QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Mar 19 2015, 07:06 PM)
I didn't really feel the article all that much. The article was mainly about framing, composing and so and so... all about training the photography eye. The 18-55 is a lens where beginners can't find the best picture because they are zooming in and out. This "Kit lenses force you to think harder"... I'm sorry but a prime lens makes you think harder imo. My ef-m 22mm f2 is the lens that forces me to think.
Kit lenses are optically are great and sharp. But its zooming in and out is what makes people simply shoot like a pns cameras.
But I do find reasons why beginners throw the kit lens for wider apertures are so they can avoid lighting gears. They've all seem to have read that flash destroys the picture. Which is true with pop up flashes. So avoids lighting gear at all cost. And lighting gears are quite alot more inventory to carry, which again they would avoid. In the low lights the results of a f1.4 is undeniably brighter and cleaner (by using lower iso) than the kit lens. People see these results and assume kit lens = rubbish. Why people go a certain path can be seen and also I've been there myself too somewhat.
Of coz. Kit lens can't do everything...
Key is to know the limitation/advantage and use it appropriately.
they can come in handy as a
1. Scouting lens (esp the 18-135 or 18-200)
2. Used in a high risk location shoot(fire/water/elements)
3. Used with light blaster.
Besides. Kit lens these days are way way better. I used the 18-55 non IS kit lens before. It was horrible optically.
This post has been edited by LegendLee: Mar 20 2015, 10:27 AM