QUOTE(karpkarpkarp @ Jun 21 2014, 09:53 PM)
if that is happening, it locks the owners credit, and if you service the loans for 20 years later, the original property price of 550k:
loan sum =500k
max stretch 35 years, monthly installments excluding MRTA , assuming interest at 6.6-2.45 (if you get) = RM2.1K
20 years = 20 X 12 = 240 months
240 months X 2.1 k= RM504K..(you had service), do check with bankers, at the point you start to service installments, portion of money serviced goes to interest rather than principal which is alot:
i got table from maybank source, a 400k property, 360k loan say you start now:
Year Interest Principal LTV Balance
2014 10,282.67 2992.61 89.3 357,007.39
2015 15,260.33 4562.59 88.1 352,354.80
2016 15,056.28 4856.64 86.9 347,498.16
2017 14,843.28 5096.64 85.6 342,428.52
2018 14,620.94 5291.98 84.3 337,136.54
....
2039 6,878.69 13,034.23 38.2 152,863.04
from the above, if a vendor property is:
prop price: 400k
loan sums : 360k
monthly service: 2.1 k
tenure: 35 years
as you can observe, say you started in 2014, after 4 years of loan servicing, you plan to sell and ask for banks redemption statements
lets analyse,
RM2.1K (assuming interest rates stays) X 48 months (being 4 years) = you service to bank RM100,800. you thought you had service 100k and therefore redemption statement should be around (360k loan sum - 100k) left with 260k, but look again, redemption statement despite 100k paid is 337,136.54 that is like 340k -260k = 80k short.. so check carefully by 20 years with high entry limited by price increase, do some calculation..
in normal buy and sell activity, this step asking for redemption statements cost money and time, and only will be done after S&P signed, so price fixed.. try amplyfying the 80k short to a property worth 600k.. vendors will short of 160k (if i am not wrong)..
This post has been edited by bearbearwong: Jun 21 2014, 10:47 PM