And there you have it. Whether you measure the R9 380X by our preferred 99th-percentile method or in traditional average FPS, this card performs better than the GeForce GTX 960 4GB. It also costs slightly more. All told, that means these cards offer similar value propositions. As AMD hoped, the 380X delivers solid performance in the games we tested, even at 2560x1440 with considerable amounts of eye candy turned up.

so far no hiccups superb performance

Are you on Crimson driver?

Your R9 380X is brandless?

S4PH

On your signature you only mentioned R9 380X.

No brand to it?

powercolor brand is ok?

Of course, not everyone has the bank roll for a higher-end card, in which case the Radeon R9 380X is an excellent choice if it fits your budget. It is clearly a higher performing product than the Radeon R9 285 and GeForce GTX 960. The Sapphire model we took a look at was nice and quiet, and a relatively good overclocker too. If you’ve got a couple of hundred bucks to spend on a GPU upgrade, you should definitely look into a 380X. It is a clear winner in its price segment.

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is capable of achieving AMD Radeon R9 Fury X performance and gameplay experience. However, that is its limit in stock form. Achieving that goal demands a lot from this tiny video card. In our opinion the performance differences aren't worth the potential shortened lifespan or breaking of the video card to push it to those extremes to achieve that extra 10% performance, and remember what we said about the sound/noise profile.

Why is it quite difficult to find AMD APU Godavari 7870k in shop?Any explanation?

Too bad only can redee the game with Fury or more. I bought R9 390 but without any game. Only free driver disc 

Being a relatively early adopter should have its perks but not me.

when is the next crimson driver update? crossfire/dual graphics issues made me go back to 15.7

CFX over what GPU? On what game?

APU dual graphics, A10 7850K + R7 250 in all games.. and 2x R9 280x have issues in SW:Battlefront.

The A8-7670K retails at USD 109, a very good price for a processor with this performance, however there are 2 major problems plaguing the APU in Malaysia. Converting it directly based on exchange rate woudl show that the processor should retail at RM 450 which I think is awesome should it be so.

That’s the current price of an A8-7650K, and when you compare it to the aged A10-7700K the A8-7670K provides faster processing power and same graphics performance and costs 20% less. Compare it to the A10-7850K and you have a processor that costs 25% and provides similar processing power and just slightly slower graphics performance.

That’s all great until you realize that the local pricing isn’t that easy to estimate, so I reckon it’ll be priced more closely to the A10-7700K of which I think the A8-7670K is a worthy successor to provide better value at that price point.