Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!

views
     
LegendLee
post Mar 12 2015, 12:48 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(KidsCode @ Mar 11 2015, 05:38 PM)
Need to check with sifu over here, I'm going to purchase Canon 10-18mm as UWA for landscape, would like to understand the necessary of using a polariser filter or normal UV filter? I'm not a pro-user but looking for some advice and also filter recommendation.
*
You don't need a Polarizer.
It may only help in cutting down slight reflections on glass/water.

Get a UV if it makes you more comfortable. They do not contribute to better images.
LegendLee
post Mar 16 2015, 03:46 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 13 2015, 04:14 PM)
Where to get big roll of parchment paper? Want to use it as diffusal
*
I got mine from art friend.
LegendLee
post Mar 17 2015, 11:15 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 17 2015, 11:09 PM)
Lamb Burger,
Another imitation shots....

Some how trying playing with flash quite interesting  nod.gif (thx goldfries u inspire me a lot)

user posted imageLamb Burger by munak991, on Flickr

Was trying to imitate this shots

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Which focal length are you using ?
LegendLee
post Mar 18 2015, 12:45 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 17 2015, 11:17 PM)
70mm, really hope i got 100mm im working 30 cm distant =(

GST coming all lens at least RM200 more exp =X
*
You can try getting it second hand.
No GST there. (Although it'll probably still increase by a bit)

And yeah, a longer focal will definitely help you.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Mar 18 2015, 12:46 AM
LegendLee
post Mar 18 2015, 01:09 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(KidsCode @ Mar 18 2015, 11:58 AM)
how does it work if bring lenses from oversea, sure throw all the boxes away, how can they tell, when you already have a set of camera and lenses with you.
*
Tax does not apply on personal camera equipment which you are already using.
LegendLee
post Mar 19 2015, 01:18 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


An article to why people shouldn't underestimate the kit lens
http://petapixel.com/2015/03/18/cheap-kit-...ak-kids-lenses/
LegendLee
post Mar 20 2015, 10:06 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Mar 19 2015, 07:06 PM)
I didn't really feel the article all that much.  The article was mainly about framing, composing and so and so...  all about training the photography eye.  The 18-55 is a lens where beginners can't find the best picture because they are zooming in and out.  This "Kit lenses force you to think harder"...  I'm sorry but a prime lens makes you think harder imo.  My ef-m 22mm f2 is the lens that forces me to think.   

Kit lenses are optically are great and sharp.  But its zooming in and out is what makes people simply shoot like a pns cameras. 

But I do find reasons why beginners throw the kit lens for wider apertures are so they can avoid lighting gears.  They've all seem to have read that flash destroys the picture.  Which is true with pop up flashes.  So avoids lighting gear at all cost.  And lighting gears are quite alot more inventory to carry, which again they would avoid.  In the low lights the results of a f1.4 is undeniably brighter and cleaner (by using lower iso) than the kit lens.  People see these results and assume kit lens = rubbish.  Why people go a certain path can be seen and also I've been there myself too somewhat.
*
Of coz. Kit lens can't do everything...
Key is to know the limitation/advantage and use it appropriately.

they can come in handy as a
1. Scouting lens (esp the 18-135 or 18-200)
2. Used in a high risk location shoot(fire/water/elements)
3. Used with light blaster.

Besides. Kit lens these days are way way better. I used the 18-55 non IS kit lens before. It was horrible optically.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Mar 20 2015, 10:27 AM
LegendLee
post Mar 20 2015, 10:12 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 19 2015, 07:30 PM)
I use 50mm as my practice lol...

actually, pop up flash is good also... if combine with filter  with a paper the flash comes out soft and nice...

15-85 Kit lens is very nice, can be as nice as L lens man... just dont have the L ring
*
Ehhh. I would say it's hard to use.
Most of the time even external flssh will look bad if used directly
LegendLee
post Mar 23 2015, 01:14 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


One can only talk about sharpness when his or her pictures are worthy.
Else, they're just a gear collector.
LegendLee
post Mar 24 2015, 01:34 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


We have seen someone who uses a mobile phone that can take better photos than someone with a flagship DSLR here....

But Yeap, I guess it's true. Sharpness is a very important factor !!!

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Mar 24 2015, 01:40 AM
LegendLee
post Mar 24 2015, 10:00 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


I think it's perfectly fine for anyone to upgrade their gears or to pixel peep.
Everyone does that to a certain extend, Pros do that. I've seen pros pixel peep their medium format images.

However when one preaches something, at least back it up with some substance they've produced with it.

PS : I'm not advocating that everyone should shoot with kit lens. Rather, when a resultant image comes out really bad. Don't blame the gear.

LegendLee
post Mar 27 2015, 01:48 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Mar 27 2015, 12:27 AM)
Another Past week project...

