Thanks dude!
To A6k users, mind sharing your experience on it's low light high ISO performance?

I'm actually planning to downgrade (again) after finishing up all my responsibilities that would be better done with my full frame d600 + 35 1.4 ART currently and I was thinking of getting a combo that will save me some money. I realized that I was spending far too much money on a hobby that I will probably not have alot of time for as I grow older.

I know that a Fuji system will probably have better ISO performance (I used to own a XT1 + 23mm 1.4 and 56mm 1.2 at one point, got it at a crazy good price), but after trying out many fuji's, I never grew to like the image quality it produced. I'm pretty sure I'm quite alone in saying this, but I feel like fuji pictures (esp their raw files) tend to be more mushy. After comparing flickr pictures (no pixel peeping though) of the CZ 24mm 1.8 and the fuji 23mm 1.4, I'm pretty sure that I personally prefer the pictures produced by the CZ.

With that being said, I'm also considering a second hand a7 and 35mm f28 combo; which is basically a full frame version of a6k and the 24mm 1.8. My big question is this:

How much advantage does the full frame a7 sensor have over the a6k; no doubt a big advantage, but how much? The thing is that because 1.8 on the a6k will give me the DoF equivalent of the 35mm f2.8 on the a7, BUT will let in more light (nearly one stop worth of extra light?). So I was thinking if this would be a good trade off since lets say that the ISO 6400 of the A7 is equivalent to ISO 3200 on the a6k, then it would be a good trade off (the only advantage the a7 has now then, would be the extra dynamic range), but I get to save at least RM1.5k going for the a6k.

And I only plan to use one lens most of the time (which is a 35mm equivalent)...

Any thoughts?

i wan ask how to shoot slo mo video on a6000
i see review from thecamerastore tv, they can shoot slo-mo in 1080p 60p, half speed
is it if my frame rate put 60, i hv to my shutter speed to 1/120 and above?
i go google the method, tried it but no slow down of the video

Haha please dont. And im not assosiated anyway with Sony.
And I hated sony systems before this, before the a6000. And still hated the others besides a6000 and the a7s

and @Eiraku @Yok70

Thank you for all the feedback!

Yes indeed we all overspend on gear, but I have a unique opportunity to actually gain a net profit from selling my current FF gear, so I considered going all the way to just save money.

The thing about Fuji is that they 'cheat' on their ISO, albeit unintentionally. Basically what happens is that if you took a X-T1 and an A6k and shoot a scene with the same amount of light available for both cameras (let's say x EV worth of light) and set them both on ISO 6400, you would need to set a longer shutter speed on the X-T1 with all other factors being equal (aperture and ISO). For the same shutter speed and ISO, your aperture value would have to change as well. So comparing ISO 6400 to ISO 6400 is pointless in this case since ISO is a relative value. I'm pretty sure that ISO 3200 on the A6k would not match ISO 6400 on the X-T1 though.
And yeah one "weakness" that I've observed about FF in general is that if you want more DoF for say, group shots, you'll have to close down the aperture quite significantly (even f4 doesn't seem to be enough for some group shots), hence reducing the amount of light that can enter the sensor, hence requiring you to bump the ISO. On APSC, you can probably get decent group shots with DoF at around f 3.5-f4 ish, which wouldn't require you to bump the ISO that much. While I really like f1.4 on FF, I rarely get to use it since it's so hard to nail focus anyway haha. And Sony's lens lineup is pretty pathetic.

Anyhow, I AM aiming for a one lens solution, so lens selection isn't an issue to me. I'd get the X100s or something, but I've had bad experiences with Fuji, and depending on how their new rumored 24MP sensor will work, I'm pretty sure I'm going sony if what you say about its ISO performance is true.

And yes, I've went to Sony shops a few times to hold on to and test out the A6k and the A7. I definitely prefer the EVF on my old X-T1, but meh they're both good enough. The a6k looks the ugliest IMO, but it feels the most compact.

Do anyone know where to buy L-Bracket for nex-6 locally?

Tonality of course cant match Digital M.
But almost there

One thing a6k users, please off the DR And please dont use wide 16:9 mode

Any chances the focus mode was on MF instead of the others?

I turn that Pre-AF off as it's kinda annoying the camera keeps on refocusing everytime.

*Finds setting and turns it off*

No wonder my camera likes to focus on all sorts of random stuff.

Mine got no such problem. Tested it on all modes, it does the Pre-AF nicely.
It struggle a bit if I turn the Live View Setting Effect ON and point the camera on a dark subject. But it still does.

Just turned it back on again to test. My A6k Pre-AF works in AF-S, AF-A and DMF. It DID NOT work in AF-C or MF (duh).

This is parallel with what Sony is telling people. Check here for details: http://bit.ly/1sZC0tB

As for WHY it's not working with AF-C is anybody's guess.

Myself I turned it back on again - I like shooting narrow DOF and it's kinda disconcerting to have everything totally blurred out when I look into the VF before taking a shot. Too used to the "always in focus" DSLR display I guess lol.

It locks when I depress the shutter anyway so no biggie.

Wait... the A7 can Prefoc in AF-C? That's... a tad unfair. Hopefully Sony gets it fixed in a FW update - if it's at all possible.

That said, AF-C by default already does what Prefoc is doing, only faster and using hybrid PCDAF (vs CDAF only Prefoc) so I can sort of understand why the engineers might wanna take it off - as having dual continuous AF systems running in parallel might not be optimum, and they wanted to have the "fastest" AF available for AF-C so turning off Prefoc totally in AF-C might free up processing for the hybrid system exclusively.

As for the A7, they made no such claims about AF speed so they don't have to optimise AF-C in any way.

Just my own reasoning regarding the matter, though it does sound likely.

And yeah... I prolly should've f8'ed. Not bad at 1.8, but could've been better.

DSC00330 by VincentLee90, on Flickr

guess who was she?

hello guys!i got my a6000 today     
but why my image size setting "L:20M,M:10M,S:5.1M" ?

A6000 can do multi exposure?

i wish there's no against rules & regulation if post lingerie shot

Hi guys,

one noob question can i use NON FF E-mount lens on FF E-mount camera? like SEL35f18 on NEX-7R.

and maybe another way round. Can I use FF e mount lens on non FF camera? example SEL35F28Z on A6000.

yok70 albnok
So without modification my picture will look like this? with all the black things on corner? 

http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/...ony-lens-mounts