014, 10:11 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(AnythingK @ Oct 15 2014, 09:08 AM)
Still can go for Reus lar, he can score goals too, and Sturridge is coming back, I don't think Sturridge will injured again, I hope..  laugh.gif

Cassilas or Valdez also no problem, even Romero also can, as long as better than Mignolet.
*
At the moment I don't think there is a need to go for Cassilas, as I don't think C is not better than Mig.

A previous first choice being benched by 2 consecutive managers has its own reason.
cherroy
post Oct 18 2014, 09:16 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(3rdElements @ Oct 18 2014, 08:10 AM)
i heard news that Sturridge will out for another month and he will miss 7 games..
dang, we are really fucuk now
*
http://www.espnfc.com/liverpool/story/2093...other-month-out

Another month... sweat.gif

Can't win this Sunday, I expect lot of question being asked especially the poor summer signing despite spend more than 100 mil that fail to get a proper striker.

cherroy
post Oct 19 2014, 11:38 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(carloz28 @ Oct 19 2014, 12:50 AM)
Koeman is getting impressive day by day. Steps into new office, a new team, new players which he has zero knowledge on their strength and weaknesses, and missing the core players...........yet 3 months later, he turns this demoralized stripped out Soto team into a beast outfit.

Instant impact. No sorry excuses related to time. Gets the job done with players he has. Brought in unknowns and make them play like marquee signings.

Mark of a great manager. No tiki taka sales pitch.
*
and the manager just works quietly behind the scene.

No possession football, tiki taka, or whatever big headline. Solid in defence despite selling 20 mil defender, 25 mil midfielder, 20+ mil fullback.
The team basically "dismantled" entirely, manager gone, previous star XI gone, and after 8 matches, best in goal conceded, even better than bas parking team!
cherroy
post Oct 19 2014, 09:28 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(RedSiglap56 @ Oct 19 2014, 09:24 PM)
If I remember correctly, Balotelli scores when he is nearer to goal. He is not getting anywhere near because our midfielders are not able to penetrate. Our midfielders are also not running off the ball and getting into good positions.

What has BR been telling these guys?

I have this feeling that BR has got his tactics all wrong in this game so far.
*
Tactic all wrong, midfield being outrun, can't string a few passes together.

Extreme lucky not to lose 0-2 by HT.


cherroy
post Oct 20 2014, 10:49 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(carloz28 @ Oct 20 2014, 10:36 AM)
I dunno why ppl blame Balo man...to me, he is playing his game exactly the style he is renowned for. He is never a creator runner like Suarez type (Suarez is the one and only) nor he is a flanker who drops deep to collect the ball and drifts to the flanks.

His style is somewhat similar to Torres right now, this guy holds the ball but needs the god damn service and defence splitting passes from the midfield to strut his stuff, which we failed to do so epicly.

God damn scouts and BR himself should know what to expect before they brought him in man....BR is not playing to his players' strength, he is more obsessed with his stupid tiki taka diamond formation which doesn't work at all than gauging his players ability. It's the same for the past 3 seasons...only this time he got no Suarez's brilliance to shadow his incompetency.

The defence? 3 yrs has gone and multiple faces come in and out. Same old stuff. Clueless.
*
4-3-3 and diamond is not working anymore and opponent already studied well how to cope and nullify entirely the team.

If after 3 years with many defence players (even change of GK) and not some "budget" player price tag come and go, it may mean the defence coaching or the way of play has some serious flaw.

You throw in 30, 40 mil rated or best in the word defenders also no use.

It is not the fault of Balo (although not a good game from him either, miss a sitter as well, but he did get in right position as a striker in the built up of 3 goals scored) entirely, the midfield simply outplayed and outrun by QPR.
Situation only turns slight better with Coutinho comes in, but still rather poor.

With this kind of display, it is just waiting to be slaughtered if facing good team like RM, Chelsea.
cherroy
post Oct 20 2014, 10:53 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Oct 20 2014, 10:46 AM)
I'm not blaming Balo. I'm just disappointed that he seemed lazy on the pitch, being sulky when things don't go his way. I also realize that the team performance was crappy anyway and he didn't get the service he needed. But when he did get the chance, he did nothing much. I'm not expecting him to be a Suarez, but I know he's capable of a lot more than what he showed last night. And yes, BR has to know how to play to his strengths. Right now, the team is absolutely clueless on how to operate with Balo alone upfront.
*
May be it is time to change to 4-4-2, as Balo as lone striker seems not working, and the entire team doesn't seem know how to play.
Play Sterling upfront?

Lone striker works well if you aim to win 1-0, and ability to shut the door or bus parking after leading, but currently Liv is renowned of goals leaking.
cherroy
post Oct 20 2014, 03:48 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(kopkiller @ Oct 20 2014, 03:40 PM)
please get rid of Balotelli

need a striker like Suarez

Suarez =31 goal + 20 assist

#ynwa
*
LOL,
Replacing a player who scored 31 goals + 20 assist player in a season?

