why would somebody from ANCAP reply through website rather than make official statement? sounds fishy
That is perhaps not the official communication. But after that was posted in the comment section, i open back the microsite, they change the picture. But the wording is still saying ANCAP. Today the change it completely.
I've guess ANCAP already communicated directly to Proton to change the advertising content.
That is perhaps not the official communication. But after that was posted in the comment section, i open back the microsite, they change the picture. But the wording is still saying ANCAP. Today the change it completely.
I've guess ANCAP already communicated directly to Proton to change the advertising content.
what change? since i don't see what differences from the site
Where's the source of before / after images? Can't find those
I have to google out old screenshot with the wording. Those who direct link the image, will get the latest amended embedded to their post.
Because i certainly remember they advertise BOTH ANCAP and Asean NCAP as 5 star. And I certainly remember the first media briefing from Proton chief technology about the car for the engine, they also did mention ANCAP 5 star. From here i suspect the odd, but i assume they got green light from ANCAP themselves to use the internal result for advertising.
This post has been edited by ruffstuff: Sep 7 2014, 09:32 PM
but seriously you've could landed with litigation from potong
No. They not confuse. But marketing department make big mistake. And i can see proton is desperate to fight with Axia since suddenly Axia is using Asean NCAP as their marketing campaign.
As for the ANCAP result itself, yes the did scored 5 star, but internal test. Not the one ANCAP pick the car and test it. Paultan was invited, and they saw the ANCAP video.
The internal test is just like Preve before, internally 5 star ANCAP, but they did not use that as marketing only after the official result out 6-8 months later and refresh the whole line up of Preve with 6 airbags and VDC as standard.
This post has been edited by ruffstuff: Sep 7 2014, 09:35 PM
No. They not confuse. But marketing department make big mistake. And i can see proton is desperate to fight with Axia since suddenly Axia is using Asean NCAP as their marketing campaign.
As for the ANCAP result itself, yes the did scored 5 star, but internal test. Not the one ANCAP pick the car and test it. Paultan was invited, and they saw the ANCAP video. The internal test is just like Preve before, internally 5 star ANCAP, but they did not use that as marketing only after the official result out 6-8 months later.
refer to dares post, probably done testing, but not allowed to advertise or one way another
Got it. Official testing results need to come from the horses' mouth right? Mkting team jumped the gun and the jargons Tested but not rated lost in translation.
But honestly, any advertising related material regarding any major product launch always go though management approval. And from my experience, nothing gets passed CEO, CFO, COO etc, even the smallest details will never be overlooked.
Got it. Official testing results need to come from the horses' mouth right? Mkting team jumped the gun and the jargons Tested but not rated lost in translation.
But honestly, any advertising related material regarding any major product launch always go though management approval. And from my experience, nothing gets passed CEO, CFO, COO etc, even the smallest details will never be overlooked.
Got it. Official testing results need to come from the horses' mouth right? Mkting team jumped the gun and the jargons Tested but not rated lost in translation.
But honestly, any advertising related material regarding any major product launch always go though management approval. And from my experience, nothing gets passed CEO, CFO, COO etc, even the smallest details will never be overlooked.
someone need to be fired. I opened thread just to make it echo. Because many not notice this. Jangan harap kau boleh lepas la Proton.
Meh, it'll be tested and probably get the 5 star anyways. It doesn't mean that it's not qualified for 5 star as not yet tested right now.
meh, my 16 year old brother will take spm later and probably pass anyways. doesn't mean that he doesn't have spm cert cos simply means right now haven't taken the papers yet
Meh, it'll be tested and probably get the 5 star anyways. It doesn't mean that it's not qualified for 5 star as not yet tested right now.
Probably.... hahahhahaha. It also probably didn't get 4 stars also as probably can mean either way. When you report, please have some credibility, don't simply said.
If you not yet tested, just said not yet tested, just like SPM, not yet get results, don't confidence said can get straight A's
Probably.... hahahhahaha. It also probably didn't get 4 stars also as probably can mean either way. When you report, please have some credibility, don't simply said.
If you not yet tested, just said not yet tested, just like SPM, not yet get results, don't confidence said can get straight A's
It is certainly 5 star rated car. No doubt about it. But it was done internally. Just like Preve, exora. The only different, they not use it as marketing when it was tested internally. That is the mistake.
Australsian NCAP is very strict. I guess, Asean NCAP should do the same too. Why allow them to use as marketing when the result was not even out in Asean NCAP website?
