Tokina AT-X 107 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 AF DX NH fisheye. ANyone using?
Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!
|
|
 Aug 14 2014, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2014, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
is Tokina AF 16-28mm f/2.8 good lens to invest?
how about Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ? tokina AT-X 17-35 F4 not many people using? Which lens is good to invest for interior & landscape photography? |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 07:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
Tokina 16-28 f2,8
canon 17-40 f4 Both selling at 1.9k each for 2nd hand lens. Many prefer canon over tokina lol. Tokina really that bad? |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Oct 21 2014, 02:11 PM) try the lens then you know the answer. The review all over the internet. Both lens is good. I yet to make up my mind which lens should i buy.this is not the first time you ask this question and people answered before right?  |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 09:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Oct 21 2014, 07:42 PM) Well if you patient you can maybe wait for the all new Tamron 15-30mm F2.8 VC lens. Not dare try tamron. Experience back focus which cause sharpness to reduce. |
|
|
Oct 22 2014, 10:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Oct 21 2014, 06:42 PM) again as i would say, if both of them have scored really close, it's left for your preference to decide. tried out tokina. Not really good. The flare is bad.by the way you reply, you still haven't try both of them right? Canon also not that good. Increase my budget for another better lens Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM or Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L USM II or maybe the new Tamron UWA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2014, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Oct 22 2014, 01:29 PM) i will choose the 16-35 f4. used the 16-35 f2.8 for many times before, corner performance really bad at f2.8 and the price is quite high too. your f2.8 lens is version I or II ? |
|
|
Oct 27 2014, 10:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
Now i need to get a telephoto zoom lens with limited budget
Canon 70-200 F4 IS USM Tamron 70-200 F2.8 VC USD Sigma 70-200 F2.8 OS HSM 3 of them around the same price range for a 2nd hand lens. Which is the prefer lens? |
|
|
Oct 27 2014, 10:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(teikboon @ Oct 27 2014, 10:48 PM) canon ef-s 55-250 f/4 - 5.6 IS different range of lens Not for FF |
|
|
Nov 10 2014, 12:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
..
This post has been edited by vexus: Nov 10 2014, 01:06 AM |
|
|
Nov 11 2014, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM I saw many review F4 is better than the f2.8? is it true? Can't really see the differences. |
|
|
Dec 13 2014, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
24-105 F4 is value for $$$ lens but lack of IQ & sharpness. Suitable for travelling. Tested 24-70 F4 very good IQ & sharpness is there all round.
|
|
|
Dec 16 2014, 07:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
the downside on 24-105 F4 is the distance of focus is quite far compare to 24-70.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2014, 07:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
anyone here using canon 16-35mm F4 IS lens? Still wondering is it worth to get this lens if compare to canon 17-40mm F4.
With the amount pay for 3k+, i can get a 2nd hand 17-40mm F4 & a samyang 14mm f2.8 This post has been edited by vexus: Dec 17 2014, 07:19 PM |
|
|
Dec 17 2014, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
i need it for interior, architecture & landscape purpose. occasionally for group portrait.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2014, 01:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
2015 Q1 there will be someone sell their 16-35mm F4 IS second hand. hahaha. Shopping spreee.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2014, 09:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
QUOTE(4agze @ Dec 19 2014, 06:40 AM) Already have used lens for sale here 16-35 F4 IS is new lens. Where got so fast sell out. |
|
|
Dec 21 2014, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2015, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
6,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Palace of sexology
|
i am using Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM
now thinking of swapping to Tamron sp 24-70mm f2.8 di vc usd It the tamron better than my canon? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0305sec
 0.23
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 04:03 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.