The candidate are:

1. Suarez
2. Messi
3. Ronaldo

tongue.gif
cherroy
post Oct 20 2014, 10:24 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Everdying @ Oct 20 2014, 09:50 PM)
and james, and chicarito.
nm, we hope pepe can score some OG for us tongue.gif
*
LOL, nobody can score and need rely on OG? laugh.gif

Wait, against Mancity, the only goals scored by Liv also own goal by Mancity, right?

3 own goals gifted by opponent out 8 matches in PL, not a bad stat... laugh.gif

Never mind about striker is prolific or not, as long as OG come thick and fast... laugh.gif


cherroy
post Oct 22 2014, 01:31 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(19 Degree South @ Oct 22 2014, 09:34 AM)
He wont listen one la. if he is still alive at Anfield next season, he willbuy another team. it has proven buying the 'Saints' ws a wrong decision. All are flop in my opinion! The current saints without the flops  is actually sitting  higher than pool at the table standing! Well, at least they can score and keep a clean sheet!
*
Last time, keep on linking Swansea players, then change to Southampton, next season which team? laugh.gif

Southampton seems like dealing quite well in the summer, sold many players for 70~80 millions and so far those shipped out players are not shinning across, about average display only.
While bought 2 players that score Tadic and Pelle, with 6 goals and 7 assist players.
cherroy
post Oct 23 2014, 07:54 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(icmd @ Oct 23 2014, 07:40 AM)
we need a new striker.... balotelli cannot play, sturridge out. sterling by himself isn't enough.

liverpool needs a new keeper, one more central defender and a striker
*
after less than 1/3 season, with >100 million spent, then need a striker, a CB, a keeper... doh.gif

While the like previous transfer made sitting on the bench, Markovic, Lallana, Lamber, Manquillo, Can.

Spurs V2 in making. doh.gif
cherroy
post Oct 23 2014, 08:16 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(yeelong @ Oct 23 2014, 07:57 AM)
Or the cheapest way to improve our squad is to change our team strategy n philosophy... that might cost BR's job
*
That's prove buying cheap/budget to improve the squad depth is not money well spent, still leaking goals, can't win without OG, and poor performance despite so called got "depth".

BR's team in CL now looks like a minnow (no offence). Can't see how to progress with this kind of performance (the performance since the season start, not this match against RM, as RM is class above)

BR's transfer record may the weakest point that could cost him the job.

cherroy
post Oct 23 2014, 01:58 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(koolspyda @ Oct 23 2014, 12:02 PM)
the same argument i have seen before when things seemingly not working out in early days with suarez, and a few other instances.

Balotelli can play but probably not this Lfc style atm. rodgers feels he can turn balotelli to a suarez. while many of use feel he is trying to fit a square peg into a circle of which will balo let him or can he?
*
Everyone already knew Balo is not known for his workrate, pressing game. I don't know why many keep on focus on Balo and criticise lack of pressing, although his performance is/was poor generally (so does as a team)

If the manager want to play pressing game, you find the a high workrate striker like Kuyt. So the fault is within manager if want to criticise for the lack of pressing for signing a striker that everyone already known of poor workrate.


cherroy
post Oct 23 2014, 04:12 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(AnythingK @ Oct 23 2014, 03:01 PM)
So true, I don't know why most of the blame is on Balotelli. Furthermore Balotelli is consider a bargain buy, imagine if he's overpriced like Lallana, Lovren, and Markovic. I guess people will hire assassin to assassinate him.  laugh.gif
*
No one blame 20mil defender that constantly leaking goal, no one blame 20 + 25 mil midfielders who was labelled as creative midfielders who to dictate the midfield but only can warm the bench,
but blame a striker that bought for just a few mil more than Borini price tag...

I start to understand the term "why always me". tongue.gif
cherroy
post Oct 23 2014, 10:34 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(AnythingK @ Oct 23 2014, 09:58 PM)
You didnt see meh all those putting all the blame on Balotelli saying he lack of effort lar, lazy lar, doesnt do headless pressing lar. Come on lar seriously, Balotelli is just not that type of players, and he doesnt possess any pace to do all those things, so what do you guys expect?  ask him to become an entirely different type of player?

To put it simple, why other manager can take the best out of Balotelli, but BR cant? Its all up to the manager tactic on how to make the best of the players. Of course I understand BR cant change his entire tactic just to accommodate Balotelli, so why bought him in the first place?

Got to agree that Lovren is the most not value for money player this transfer windows. And I really hope BR can bench him and play Sakho instead when he come back from injury.
*
Liv failed to keep a clean sheet
Blame Balo?

Liv failed to dictate the midfield especially against QPR,
Balo fault?

Liv can't score a goal during second half against RM.
Balo lack of workrate again?
Wait, he was not on the pitch second half. laugh.gif

Why always me.... laugh.gif

So far I see, the poor performance is collectively as a team, not a single player.

I reckon it is the issue of either because of poor coaching, wrong tactic, or wrong personnel within the tactic etc.