This post has been edited by ruffstuff: Sep 7 2014, 10:25 PM
Probably.... hahahhahaha. It also probably didn't get 4 stars also as probably can mean either way. When you report, please have some credibility, don't simply said.
If you not yet tested, just said not yet tested, just like SPM, not yet get results, don't confidence said can get straight A's
It is tested internally but by Proton, not the crew from ANCAP, the result wasnt supposed to be shown to public, but somehow the marketing team got the leaked info and put it into AD
I believe Perodua found out that GSC/PCC/Iriz wasn't in Ancap's certified list, so they complaint and asked Ancap to force Proton to embarrass themselves.
proton lompat pistol liao. the design and marketing team could use some help. but their concept cars are nice and dun even look that far out into the future unlike other car manufacturers.
i remember when listening at Hitz.fm there have an advertisement like
"In toyota, your safety is our priority"
padahal Toyota is the car with the least safety
you forget this
QUOTE(Bubble Ring @ Feb 25 2013, 10:06 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Vios rated at 4 stars, but do you think 4 stars impressive enough? Please take note ASEAN NCAP don't preform side impact crash test. Thus, total accumulated scores doesn't include the side impact crash test. Refer to my previous post regarding the importance of side airbags.
Well, let me share this Camry vs. Yaris (a.k.a Vios) compatibility crash test at 64 km/h done by IIHS. Dugong Warrior may find the crash test video offensive and die-die defend their Dugong. Here are some of their typical responses:
Dugong Warrior: "WTF, you are so stupid! Simple math also don't know LOL. 64x2=128 km/h crash test speed, sure hancur barai la..." Dugong Warrior: "When accident happen, slam brake kaw-kaw. Thus, the 64 km/h crash test is not applicable. I'm still safe and alive." Dugong Warrior: "The test is unfair! Camry is luxury car, please find and crash a similar category car."
The crash test result speaks for itself.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Two car head on collision at 64 km/h does really equal to 128 km/h crash test? Buckle up your seat belt! It's crunch time with MythBusters.
It is certainly 5 star rated car. No doubt about it. But it was done internally Just like Preve, exora. The only different, they not use it as marketing when it was tested internally. That is the mistake.
Australsian NCAP is very strict. I guess, Asean NCAP should do the same too. Why allow them to use as marketing when the result was not even out in Asean NCAP website?
In a sense, it will be the a commercial scandal which you con people thinking you got tested by ANCAP.
And I agreed on what you saying why allow to simply publish the results? The marketing departments' head should rolled if you asked me.
QUOTE(Proton Supir-ma S @ Sep 7 2014, 10:25 PM)
I believe Perodua found out that GSC/PCC/Iriz wasn't in Ancap's certified list, so they complaint and asked Ancap to force Proton to embarrass themselves.
Perodua is probably the culprit here.
So my questions is? Who do you believe more?
1. A culprit that report others wrong doing? 2. A culprit that report an unpublished or never tested results?
This post has been edited by kcchong2000: Sep 7 2014, 10:34 PM
In a sense, it will be the a commercial scandal which you con people thinking you got tested by ANCAP.
And I agreed on what you saying why allow to simply publish the results? The marketing departments' head should rolled if you asked me. So my questions is? Who do you believe more?
1. A culprit that report others wrong doing? 2. A culprit that report an unpublished or never tested results?
In, the bolehland, u boleh believe no one....................
1. A culprit that report others wrong doing? 2. A culprit that report an unpublished or never tested results?
Its good that Proton got caught for giving false info but my point was that there are possibility the culprit that reported this could be Perodua as the main obstacle for Axia now is Proton's new car.
It is tested internally but by Proton, not the crew from ANCAP, the result wasnt supposed to be shown to public, but somehow the marketing team got the leaked info and put it into AD
and i can confirm, it is going to get 5 stars
Please....... see their market results. It said ANCAP not Proton ANCAP or PANCAP. So from here i can said you manipulate me with your internal results or going to get which is not yet confirm. Don't said on going get 5 stars as your credibility is going wrong side of the line.
And previous post that I said, marketing team head's will rolled as they're doing what we can called a commercial scandal here.
Its good that Proton got caught for giving false info but my point was that there are possibility the culprit that reported this could be Perodua as the main obstacle for Axia now is Proton's new car.
