Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kia Cerato or Honda City?, Come and vote

Which car is a better buy?
 
Kia Cerato [ 117 ] ** [55.19%]
Honda City [ 95 ] ** [44.81%]
Total Votes: 212
Guests cannot vote 
views
     
Hunakadoo
post Jun 12 2014, 11:18 AM

Call me Gold Man !
*******
Senior Member
2,494 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur Dataran Merdeka



QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 12 2014, 11:05 AM)
Also remember the fuel consumption...Cerato will sucks more fuel in city drive...
New ruling end of the year...maybe 2.0cc car no more subsidies....if petrol money is concerned, get a City.
*
usually 2.0 car is below 2000cc one . biggrin.gif
SUSMatrix
post Jun 12 2014, 11:21 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(Hunakadoo @ Jun 12 2014, 11:18 AM)
usually 2.0 car is below 2000cc one .  biggrin.gif
*
Like I said...we still dunno anything. Lower cc will probably be a safer bet under this circumstances. And yes, thanks for reminding my fake lancer is only something like 1997 cc. Haha.

This post has been edited by Matrix: Jun 12 2014, 11:21 AM
blackstar88
post Jun 12 2014, 11:22 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
424 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(budak minyak @ Jun 12 2014, 11:06 AM)
Have u tried test drive cerato? Really feels that draggy?
*
when u press the peddle, you will feel like the car is pulling something heavy.. it just dont feel like the any acceleration should feel like.
Other replies like not very responsive, i totally agree!!

But before you buy any of these car, i suggest you go and test drive the car. see if which car suits you better


bananadriver
post Jun 12 2014, 12:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
Look at these reviewers trying to be the local version of Mr Nasty (TopGear's you know who)
See if you can view to the end of the video clip. Winner is Cerato, beating the Civic (which is a class higher than City)
Cerato is compared against the Honda Civic, not City. Which is more accurate, at least.



This post has been edited by bananadriver: Jun 12 2014, 12:08 PM
jwrx
post Jun 12 2014, 12:12 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
515 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
wa im impressed...50/50 the poll..Koreans have really come fat in last 10 years, even LYN ppl can vote 50/50 vs the super City
SUSMatrix
post Jun 12 2014, 12:18 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 12 2014, 12:06 PM)
Look at these reviewers trying to be the local version of Mr Nasty (TopGear's you know who)
See if you can view to the end of the video clip. Winner is Cerato, beating the Civic (which is a class higher than City)
Cerato is compared against the Honda Civic, not City. Which is more accurate, at least.


*
I am quiet sure that is not the Cerato 1.6l version.
If 2.0L Cerato...why even compare to the City? Price and performance not in the same range.
bananadriver
post Jun 12 2014, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 12 2014, 12:18 PM)
I am quiet sure that is not the Cerato 1.6l version.
If 2.0L Cerato...why even compare to the City? Price and performance not in the same range.
*
of course it is not. These cars used for comparisons comes in 2.0L versions.
but the furnishing inside are similar to the 1.6L variants. and they probably drives the same.
Look at how poorly the Civic 2.0 fared, now lets make a new forum thread in LYN asking Civic VS City...
SUSMatrix
post Jun 12 2014, 12:25 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 12 2014, 12:21 PM)
of course it is not. These cars used for comparisons comes in 2.0L versions.
but the furnishing inside are similar to the 1.6L variants. and they probably drives the same.
Look at how poorly the Civic 2.0 fared, now lets make a new forum thread in LYN asking Civic VS City...
*
doh.gif
bananadriver
post Jun 12 2014, 12:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 12 2014, 12:25 PM)
doh.gif
*
hahaha exactly, right??? sweat.gif
SUSMatrix
post Jun 12 2014, 12:31 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 12 2014, 12:28 PM)
hahaha exactly, right??? sweat.gif
*
Start thread Kancil vs Cerato 2.0L. Vote!!! tongue.gif
bananadriver
post Jun 12 2014, 12:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 12 2014, 12:31 PM)
Start thread Kancil vs Cerato 2.0L. Vote!!! tongue.gif
*
u start la. i just started one. later moderator say i flooding.
Dwango
post Jun 12 2014, 12:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
No to Koreans.
TSbudak minyak
post Jun 12 2014, 12:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
257 posts