May be play Toure + Skrtel? tongue.gif

I don't think it is personnel issue, keep on changing personnel is not going to solve the goal leaking issue.
The goal leaking issue has been there since last year, just the sizzling form of SAS bail out the situation each time and bury down the goal leaking issue and people do not notice it, who care when you are winning.

Remember, even against Cardiff (a relegation battling team), Liv leak 3 goals, before winning 6-3.
So this year also the same, QPR (hardly scored much and bottom of table), still leaking 2 goals.

The goal leaking situation has not changed, while there is no SAS bail out the situation that people suddenly being highlighted how worst the goal leaking situation.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Oct 23 2014, 10:34 PM
cherroy
post Oct 24 2014, 10:01 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Cloud0890 @ Oct 24 2014, 02:24 AM)
Not saying BR is doing a good job with Balo but what made you think the managers before BR took the best out of Balo? If they did what do you think made them give up on him one after another? He wasn't a success at Inter as he was still young. At City he was often playing second fiddle to Aguero and Dzeko mainly as a sub player most of the time. He scored more goals at Milan but statistics show that most of those goals come from set pieces (free kicks & penalties) and the rest mainly comes from long shots. His conversion rate is terrible because he takes way too many long shots.

Maybe you are right that BR shouldn't have bought him in the first place simply because he isn't the type of player that fits our high intensity style but are you really defending a professional for being lazy? Does is warrant him to not put in a shift just because he is THAT TYPE of player? Every manager/club has its style and the players are supposed to learn and adapt as they are paid handsomely to do so aren't they? Do you expect to go to Barca and play long balls instead of learning their ways of tiki-taka? I know Balo is not used to doing it and he might not even be good at it but what fans expect to see is him putting in effort instead of simply not trying. It is different matter if he tries and ends up not being good enough. Look at what happened to Mata and Kagawa for not adapting to Mourinho's and Van Gaal's philosophy respectively. It is only a matter of time the same happens if Balo doesn't try to learn and adapt to us.

Also, Balotelli has pace and although not as fast as Sterling or Struj but that shouldn't stop him from pressing should it? Suarez wasn't a particularly pacey player either and he was a nuisance to play against as he fights to win back every ball especially the wons he lost. Even Lambert put in way more effort in pressing when he started in place of Balotelli and the high intensity allowed our offense to operate so much better for the first time since the Spurs game.
Please do note that the ones criticizing Balo aren't pinning all failures this season on him. He is just ONE OF MANY problems we are having to endure this season. Lovren, Balo, Markovic and even Coutinho has been criticised thus far but Balo's criticism is louder than the rest simply because of his lack of effort in trying to play as a team.

Wouldn't you be frustrated if you were one of a few who runs tens of yards only for the ball to reach Balo's feet and it is blasted way off the goal? How would you feel if a teammate of yours gets a small bump on the back which isn't even a foul where he gets robbed of the ball and he then sits of the floor sulking for a couple minutes instead of getting back up to win the ball back?

I know our other new signings are performing poorly but it is not for their lack of effort. It is a different matter entirely from Balotelli's. Perhaps you could pin the blame on BR by saying he doesn't know any other tactic other than the high intensity high risk style we are accustomed to seeing last season but it is clear that is the style that suits the rest of our team and Balotelli is the odd one out here. Shouldn't we see more of an effort from him in trying to adapt to this style? We were never really good at dictating the tempo from midfield even from last season anyway. Many of our goals came from winning the ball back high up the pitch and breaking forward with pace.

Oh oh and for that myth that the rest of the team isn't providing him with enough service? "Optastats suggest Balotelli has missed four clear-cut chances this season. Nobody in the Premier League has wasted more." Once again reiterating that I think he is only being unlucky with those missed chances not bemoaning his lack of goals. I'm only criticizing him for not playing more as a team player.
*
No one defending the lack of workrate and poor display by Balo, everyone agreed he was having series of poor game and deserved plenty of criticism, but the player should not be the space goat for Liv poor performance as a team.

It is not the like taking out Balo, everything become fine again, goal won't leaking and free flow of scoring.
Yes, he is one of many problems that current Liv facing.

BR should shoulder plenty of blame especially over the summer transfer signing.
If a player is not good and detrimental to the team play, you bench him or ship him out. As simple as that. This is the manager responsibility to get it right.
But the manager played him every match...

A 25 mil player show plenty of effort, but poor, not good
A 16 mil player lack of effort, and also poor, not good.

Both are at same category, not good. Both deserved the same criticism.

Anyone who cannot deliver the result, disregards the workrate, then they are poor and deserved criticism.
They are bought at 10+, 20+ mil to deliver the result, not to show effort.
If want to show effort, there are plenty of academy players who may more enthusiasm that can show plenty of effort as well.
Fundamentally, effort cannot mask poor performance given.

Yes, it is nice and plus point to see player workrate, chasing ball around, hardworking, but football is not just about it.





4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0481sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:54 AM