Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
171 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!

views
     
vexus
post Dec 17 2014, 07:18 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



anyone here using canon 16-35mm F4 IS lens? Still wondering is it worth to get this lens if compare to canon 17-40mm F4.

With the amount pay for 3k+, i can get a 2nd hand 17-40mm F4 & a samyang 14mm f2.8

This post has been edited by vexus: Dec 17 2014, 07:19 PM
g88
post Dec 17 2014, 09:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vexus @ Dec 17 2014, 07:18 PM)
anyone here using canon 16-35mm F4 IS lens? Still wondering is it worth to get this lens if compare to canon 17-40mm F4.

With the amount pay for 3k+, i can get a 2nd hand 17-40mm F4 & a samyang 14mm f2.8
*
you answered your own question. Its not about how many lens or what lens you got or can buy..its about WHAT USAGE you need these lenses for notworthy.gif
vexus
post Dec 17 2014, 09:32 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



i need it for interior, architecture & landscape purpose. occasionally for group portrait.
4agze
post Dec 17 2014, 09:45 PM

SwaggeR
*****
Senior Member
783 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Hertfordshire


I've just ordered 16-35mm F4L IS and will post some info by next week (after my trip) on my findings of this lens. This lens should be good enough for interior and architectural purposes however it is arguably that 17mm & 24mm TS-E would do better on interior/architecture due to tilt & shift ability. Sharpness corner to corner wide open against 17-40mm is much better but according to the internet, from f/8 onward not much difference but again internet argues that micro contrast is much better on the former lens. If budget allows I will definitely go for new lens with the proof of recent new lenses released by Canon is superior and has no match from other competitors. I never had 17-40mm but have used 16-35mm 2.8 II it is very good but corner sharpness will only pick up from f/8 again.

If you need f/2.8 then there is only 1 choice otherwise the new F4 version is a no brainer.

Any lens will do for group portrait.

I have Samyang 14mm 2.8 this lens is super wide, good for landscape and astro photography which I really enjoy using it. Corner is shite though... tongue.gif

QUOTE(vexus @ Dec 17 2014, 09:32 PM)
i need it for interior, architecture & landscape purpose. occasionally for group portrait.
*
g88
post Dec 18 2014, 09:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(4agze @ Dec 17 2014, 09:45 PM)
I've just ordered 16-35mm F4L IS and will post some info by next week (after my trip) on my findings of this lens. This lens should be good enough for interior and architectural purposes however it is arguably that 17mm & 24mm TS-E would do better on interior/architecture due to tilt & shift ability. Sharpness corner to corner wide open against 17-40mm is much better but according to the internet, from f/8 onward not much difference but again internet argues that micro contrast is much better on the former lens. If budget allows I will definitely go for new lens with the proof of recent new lenses released by Canon is superior and has no match from other competitors. I never had 17-40mm but have used 16-35mm 2.8 II it is very good but corner sharpness will only pick up from f/8 again.

If you need f/2.8 then there is only 1 choice otherwise the new F4 version is a no brainer.

Any lens will do for group portrait.

I have Samyang 14mm 2.8 this lens is super wide, good for landscape and astro photography which I really enjoy using it. Corner is shite though...  tongue.gif
*
price will tell the optic quality and performance + the era of technology.
vankodoq
post Dec 18 2014, 09:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Oct 2013


QUOTE(AppleForMyLife91 @ Dec 17 2014, 06:45 PM)
Hi, i just bought EOS 1200D. May i know the battery is the same for EOS1100D which using LP-E10? And where can i buy this battery? Not original also can...
*
Hi, a short googling with keyword "EOS 1200D battery" confirms that its battery is indeed LP-E10. I think you can buy the battery in almost every camera shop in town. Or if you fancy online shopping, I bet Lazada or Rakuten have it. nod.gif
AppleForMyLife91
post Dec 18 2014, 04:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Sep 2011

QUOTE(vankodoq @ Dec 18 2014, 10:45 AM)
Hi, a short googling with keyword "EOS 1200D battery" confirms that its battery is indeed LP-E10. I think you can buy the battery in almost every camera shop in town. Or if you fancy online shopping, I bet Lazada or Rakuten have it. nod.gif
*
thanks for reply. I google before ady..just unsure whether both camera is compatible or not.. smile.gif
g88
post Dec 18 2014, 04:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(AppleForMyLife91 @ Dec 18 2014, 04:01 PM)
thanks for reply. I google before ady..just unsure whether both camera is compatible or not..  smile.gif
*
how and what did you google ? How sure are you with the information provided here ? sweat.gif
AppleForMyLife91
post Dec 18 2014, 04:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Sep 2011

