QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Sep 7 2014, 10:23 PM)
It is certainly 5 star rated car. No doubt about it. But it was done internally Just like Preve, exora. The only different, they not use it as marketing when it was tested internally. That is the mistake.
Australsian NCAP is very strict. I guess, Asean NCAP should do the same too. Why allow them to use as marketing when the result was not even out in Asean NCAP website?
In a sense, it will be the a commercial scandal which you con people thinking you got tested by ANCAP.
And I agreed on what you saying why allow to simply publish the results? The marketing departments' head should rolled if you asked me.
QUOTE(Proton Supir-ma S @ Sep 7 2014, 10:25 PM)
I believe Perodua found out that GSC/PCC/Iriz wasn't in Ancap's certified list, so they complaint and asked Ancap to force Proton to embarrass themselves.
Perodua is probably the culprit here.
So my questions is? Who do you believe more?
1. A culprit that report others wrong doing?
2. A culprit that report an unpublished or never tested results?
This post has been edited by kcchong2000: Sep 7 2014, 10:34 PM