Hi I plan to buy a car very very soon. But still cannot make up my mind between these 2 choices. Price both almost the same, maybe Cerato is just a bit expensive. So from overall perspective, which car is a better buy between these 2? Kia or Honda? And kindly state the reason of your perspective choice. Need advise from all Sifus here.

Thanks in advance.






This post has been edited by budak minyak: Jun 13 2014, 12:31 AM

safety features and comfort features... cerato wins hands down, city is bare in comparison

For peace of mind, get City!

C Segment vs B Segment ?

Cerato all the way. Inb4 i drive Myvi saja.

Cerato no nice to ride, feels draggy/heavy.. Honda better
Unless you are finding a car with appearance/ feature that you dont actually use only..get cerato

cerato

honda = reliable.

i`ve found out that these korean makers like to use dark blue LED and backlits in their interior items , which makes them..look..cheap.

if Honda V Spec and Cerato.I opt Honda V Spec.

city for sure, very stable

If you buy Cerato, must buy 2.0, 1.6 Cerato is nice to see only..hopeless on the road..slow response and acceleration. C-segment car minimum must be 1.8cc

I compare because the price almost the same.

Also remember the fuel consumption...Cerato will sucks more fuel in city drive...
New ruling end of the year...maybe 2.0cc car no more subsidies....if petrol money is concerned, get a City.

Have u tried test drive cerato? Really feels that draggy?

For me at least 2 liter unless force induction

Tested. Dun belip you try yourself.

Kia Design looks much better. The new Honda city design really turn me off.

2.0L vehicle will still get the subsidised fuel, only 2.0L above meaning your vehicle capacity is over 2000c.c., normally 2.0L vehicle is actually 1997c.c only. So considered within 2000c.c category.

Yes. At least Campro CFE...lol. But I prefer NA.

Nothing is concrete now. So dont say its matter of factly. Be prepared for the worst.
I sure hope you are right coz my fake lancer is 2.0l.