Joined: Jan 2014
QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 12 2014, 12:21 PM)
of course it is not. These cars used for comparisons comes in 2.0L versions.
but the furnishing inside are similar to the 1.6L variants. and they probably drives the same.
Look at how poorly the Civic 2.0 fared, now lets make a new forum thread in LYN asking Civic VS City...
*
So u suggesting me to go with cerato 1.6 or city?
TSbudak minyak
post Jun 12 2014, 12:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
257 posts

Joined: Jan 2014
Current results Honda City leads the poll with 30 vs 22 for cerato.
minionbanana
post Jun 12 2014, 12:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
254 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
city
Hunakadoo
post Jun 12 2014, 01:06 PM

Call me Gold Man !
*******
Senior Member
2,494 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur Dataran Merdeka



QUOTE(budak minyak @ Jun 12 2014, 12:48 PM)
Current results Honda City leads the poll with 30 vs 22 for cerato.
*
dude , i would say 80% of them never test drive both car one .
since the poll is near, u shall go and test drive both unit & judge by ur own . biggrin.gif biggrin.gif


bananadriver
post Jun 12 2014, 01:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(budak minyak @ Jun 12 2014, 12:47 PM)
So u suggesting me to go with cerato 1.6 or city?
*
back to the age-old question. What do you want in a car? The Cerato is furnished in a way that when you sit inside, you feel pampered. Even the 1.6L is pleasantly furnished with "premium" items (yea most imported local cars removed many things). What I liked are things like rear-seat aircond blowers, powerized driver seats with memory function (presets). these small small details make the car feels really nice. City isnt a bad car at all. In fact if this thread was about City VS some other popular B-segment cars, I would vote for City, but then you asked that Cerato be compared and so personally I would get a Cerato. Did you watch the youtube clip I shared above? Even the Civic cant compare to the Cerato (although they using 2.0L for review).

Malaysians mentality has always been to compare car based on price range, and I dont blame them. But try to look beyond the pricetag factor sometimes.

Make sure you properly test-drive both cars. Imagine yourself still using that car in 5 years.
chiqnot
post Jun 12 2014, 01:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(budak minyak @ Jun 12 2014, 12:48 PM)
Current results Honda City leads the poll with 30 vs 22 for cerato.
*
that just a survey bro..you are the one that will drive the car...both cars hv its pros and cons...choose the car that suit you most....you'll be happy with that..
Volkswagen2
post Jun 12 2014, 01:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
439 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
Test drive and you would know. Koreans only look sporty on the exterior but performance wise is lacking. Paul Tan already compared the Cerato to the new Nissan Sylphy and have a read below. It's not only the quality of the drive from the gearbox but everything stamped with "Kia" is considered to be in the lower echelon.

The Proton Preve with turbo engine is a better buy than this Cerato. Forgot to mention the back of the Cerato looks cartoonish.


The Cerato’s smooth-shifting six-speed automatic gearbox is completely outclassed in comparison, both in terms of response and feel. With its 2.0 litre engine advantage it will edge forward in a drag race, for sure, but its superiority here is limited to outright speed alone. Though ultimately slower, the CVT pair feels more effortless gaining speed, with the Nissan being the more refined operator and the Toyota the quicker of the two.


http://paultan.org/2014/04/18/dnew-nissan-...t-drive-report/
Hunakadoo
post Jun 12 2014, 01:24 PM

Call me Gold Man !
*******
Senior Member
2,494 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur Dataran Merdeka



QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 12 2014, 01:11 PM)

Malaysians mentality has always been to compare car based on price range, and I dont blame them. But try to look beyond the pricetag factor sometimes.

Make sure you properly test-drive both cars. Imagine yourself still using that car in 5 years.
*
they based on Japan vs Korea car , sure japan win minded thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0768sec    1.25    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:49 PM