Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!

views
     
LegendLee
post Dec 29 2014, 10:09 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Dec 29 2014, 08:14 AM)
Need more info!
No display of Aperture setting =S
Do you use ND filter? or even tripod?
*
You can guess just by looking at the photo.
Probably a 35mm at f/2.8-4(doesn't matter as long as output is sharp), 1/50 shutter at a mid-high ISO. No ND. No Tripod.

My prediction maybe a bit off.
But it's essentially a picture taken in a mid sized room with dim lights.


This post has been edited by LegendLee: Dec 29 2014, 10:18 AM
LegendLee
post Dec 29 2014, 12:16 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Dec 29 2014, 10:43 AM)
cause he can actually take the orange light on the floor,
which means he use mid/ high shutter speed and the cathode light should over expose the entire background, but it is just right.
very nice
*
That doesn't make sense.
One can obtain similar image at 1/10s or 1/100s
LegendLee
post Dec 31 2014, 03:16 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(feathakim @ Dec 31 2014, 03:08 PM)
i want to ask that,as videographer,,

1)which one should i get either sigma 50mm f1.4 or samyang 50mm t1.5?

2)what are difference between samyang 50mm t1.5 and samyang 50mm f1.4?

TQ smile.gif
*
One uses t-stop and the other uses f-stop
t-stop is calculated based on loss of light (accurate for videography)
f-stop is based on the aperture value without considering the loss of light.

I used to have the sigma 50mm f/1.4
It's a pretty ok lens. Optics are good.

The Samyang t/1.5 would be even cheaper and it has the nice follow focus gear for you.
Optics wise, I've not really tried it but it's also full manual. So it'll be difficult if you decide to do any photography.
I heard it's a steal on a pure video standpoint though.

Perhaps someone here has used the Samyang t/1.5 before ? I personally have not tried it out yet.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Dec 31 2014, 03:17 PM
LegendLee
post Jan 2 2015, 10:25 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Just shot a wedding dinner yesterday.
It's been a long time since I last shot a dinner by myself.

It was just a neighborhood restaurant and making the shots look good wasn't easy. But I came prepared !
LegendLee
post Jan 5 2015, 08:50 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(fuelsave @ Jan 5 2015, 05:42 PM)
i have a new 70-200 f2.8 mark 2 IS USM, just wondering is it ok to change lens without turning the camera off first? I have a habit of changing lens on the fly without turning off the camera. Someone told me it would spoil the USM and IS on the lens by do so
*
Pretty sure they're hot-swappable
No problem with changing lens without switching off your camera.
LegendLee
post Jan 6 2015, 12:57 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jan 5 2015, 09:06 PM)
Got my self these,

Pretty hard to get......

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Yeap, eneloops are good.
Not because of their capacity but because they retain their charge
I'm using them for practically all my AA and AAA Battery needs too
LegendLee
post Jan 7 2015, 12:25 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jan 6 2015, 10:05 PM)
Question guys...

I just bought 1 unit of flash and manage grab my self soft box ^^( thx goldfries your recommndation)

So right now is 1 430EXii and 1 yong nuo 560mkiv + 2 soft box

need to learn flash fast!

in Manual flash configuration, what does 1/1, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64 means? 1/1 highest?
and also , the 430 Exii output is lower than 560mkiv how should i manage the balance of light? place further? adjust the 1/32-> 1/64? Increase 430Exii +0.3/0.7 stop?

And 1 last thing im a bit confuse in exposure...

Look at these few photo

Why the exposure doesn't increase as drastic as when not using flash??

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Welcome to the world of strobes/flash !

Yeap just like what Goldfries has mention, shutter speed does not affect exposure from flash.

Think of flash as a very fast burst of light (Think a thousandth of a second*)
Imagine in a completely dark scenario, even if your shutter open for 1 second or 1/100 of a second; this will not matter at all as your image will be completely dark !
Now if there was a flash, all that matters is your shutter capturing the flash !
Since to the camera, the brightness and duration of the flash is the same. (Your shutter open for 1 second or 1/100 second, but the flash duration is only 1/1000 second*)

Thus you get the same exposure.