That is business world for you. Not really difference with the Game of Thrones, where all party will want the Iron Thrones
Please....... see their market results. It said ANCAP not Proton ANCAP or PANCAP. So from here i can said you manipulate me with your internal results or going to get which is not yet confirm. Don't said on going get 5 stars as your credibility is going wrong side of the line.
And previous post that I said, marketing team head's will rolled as they're doing what we can called a commercial scandal here.
maybe the marketing team is smart leh
they make big hoo haa now about the crash test result, and the whole world pays attention to it,
then the actual result out with 5 stars, people will praise them and myvi macai will now turns to buy IRIZ
i sense this is all a marketing gimmicks on proton
No matter what, what's relevant is the annual revision of the ANCAP regulations.
So for Preve, Suprima S and Exora which were tested in 2013, they cant use the same results to justify how safe it is in 2015 onwards.
Should the Preve, tested 5-star in 2013, tested in 2016, it might get poorer results than then 2013 one. ;)
But come think of it, I recalled Proton promoted the Preve with 5stars ANCAP whereelse the official test were made in 2013 :stars:
If I can recall back, Preve was tested independently at the same crash test facility in Australia before the actual test when ANCAP select random cars from proton sold there. That is why they are confident about the rating. Refer to this news article. I think they did the same with the PCC. Just that the marketing team is very eager to advertise it and it isn't a professional thing to do as ANCAP hasn't done it officially.
If I can recall back, Preve was tested independently at the same crash test facility in Australia before the actual test when ANCAP select random cars from proton sold there. That is why they are confident about the rating. Refer to this news article. I think they did the same with the PCC. Just that the marketing team is very eager to advertise it and it isn't a professional thing to do as ANCAP hasn't done it officially.
Correct. It was internal test. The car is 5 star ANCAP. When they first made public statement on PCC, i was quite shock they put internal ANCAP result. So i guess ANCAP give Proton the green light. It turns out no.
so with only 1 random comment on the blog u guise belip they really ANCAP manager? lololol
QUOTE(SamsengFan @ Sep 8 2014, 06:56 AM)
Proton belip and they removed their statement.
There will be a media briefing today. I don't think its the comment alone. Proton probably get official communication from ANCAP, hence the amendment on the microsite.
“Safety is very important and customers should know which car is safe and which is not. ANCAP differs from ASEAN NCAP as it takes everything into account, and we got five stars for that, so there is no issue for us,” Proton manufacturing and production COO, Khairudin Datuk Haji Yusoff told paultan.org in a recent interview
paultantk can pre-ANCAP testing consider certified?
“Safety is very important and customers should know which car is safe and which is not. ANCAP differs from ASEAN NCAP as it takes everything into account, and we got five stars for that, so there is no issue for us,” Proton manufacturing and production COO, Khairudin Datuk Haji Yusoff told paultan.org in a recent interview
:hmm: :hmm:
paultantk can pre-ANCAP testing consider certified?
I think cars sold in their continent need to be randomly selected in order to be certified. Not sure about the preANCAP. Proton might randomly select cars from their production line in order to rate their safety
“Safety is very important and customers should know which car is safe and which is not. ANCAP differs from ASEAN NCAP as it takes everything into account, and we got five stars for that, so there is no issue for us,” Proton manufacturing and production COO, Khairudin Datuk Haji Yusoff told paultan.org in a recent interview
paultantk can pre-ANCAP testing consider certified?
No. Certified meaning it is published to the website. Just like exora before any ANCAP result, it was internally rated 4 star maximum euro ncap. Since they tested it internally at IDIADA facilities. But they never use it as marketing, but just mention it it is 4 star equivalent.
No. Certified meaning it is published to the website. Just like exora before any ANCAP result, it was internally rated 4 star maximum euro ncap. Since they tested it internally at IDIADA facilities. But they never use it as marketing, but just mention it it is 4 star equivalent.
dei baca betul. If the comment is not true, Proton will not change their content in the microsite. And Proton will have media briefing today.
If proton did not change and stick with the original information, so i guess its ok for them to publish internal result and ANCAP give them green light.
Got it. Official testing results need to come from the horses' mouth right? Mkting team jumped the gun and the jargons Tested but not rated lost in translation.
