QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Mar 2 2017, 04:49 PM)
Most of it are still doing last-minute touch up due to some issue with motherboard 
Tonight. AMD (Malaysia) Official Thread
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#121
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Mar 2 2017, 04:49 PM) Most of it are still doing last-minute touch up due to some issue with motherboard Tonight. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#122
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Kanuki @ Mar 2 2017, 05:26 PM) Hi.. https://www.youtube.com/goldfriesWhat's your youtube channel link? |
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 10:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#123
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2017, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#124
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 12:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#125
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Mar 3 2017, 12:15 AM) Interestingly someone on reddit mentioned this: AMD has already told all of us reviewers of this matter. https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/...egation_thread/ Our systems are all set to High Performance to ensure review goes well. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 12:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#126
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Mar 2 2017, 11:58 PM) As a guy that works with video transcoding, virtual machines and games... this thing is perfect With the Ryzen around I got my video work done so much faster. I made a few videos with ~30 minutes length, having even enough power to re-render which I usually won't. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 12:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#127
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Mar 2 2017, 11:43 PM) Ya it is priced similarly. Depends on games, you see my benchmarks. R7 1700 priced around RM 1600 whereas 7700k around 1.5k? But strangely, the review that i gave differs from most popular reviews Most reviews state that Ryzen gaming is behind 7700k but from the link that i gave it is closer or on par with 7700k. Something not right here Maybe goldfries can confirm why the discrepancy? ![]() ![]() As you can see, some are on par while in certain cases it's far behind. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 01:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#128
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 10:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#129
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(area61 @ Mar 3 2017, 01:10 AM) For whats worth, if someone chooses to spend more than RM 1.5k on the CPU alone then goes on to play at resolutions below 1440p seems kinda stupid. Subjected to GPU also. Ryzen results seem pretty clear to me. You want 80% performance of a i7 6900K at less than half the price, you go for any of the Ryzen 7 chips. Provided you are clever enough to game with a decent 1440p/4K resolution. You want to game at 1080p, do the world a favour and get the i7 7600K. RM 1.5k for a i7 7700K that seems only good for gaming is not worth it over the much cheaper and similarly capable in gaming i5. Some people don't need more than a GTX 1060 to game but wants to produce content fast, then it's justified to have spend more than RM 1.5k on processor and less on GPU and monitor. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#130
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(area61 @ Mar 3 2017, 01:15 PM) AMD seems to suggest that its not optimized for gaming yet(based on their statement to pcper) and all this while games have been optimized by default for intel as it has been the performance leader for the past decade. I'll reserve my judgement when the entire Ryzen product stack is out. If till then they still have performance issues in gaming, then gamers will have to default to intel for gaming. It's the other way around. Games are not optimized for Ryzen. QUOTE(area61 @ Mar 3 2017, 01:15 PM) Gamers Nexus got it right. R7s are i7 in Productivity at half the price and a slightly overpriced i5 in Gaming. Well 1/2 x 2 is really 1. Specially, high end i7. ![]() |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 02:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#131
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Not surprising. Synthetic benchmarks were already programmed to utilized the cores as much as they can.
Games on the other hand were developed based on what's available. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 03:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#132
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Mar 3 2017, 02:31 PM) If you enable CUDA acceleration rendering does it eliminate the need for stronger CPU or it will still scale accordingly? Haven't try that. All bench done without CUDA. Still new to Premiere Pro. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 04:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#133
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Mar 3 2017, 03:54 PM) Whoa... what happened? Since when?All the hyping up pointed to 1700X / 1800X being a beast for gaming performance. Even AMD doesn't talk about Gaming performance much BUT if you look at benchmarks, they're actually on par with Intel offering in most cases while being behind on some. QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Mar 3 2017, 03:54 PM) Instead, with Intel's price cut + lead in gaming performance, there is little to get excited about Ryzen, unfortunately. You're getting it all wrong.Ryzen is not ABOUT GAMERS, Gamers is just 1 part of it. Ryzen is about unprecedented computing power at certain price level, and they did it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 04:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#134
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Mar 3 2017, 03:54 PM) Instead, with Intel's price cut + lead in gaming performance, there is little to get excited about Ryzen, unfortunately. Also, only one online store had price cut. Intel never gave any price cut.Lead in game performance? Lead, by a bit in most cases. It's no wonder you're not excited, your news all wrong and expectations donno come from where also. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 05:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#135
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(eDwanD @ Mar 3 2017, 05:06 PM) Here are the videos I took at the brief by AMD staff. |
|
|
Mar 3 2017, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#136
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Mar 3 2017, 05:50 PM) goldfries i saw your post last week at FB that u use RX-470 G1 to test Ryzen? What is the result? Was on RX 470 initially because I thought I saw the benchmark lower than expected.Once I found out it was some other stuff I run in the background, I stopped doing benchies on it and went on to GTX 1080. The reason I tested on RX 470 first is because IF the RX 470 under performs then then that's going to be really bad and need not test higher end cards. |
|
|
Mar 4 2017, 07:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#137
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Mar 3 2017, 06:48 PM) Reading the reviews, praise for the sheer power of Ryzen for content creators, which is not something I would be interested in. No way this is a 5/5 from me, just my opinion. Well if you go higher resolution, the gap diminishes.If you are running graphics card like GTX 1060 and below, the gap is negligible. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Mar 4 2017, 08:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#138
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(sniperz @ Mar 4 2017, 08:41 AM) I think not so much gap in between asal can 60FPS solid in between. I'm the type that doesn't feel good when my GPU is not running at max possible speed. But yeah actually once it hits 60fps range no one cares. As long as gaming janji smooth. |
|
|
Mar 5 2017, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#139
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Yes, RAM is a bit wonky.
If you view my video or read my article, I've highlighted it too. |
|
|
Mar 5 2017, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#140
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0183sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 12:58 AM |