The reason why your image above is slightly brighter in the long shutter speed is because there is some slight ambient light your camera is getting.

---
Placing lights further/nearer will not only cause change in intensity but also the "softness/harsh" of the light.
In most cases, we do not use the exact same light output in multiple flash setup. The Key(Main) light is usually always 2X to 8X stronger than the Fill light. Intensity is not just the flash power, the distance and attachment(softbox) plays a role too.
For photographers who're really picky about this, they'll use a lightmeter

Another tip.
You can't go above 1/200 normally.


* Flash duration range from 1/200 to 1/13000 depending on flash/strobes and intensity selected*

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Jan 7 2015, 12:27 AM
LegendLee
post Jan 7 2015, 12:50 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jan 7 2015, 12:42 AM)
Thx LegendLee, really really appreciate the feedback, i really want to understand flash.

I learn it the stupid way i can say haha, i mount my flash on receiver and thought very bright light from flash need very fast shutter speed i set it to 1/400 then get 1 dark pitch black image with 1/8 image display. i thought my 6D kong just few days hahaha then i tried lower down to 1/200 then only i see images hahaha( thansk for sharing)

Now i really want to know is angle, how does flash angle and distant affect the subject on screen? i heard from sone one said 40 degree angle (left right) is nice for shoot close subject, he might be wrong i dont know...

any advise on angle?
*
You can try reading up on several lighting setups.
Food, Portraits, Real estate all have different techniques.

There are just way too many to cover and they all serve a specific purpose.

A 40 degree angle from slightly above is a simple way to start it off.

For me though, some tricks I use are.
For Food, I like to have a large softbox placed above/behind to give my food a slight glow
For Portrait, I ask the talent to look at the light source.

For softer shadows, have
1. Larger source of light. Eg Softbox
2. Move your lightsource closer to subject so it'll be bigger subjectively.
(That's why the sun on a clear midday will give you harsh light even though the sun is really really big. But it's so far away it seems small subjectively)

Second lightsource may fill the shadows but it will not make the shadows "softer"

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Jan 7 2015, 12:53 AM
LegendLee
post Jan 7 2015, 01:05 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jan 7 2015, 12:53 AM)
Ahh, ic okay. let me youtube and study study.

Will post more picture soon!
Thx legend!
*
No problem, learning how flash works can be really rewarding.
LegendLee
post Jan 28 2015, 10:19 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(goldfries @ Jan 27 2015, 12:58 PM)
http://www.cameraegg.org/confirmed-canon-5...nced-next-week/

- Canon high megapixel pro DSLR cameras, there will be two models: With and without AA filter, sensor resolution is said to be 53MP, will be in stock in March, 2015. (Reminder: Sony will also announce a 50MP A7R II soon) The name of these high megapixel cameras haven’t set yet, could be Canon EOS 3D or Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.
- Canon EOS Rebel T6i / 750D
- Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM Lens, this new wide-angle zoom lens will cost around $2,800.
- Canon EOS M3
- New Canon PowerShot Cameras
*
I'm hoping they'll provide 4k video without the price of the c-series camera.
Price will be dropping (even further) for 5D3 too.

LegendLee
post Jan 28 2015, 07:16 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 28 2015, 05:52 PM)
well it's there. you can ignore it when you don't need it, but lets say one day you forgot to change your exposure before taking a shot and it turns out to be under exposed for 2 or 3 stops. you try to recover it but end up with a lot of noise that's very obvious. It happened to me before when I was shooting a bird.

You can say people is spoiled with too much of dynamic range. The same logic applies to newer cameras with fancy features compared to old dinosaur like 30d or 40d, you can still get awesome results with these older cameras but then the space for improvement is always there.

even my little em10 sensor has better dynamic range and noise handling than my eos M which doesn't make sense. Canon cameras aren't that cheap to start with so there's no excuse for them not to create a proper sensor that fits with current technology.
*
One of the faults of canon's sensor technology.
Beaten by nearly every other manufacturer.

It can be mitigated but it's just a little troublesome. Especially with all overblown skies and I had to resort to HDR.