QUOTE(g88 @ Dec 18 2014, 05:27 PM)
how and what did you google ? How sure are you with the information provided here ?  sweat.gif
*
i google EOS 1100D battery. Then they both are using the same model..so i guess they are compatible.. some more 1200D is replace 1100D one.. so i guess yeah... smile.gif
g88
post Dec 18 2014, 04:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(AppleForMyLife91 @ Dec 18 2014, 04:33 PM)
i google EOS 1100D battery. Then they both are using the same model..so i guess they are compatible.. some more 1200D is replace 1100D one.. so i guess yeah... smile.gif
*
you should google the model you bought not any other model. Anyway great you got the answer here.
AppleForMyLife91
post Dec 18 2014, 04:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Sep 2011

QUOTE(g88 @ Dec 18 2014, 05:39 PM)
you should google the model you bought not any other model. Anyway great you got the answer here.
*
i know the battery of my model already..cos i already read the manual inside my camera box.. smile.gif
Str33tBoY
post Dec 18 2014, 04:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,874 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Malacca



Anione here know wat's d current price for a new 5dm3?
Both ap & ori...
As i plan to sell my 5dm3 body...
Might plan to quit photography adi...
4agze
post Dec 18 2014, 04:52 PM

SwaggeR
*****
Senior Member
783 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Hertfordshire


Yes and no but the F4 is cheaper than the predecessor smile.gif

QUOTE(g88 @ Dec 18 2014, 09:26 AM)
price will tell the optic quality and performance + the era of technology.
*
goldfries
post Dec 18 2014, 05:57 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(g88 @ Dec 18 2014, 09:26 AM)
price will tell the optic quality and performance + the era of technology.
for 50mm f/1.8 vs 1.4, the price doesn't tell the quality. biggrin.gif

in fact no one could actually tell the 16-35 and 17-40's pictures apart, can't even differentiate it between those and the cheap 10-18!

vexus
post Dec 19 2014, 01:05 AM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



2015 Q1 there will be someone sell their 16-35mm F4 IS second hand. hahaha. Shopping spreee.
4agze
post Dec 19 2014, 06:40 AM

SwaggeR
*****
Senior Member
783 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Hertfordshire


Already have used lens for sale here tongue.gif

QUOTE(vexus @ Dec 19 2014, 01:05 AM)
2015 Q1 there will be someone sell their 16-35mm F4 IS second hand. hahaha. Shopping spreee.
*
Rice_Owl84
post Dec 19 2014, 08:28 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 18 2014, 05:57 PM)
for 50mm f/1.8 vs 1.4, the price doesn't tell the quality. biggrin.gif

in fact no one could actually tell the 16-35 and 17-40's pictures apart, can't even differentiate it between those and the cheap 10-18!
*
I was thinking of a 17-40mm for my 6D. If really can't tell the difference between the UWA lens i might as well just continue using my Tokina 11-16mm on my 6D. Yeah @16mm it works fine with no vignettes.

The corners seem a bit soft with the Tokina, but it seems all UWA lenses will have this problem.
vexus
post Dec 19 2014, 09:39 AM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(4agze @ Dec 19 2014, 06:40 AM)
Already have used lens for sale here  tongue.gif
*
16-35 F4 IS is new lens. Where got so fast sell out.
goldfries
post Dec 19 2014, 11:29 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Dec 19 2014, 08:28 AM)
I was thinking of a 17-40mm for my 6D.  If really can't tell the difference between the UWA lens i might as well just continue using my Tokina 11-16mm on my 6D.  Yeah @16mm it works fine with no vignettes. 
Toki 11-16 can be mounted on 6D?

Rice_Owl84
post Dec 19 2014, 11:40 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 19 2014, 11:29 AM)
Toki 11-16 can be mounted on 6D?
*
For the 6D , Yeah the tokina 11-16mm is EF mount metal mount. Even though its made for crop it uses the EF mount and not the EF-S mount. But only the 15-16mm works fine. 11-14mm you can see circular vignette similar to a circualar fisheye.

This post has been edited by Rice_Owl84: Dec 19 2014, 11:41 PM

171 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0269sec    0.91    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 07:34 PM