QUOTE(OmiCatFace @ Oct 17 2017, 08:38 AM)
Read your blog sifu earlier. The diamond really looks good. I was hoping you are showing us a 0.4-0.5 carat diamond. Hahaha. I am still very tempted to buy from Brian Gavin. Giving the fact that their diamond looks good with all the images and certs provided as prove. I have difficulty on getting the real scope images here around KL and some are reluctant to provide the GIA# to me (totally skip that shop for now). All I can do is to take the GIA# and do all the calculation online. But I still prefer to get the diamond hands on to view it.
Remember Zcova's diamonds I found? They said they do not have the diamond in Malaysia. Will only proceed to order after payment. They have the image and GIA# online but not for the scopes and all. What if the diamonds doesn't look good after I made the payment and arrived here? Not sure if I can argue much about it. If compared to Whiteflash and Brian Gavin, at least I know what kind of diamond I am buying... the only downside is getting a lower carat from them and do not accept MY credit card transaction (only Brian Gavin allow MY credit card).
I remember last time a forumer has problem with credit card when buying from Brian Gavin as well. So fingers crossed.
ZCOVA relies on multiple suppliers to provide them the listing. They don't keep the inventory here. Maybe just some for display and education purpose, but not all. This will help them keep the cost low and transfer some savings back to the consumer. Their price is pretty okay as far as I am concerned. Even BlueNile (one of the largest online diamond seller) does not keep all stocks in their inventory, they only keep their signature collection, which has now been rebranded as "Astor".
All those images are really useful if we can't see the real thing. Even if we can see the real thing, those images can complement the diamond itself. Consumers will feel more secure somehow and know what they are getting. But after seeing the real thing, one thing to "complain" about Super Ideals is that there are very bright diamonds, that's why I keep on pushing for steeper crown angle to increase the fire.

.
Anyway, if a diamond has the correct proportions and the arrows are well-aligned, I believe they can be just as bright, in most environments. They might have some slight light leakage, but it is probably minimal that our eyes could not pick up all the time. It's just that, if I know the "internals" of my diamond, I feel more satisfy with my purchase because of the performance and workmanship. Also, if the cut of the diamond is at a very top precision, it will be an all-rounder in various environments.
So in general, my opinion is that as long as the arrows are well-aligned based solely on the diamond photo and hi-res video, and the proportions are good enough,
and the price is right, that diamond is worth it. That diamond can still perform well. For example, recently, a forumer purchased a 40-pointer from Zoara (
Zoara, affiliate link) cheaper by USD 300 for similar diamonds from WhiteFlash. The diamond is 3EX and has very good proportions. Arrows are well-aligned as well. That diamond is pretty worth it. I will use the same concept to buy if any other jewelers provide diamond photo and hi-res video only.
On a side note, it is pretty sad that BlueNile does not ship to Malaysia.

I will try to persuade them again in the future.
Of course, if the price of that diamond is as expensive as a super-ideal or more or less the same, I would definitely go for hearts & arrows diamond.
I have nothing against those jewelers that cannot provide scope images, we can still get pretty good diamonds if we invest time in it to search for it. I believe that all our local jewelers are ready to assist in any manner. If you don't like a particular one, there are other options to choose from. But do buy something that you feel comfortable with, and from someone you feel reliable.
And... that diamond is a 0.206ct diamond. I bought it for review and testing the transfer method purpose.
This post has been edited by kambingkoh: Oct 17 2017, 11:57 AM