There is no harm in hoping for a better tool for the same money you pay.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Jan 28 2015, 07:18 PM
LegendLee
post Jan 29 2015, 09:11 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(ayie_acg @ Jan 29 2015, 01:04 AM)
What about the price difference between Canon & Nikon lenses? The price is a deciding factor of which brand I'll end up with.
*
Nikon lens in general have more lens in the pricy region.
They still have good and cheap lens though but canon has a better range of great lens at a better price.
Of course canon does have it's own share of really expensive glass as well like the 70-200 is II and 24-70 II which are more expensive than it's Nikon counterpart.
LegendLee
post Feb 4 2015, 12:02 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


For those looking for a cheap macro lens
There's now another option.

With 2:1 magnification ratio (twice the Canon 100mm macro)

http://petapixel.com/2015/02/02/review-ven...infinity-focus/

Probably really bad at anything else other than macros though.
LegendLee
post Feb 5 2015, 10:10 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Feb 5 2015, 03:42 PM)
what do you mean by that though?

It's an interesting product I would say, still worth the money even if you are using it solely for macro imo.

Anyways, fresh picture from my M.

user posted image
*
Nice shot.

It's not easy to create such a high magnification macro lens that can focus to infinity without any issues in sharpness /Aberrations.
LegendLee
post Feb 6 2015, 09:21 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Feb 6 2015, 12:04 AM)
thanks. it's not SOOC, thanks to the power of RAW.

yeah I understand, but is there any review about further focusing distance though? curious about it.
*
Non macro doesn't work on FF cameras
That and I'm still skeptical on the refinement work these manufacturers can produce. It's not easy to produce good aspherical elements and coating needed to beat aberrations.
We shall see when more reviews are out.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Feb 6 2015, 09:24 AM
LegendLee
post Feb 15 2015, 02:15 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Feb 7 2015, 07:55 PM)
Whew...

couldnt achieve the same result.....

Heres the picture i have taken

CouldntĀ  very hard to remove the relection from the spoon...
gonna get wooden spoon next time haha

user posted imageMushroom-014Edited by munak991, on Flickr
*
It's a pretty good try !

If it was me, I would
1. Shoot at a slightly higher angle
2. The background behind the wooden mat (a complete black background would be good)
3. Metal is a bit hard to handle in lighting, especially the flash reflected by the spoon on the bowl. If you want, you can try using gobos to block that specific part of light hitting the spoon.
4. Fix the spoon scratches on photoshop. (frequency separation and slowly clone/brush it out)

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Feb 15 2015, 02:16 AM
LegendLee
post Feb 16 2015, 07:53 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(goldfries @ Feb 16 2015, 05:58 PM)
munak991

It's called GABO. biggrin.gif

snoot and gabo, light modifiers.
*
Eh, I thought it's spelled GOBO
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobo_%28lighting%29
LegendLee
post Mar 10 2015, 03:37 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(iamkent @ Mar 10 2015, 12:52 PM)
Just get a new Wireless Flash Trigger

Phottix Ares

I use it with my 600EX , need some help .

when flash is ON but turn on sleep mode , my Transmitter can't awake the flash .

Do i need do any setting or this Phottix Ares model can't awake flash during sleep mode .
*
Try triggering twice with 5 seconds in between.
Once to wake. Another to flash.

If thy doesn't work, turn off sleep mode on ur flash.
I use the phottix strato and it works well with the flashes I have tried.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Mar 10 2015, 03:38 PM
LegendLee
post Mar 10 2015, 11:33 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(iamkent @ Mar 10 2015, 04:50 PM)
Thank for reply,

I have checked ares do not support awake sleep mode.

Guess have to turn off the auto sleep mode.

Hope not detaining too much batt
*
I always keep my flashes in always ready mode.
Can easily last a whole dinner session.
LegendLee
post Mar 11 2015, 01:15 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 11 2015, 01:05 AM)
Hey guys,

After long week of CNY, and rush back to work. Finally got 1 weekend to take 1 shot.

This is a hard one... I didnt make the patties nicely, makes the donut become too big =(

Heres the photo, used lightroom and photo shop to edit

user posted imageDonut Burger Edited by munak991, on Flickr

Im trying to imitate this shots...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Ah. Do you have any shots from a lower angle ?


10 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1040sec    0.67    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 01:31 PM