QUOTE(eluna @ Dec 29 2014, 01:33 AM)
if no different is up 2 you right? seriously.... i didn't feel you pick bone with me but you too over confident base on what you feel
like i mention, pro level are taking into account....
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/forums/thread1105.htmREAD AND THINK BEFORE REPLY PEOPLE, DON'T ACT LIKE PRO... stop act if you dunno, perhaps you have large amount of time sitting there edit photo but no all people... yet most of new learner does not know how to edit white balance in correct way, myself also took few year do better in editing... sometime also accidentally didn't saving raw files but only jpeg format.
sometime oldest way are better for certain reason, please don't be too STATIC.
Your link just confirmed what I said.
To summarize your link
- Changing WB in a raw conversion software(Lightroom, Canon DPP) will not result in any drop of quality(lossless). As good as changing it in camera
- Changing WB in Capture one Pro, Canon DPP, Lightroom, in camera jpeg will result in slightly different images. But output of lightroom in 5000K regardless if set in camera or during export will yield the same result.
To quote them;
QUOTE
In other words, there should be no quality difference between setting the white balance prior to the shot, or afterwards in RAW development. A photo taken incorrectly in RAW using the tungsten setting instead of daylight (and then later set to daylight in Photoshop) ought to therefore be more or less indistinguishable from a RAW photo that was taken using the daylight white balance in the first place.
Hmmm, I'm just sharing my experience of the limitations I encounter.
Been there, done that.
I'm also doing my part to correct any mistaken myths/notions newcomers may encounter.
Have you thought perhaps I do know what I'm doing and you should double check your facts first?