But honestly, any advertising related material regarding any major product launch always go though management approval. And from my experience, nothing gets passed CEO, CFO, COO etc, even the smallest details will never be overlooked.
quite convenient to blame the marketing team if something goes wrong.
but normally marketing get the information from the sales/tech team. they just do the design.
plus all these are proof read before releasing to the media. so unless u tell me the marketing team in proton is special that they can just anyhow make up something and release it right away after they created the advertisement, i guess this was deliberate.
Crash test dummies are full-scale anthropomorphic test devices (ATD) that simulate the dimensions, weight proportions and articulation of the human body, and are usually instrumented to record data about the dynamic behavior of the ATD in simulated vehicle impacts.[1] This data can include variables such as velocity of impact, crushing force, bending, folding, or torque of the body, and deceleration rates during a collision for use in crash tests. The more advanced dummies are sophisticated machines designed to behave as a human body and with many sensors to record the forces of an impact; they may cost over US$400,000.[2]
QUOTE(fantasy1989 @ Sep 8 2014, 04:13 AM)
but still that car is 1 of the best selling proton in AUS
safety really is overrated stuff
pick ups price like double compare with proton arena ke apa. sudah lupa.
quite convenient to blame the marketing team if something goes wrong.
but normally marketing get the information from the sales/tech team. they just do the design.
plus all these are proof read before releasing to the media. so unless u tell me the marketing team in proton is special that they can just anyhow make up something and release it right away after they created the advertisement, i guess this was deliberate.
a case of over eagerness from proton.
Yes. It is deliberate and intentional. From the Chief technical press release, from the microsite. The top management really want to have the 5 star rated to be selling point.
lol ... proton forgot they got international users also... they forgot they will check ancap website to verify it true or not hahaha... now they made a big mistake... whooops... ancap organizer sure make proton malu after this... make it 4 star max LOL...
Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
QUOTE(asiff @ Sep 8 2014, 10:48 AM)
so this Rhianne Robson, is she/he legit?
Google her name. She is the spokesperson for ANCAP
QUOTE(moviefans25 @ Sep 8 2014, 11:13 AM)
lol ... proton forgot they got international users also... they forgot they will check ancap website to verify it true or not hahaha... now they made a big mistake... whooops... ancap organizer sure make proton malu after this... make it 4 star max LOL...
In the end, when PCC is launched, dealers will put ANCAP 5-Star rating in the brochures
quite convenient to blame the marketing team if something goes wrong.
but normally marketing get the information from the sales/tech team. they just do the design.
plus all these are proof read before releasing to the media. so unless u tell me the marketing team in proton is special that they can just anyhow make up something and release it right away after they created the advertisement, i guess this was deliberate.
a case of over eagerness from proton.
I believe sometimes (most of the time) it is communication error where information get's lost in translation between marketing team and advertising agency. They didnt make it up, info was there. Just that they should've known since this is not the first time doing this that NCAP and ASEAN NCAP is different things. Maybe someone overlooked this 'small' detail. But product havent launch yet and officially the materials we see are all leaked no? SO I guess they still have time to change before release?
so in another word we dont need assuies to tell us whether we can put ncap 5 star or 6 star right?
ANCAP and ASEAN NCAP is diferent. Asean NCAP only test frontal collison. ANCAP do more comprehensive test. So 4 star ASEAN NCAP doesnt mean it is 4 star ANCAP.
Proton did scored both 5 star in Asean NCAP and ANCAP (internally). Yes it is big deal to get the ANCAP rating rather than Asean NCAP.
Asean NCAP is lauya. Why? Because car not yet in the market, and result was not even publish yet, Perodua and Peroton already use it as marketing. But lucky for Perodua, after few days, ASEAN NCAP realease phase III result.
huh what's the fuss? did proton even announce ancap 5 star? on their website it was stated as asean ncap not the australasian one. sounds like it was a mistake made by autofreaks
I used to stuff for LYN Editorial and troll at LYN Forums
Elite
2,046 posts
Joined: Jan 2003
From: On a chair, facing the screen
QUOTE(aquavit @ Sep 8 2014, 05:15 PM)
huh what's the fuss? did proton even announce ancap 5 star? on their website it was stated as asean ncap not the australasian one. sounds like it was a mistake made by autofreaks
Paul Tan still listed it as ANCAP: http://paultan.org/2014/08/31/proton-compa...photo-released/. I supposed many didn't realized it because ANCAP spokesperson somehow choose to comments at AF alone but could be because AF wroter about ANCAP's new timestamp exercise while referring to Preve and Suprima's ANCAP rating.