Spend on classes. Replace your 7D with a 70D.

Well if you think that the features of the 6D will give you the best advantages over the 70D and 7D mk2 then go ahead.  If you're not going to take advantage of the flip screen or lots of cross type AF and 1.6x crop for zoom then you can think about the 6D for ISO.  I got the 6D and don't regret much.  The video quality is really much better than the 650D and the ISO performance.  It gets so much more details.  The FF high ISO video at 12800 is impressing me.  I mean APSC at ISO 6400 is completely horrible in comparison.  The 6D ISO will impress you so much you feel you don't need wide aperture primes to deal with low light.  The 24-105 F4 kit can be all that you need literally. 

For flash photography I don't see much difference though.  Honestly if I were just doing photography only I would stick to APSC because the lenses are so much cheaper.  Lucky for me the tokina 11-16mm works great so I don't have to worry about UWA yet.  Only lens type I'm missing for the 6D is telephoto zoom lens.  If I need that zoom I go back to my 650D with 55-250mm.  I'll still be keeping the 650D as a B camera for video.  Its so awesome to shoot video with 2-3 cameras at the same time for events.  3rd camera will be my EOS M.  3 angles to choose from and transition.  Problem I have is the 30 min time limit in video and the event can go on continuously for an hour. 

Yeah I got a bit of GAS.  But I don't mind as long as I don't buy something useless.  I did make some purchases of cheap products that went faulty and the feeling sucks knowing you have to buy its again.  Read somewhere in other forums "Buy Nice Or Buy Twice!" and sometimes it is true.  Always better to buy something that will work for the long term because you don't want to buy the same thing twice in photography/videography, when there is so much gear to acquire.  Especially for video- video head tripods, sliders, jibs, steadicam, boom mics, audio recorders, LED lights the list can go on and each really do enhance video.  You will learn it takes more than just the camera to get beautiful shots.  And last but not least the software editing skills to finish the enhancements.

I want to jump to X-T1 for the longest of time but it's a little limited.

Went for the D750 because I feel that having Dual SD-card slot is great for professional purpose, plus it has WiFi ability, pop-up flash trigger and tilt-LCD (not as nice as 60D / 70D).

All those others like A7 and Fuji stuff are great, light and all but they don't have many things I like on it. A7 isn't cheap either.

My EOS 60D's SD card slot went bongkers one day and so many content lost, some pictures I have to retake. Some I haven't even retake.

As for Canon's products, I highly recommend the EOS 70D over the rest. Flip LCD ftw!

Once I settle all my stuff for this year, I'll probably just get the X-T1 for the experience.

No need Flip Screen, cause ill be connecting to PC/Mac while shooting

Cross type AF, not doing wild life / sport photography

1.6x crop, i know the zoom and the crop

im taking the 24-70mm, cause the 105 has stronger barrel distortion

dun worry distortion cause it wont be a real factor to worry unless you are shooting architecture and lots of straight lines...

furthermore, most distortions can be fixed easily nowadays...

i hope you dont start to read about tilt shift lenses

So... taking the 105 or the 70?

an extended of 30mm is a great extention

Distortion can be fix with photo shop, i read too
even 8mm lens round distortion can become a landscape photo

In term of sharpness 70 or 105?
you guys might say the different is very minimal,

The plus side for 70mm is light weight
and the macro many people said can throw away

So... taking the 105 or the 70?

an extended of 30mm is a great extention

Distortion can be fix with photo shop, i read too
even 8mm lens round distortion can become a landscape photo

In term of sharpness 70 or 105?
you guys might say the different is very minimal,

The plus side for 70mm is light weight
and the macro many people said can throw away

So... taking the 105 or the 70?

an extended of 30mm is a great extention

Distortion can be fix with photo shop, i read too
even 8mm lens round distortion can become a landscape photo

In term of sharpness 70 or 105?
you guys might say the different is very minimal,

The plus side for 70mm is light weight
and the macro many people said can throw away

sometimes a zoom lens that denotes 'macro' simply allow you to go nearer to the subject but dont really give you macro performance
i dont know about the lens you mention as i never used before but thats from my experience with a few "macro" zoom lenses

the 24-70 is one of the exceptional zoom lens that really promise macro.

i used it with a 6D before, yes the minimum focusing distance is very short and your lens almost touches the subject, but it gives you a sharp magnification of 0.6x, where to find? for casual macro it's more than enough.

70 is sharper than the 105 for sure. smaller, lighter too.

macro can throw away? many? where you get these nonsense again?

he has been talking on and off nonsense for the page 2 pages posting ma....  

70 is sharper than the 105 for sure. smaller, lighter too.

macro can throw away? many? where you get these nonsense again?

he has been talking on and off nonsense for the page 2 pages posting ma....  

I where got talk none sense

The feature added for macro is an aid on taking close up object.

But, If this lens wants to take macro it is almost touching the object. Taking macro need sufficient light, with this lens aim so close to your object ,u can't really aim your flash.

Anybody getting the 7dmii post some pic!

Photography threads become so entertaining when newbies like this comes along     

Photography threads become so entertaining when newbies like this comes along