Find asian food kinda hard to take =(

Cook = Me
Stylist = Me
Photographer =Me
The one who eat it= Me  tongue.gif

user posted imageChar Kuey Teow by munak991, on Flickr
*
That looks good !
You're a pretty good cook too.

BTW, the top left corner is a bit distracting
Could try going closer ?
LegendLee
post Apr 2 2015, 01:42 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Apr 2 2015, 01:41 PM)
A little off topic. Are used camera items charged with gst as well? ( means that we as camera owners can increase the price )
*
No.
Unless you're a registered shop that sells second hand stuff with yearly revenue over rm500k.
LegendLee
post Apr 2 2015, 02:03 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Apr 2 2015, 01:45 PM)
Oh thanks then. But still I guess a lot people will increase the price by themselves hmm...
*
GST is only applicable to registered companies with yearly revenue above 500k.
Which means those small/part-time/free lancer companies (including small time photogs) will not/cannot charge gst.
LegendLee
post Apr 7 2015, 03:54 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(hfz @ Apr 7 2015, 03:38 PM)
Hi guys,

Need help from who have similar experiences on dealing with the problem that am I currently facing.

I didn't use my 600D for one to two months and still remember the battery inserted was fully-chared since the last time I used the camera. Now when I switch on the camera again, the camera is not functioning.

May I know if there's anyone here know what could be the cause and is there any "home remedies" to fix the problem instead of sending it to the service centre which is going to be really costly?

Thanks much  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
Try recharging the battery again or use a second battery.
Unless there is a major battery leak(which doesn't seem to be the case and Lithium ions are far more stable than lithium polymer batteries), a camera will not suddenly stop functioning.
LegendLee
post Apr 9 2015, 03:52 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(hfz @ Apr 9 2015, 02:54 PM)
Thanks much to the three of you for those suggestions. Here's the situation for now:
I have two batteries. I tested those batteries one by one after fully-recharge it which to me it should be normal as there was no blinking indicators during charging those batteries. But sadly, after tried to switch on using both batteries - the camera still won't turn on  cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif

I am currently in a tight budget while waiting for pay to come in. So do anyone of you know where is a good place to give my camera and batteries some checking at cheap or affordable price?

And at the same time - the problem here should be within the body kit, the lens, or just those batteries that may be totally drained out?

cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif
*
Are those canon batteries ?
Try removing your memory card.

Your camera wasn't expose to anywhere wet right ?

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Apr 9 2015, 03:53 PM
LegendLee
post Apr 17 2015, 06:33 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(vankodoq @ Apr 17 2015, 05:30 PM)
I came across an explanation in the internet that 10.10 will make arrows look like a smile. Not sure if that's the truth tho. tongue.gif
*
That's quite true.
A number of watch companies keep it at 10.10 for that reason.
However the main reason they do so is because at that time, none of the hour or minute hands are overlapping.
Also, they're not blocking anything important.
The watch shot here would not be better at 10:10 as if it were to be at 10:10, it would had blocked a bigger portion of the dial faces.
LegendLee
post Apr 20 2015, 08:35 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(adam_lss @ Apr 20 2015, 08:21 AM)
i wonder if shooting thru a polarized filter will cut the slight glare at the top  hmm.gif
*
I actually like the slight glare on top.
More so if it's a distinct line.

Like on most Apple products
LegendLee
post Apr 25 2015, 11:18 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Apr 24 2015, 07:06 PM)
Ahh IC..  Yea do agree prime is sharper and always a better aperture... Once I got bonus will definitely consider a 100mm
Okay got it. That's my consideration too does a 70-200mm bring me any benefits? Now with you always taken food photography has spoken stating it is being under ultelise I have more reason to avoid a 70-200mm thx u so much
*
Didn't you wanted to get the 100mm macro for a very long time?

Just get that. If you're still unsure, get it second hand.
Don't like it can sell it off for nearly the same price.
LegendLee
post Apr 25 2015, 03:44 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Apr 25 2015, 01:13 PM)
Just bought a Canon 50mm f1.4.  Bought it two weeks ago and just played with it last week.  All photos were out of focus so bad I'd be better off using my 50mm f1.8, (6D's LCD screen quite bad to tell if anything is in focus, or maybe its my screen protector that made it hard, so I didn't know til editing time)!  This week was playing with the micro AF adjustment.  Major front focus issues but lucky my Canon 6D has micro adjustment.  Had to +12 it, which i feel is a bit much.  But then this means my 650d can't use this lens. 

Its grey good with in shop 1yr warranty.  Should I take it back to them, which I'm not sure what they would do?  Or is there a place that can re-calibrate its AF?
*
I would say just bring it back to them. It cannot be any worse. +12 is really bad. At least it's consistently +12

10 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0508sec    1.16    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 02:09 PM